|
|
|
Tachyon
DOOP Secretary
|
|
You knew the rules. <Judge Whitey> "Ah hereby sentence you to 300 years of playing in the Robot Devil's orchestra".
|
|
|
|
|
DannyJC13
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I'd say it's fine to create a new thread around about now, premiere in less than a week, old thread on 20 pages...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transgender nerd under canada
DOOP Ubersecretary
|
|
I'd say it's fine to create a new thread around about now, premiere in less than a week, old thread on 20 pages...
It's not, though. It's only fine to create a new one once the old one is locked. Threads are generally locked once they hit 20 pages, but we've had longer threads in the buildup to a new season before - it means that once the new season starts, we can have the new thread begin at the same time. The rule is not that we don't post in a thread once it hits page 20, but that after page 20, the probability that it will be locked by a member of the PEEL staff rapidly approaches 1, unless there are mitigating factors. Until a thread has been laid to rest, it should be counted as the "current" thread, and a new one should not be opened whilst a current thread exists. What's so fucking hard to grasp about that? Has the board undergone a shift from an intelligent population to being a cage full of screaming idiots, flinging their own shit around? Frida really ought to have known better than to create a new thread, especially after seeing what happened the last time she cloned a thread that already existed. Between the amount of butthurt she got and the number of people who rightly chastised her, one would think that she'd learned a lesson. Anyhow, this should probably be closed/deleted, rather than allowed to fill up until the current thread is closed, and then a new new thread should probably be created by the moderator who closes that one. Just so that everything is nicely in order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
transgender nerd under canada
DOOP Ubersecretary
|
|
Looks like there's a new thread now, despite this one still being open. Which one will be the new thread? We'll have to wait and see for the "thrilling" conclusion of this incredibly tedious saga.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scrappylive
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Dewey Defeats Truman and I declare this thread wins (because obviously I have that authority). Or perhaps that will take until page three.
You know it will...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inquisitor Hein
Liquid Emperor
|
|
|
« Reply #15 on: 06-19-2013 12:28 »
« Last Edit on: 06-19-2013 12:33 »
|
|
Maybe by the second page we'll even be dicussing Futurama news in it, rather than simply talking about the thread itself.
Or perhaps that will take until page three.
In fact, discussing the thread itself might be a valid strategy. With the show on hiatus after the 2013 run, Futurama news will be a scarce ressource. While infos about the thread (who opened it, does the thread have a valid title, was it opened too soon or late, should someone else have opened the thread, etc...) will come in unlimited supply. Therefore, we should save the scarce ressource "Futurama News" as much as possible, and stretch the thread by using the unlimited ressource "Info about the Thread ifself". To bring up a subject for discussion: I suggest we enter a new Poll category, POM style: NFNTOM= New Futurama News Thread Opener of the Month.
|
|
|
|
|
MeatablePie
Professor
|
|
To bring up a subject for discussion: I suggest we enter a new Poll category, POM style: NFNTOM= New Futurama News Thread Opener of the Month.
I agree, we have to have that.
|
|
|
|
|
Eternium
Professor
|
|
Hmm, yeah I could agree with a POM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum Neutrino Field
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Interesting to see how the plot turns out, dreams are always interesting. Also, the only reason I made another Futurama News thread was because totalnerduk suggested a new new thread should be made to replace the old thread and this prematurely made thread. Though I guess this thread works still, so meh.
I guess, even if this was prematurely opened, you shouldn't start new thread when there is any news thread open.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transgender nerd under canada
DOOP Ubersecretary
|
|
The other thread was locked, let's get back to newsworthy discussion.
Do you mean newsworthy discussion, or Futurama news? I mean, I could talk about plenty of things that are making the headlines locally or globally, but none of them are relevant to the fate or content of Futurama. Also, I think Macfarlane is very capable of doing a good job as Seymour. Though I'm not a fan of his shows, I believe he's still an excellent voice actor.
I have to agree with you there. He's a shitty writer/showrunner, but does some pretty good VO/VA work. It's all too easy to simply think of him as "that putz who does Family Guy", but he wasn't always that putz and he's got the potential to be much more valuable to the entertainment industry if only he'd quit insisting that he be taken seriously as some kind of mogul. Still, he's no Frank Welker or Billy West.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eternium
Professor
|
|
Now this is just awful, seymour needed a voice from one of the original cast in my opinion. Not mcbuueeeghh
YAy, only a few hours (I believe) when I wake up it's there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inquisitor Hein
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Well...I do not know which Family Guy scene incorporated the Simpsons in another way than a Cameo/Gimmick covered by the "Fair use Policy". The worst I have seen is Stewie in a "Naked Gun" like intro sequence, running Homer over, with Peter asking "Who the heck is that?" The "12 laughs a year" calendar in Futurama is imhO more offensive than that scene (and still acceptable).
|
|
|
|
|
MuchAdo
Professor
|
|
|
« Reply #38 on: 06-19-2013 23:45 »
« Last Edit on: 06-19-2013 23:48 »
|
|
He's good for a voice actor. He's not really that good of a singer.
Dude, he can do, like, 5 1/2 voices total. Ted is just Peter's voice.. but lazy, and also Stan's voice is just Brian but louder. And Brian is almost his normal voice! That ain't very good. But he can sing his lungs off, back when he still cared too!
|
|
|
|
|
|