|
transgender nerd under canada

DOOP Ubersecretary
 
|
|
lol, you're right tnuk. Female athletes often leave the job and then go live in the 1920's. I'll make sure to spread that around.
That wasn't what I said, nor is it what I meant to imply. I apologise if my post gave the wrong impression. That hairstyle may simply have been chosen as a possibility for being in vogue at the time. Think about it... Harry was born in 1981. He leaves school at 17, in 1998. Nineteen years later, we see the epilogue. That's 2017. We're currently in 2011, so the filmmakers had a little bit of creative license as to what the fashionable witch of the future's hair might look like.
|
|
|
|
|
Melllvar

DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« Reply #202 on: 07-18-2011 07:45 »
« Last Edit on: 07-18-2011 07:47 »
|
|
I can think of quite a few sports correspondants in the UK who have awful, awful hair Are you saying that Ginny Weasley is the Hazel Irvine of the Potterverse? While we're on it: HP7bFirstly, I'd like to say that without Alfonso Quaron this series would never have been as good as it has, especially as the first two movies were so disappointing (I remember coming out of HP1 in a rage.... wondering where the hell that two hours of my life just went.) From 3 onwards (and 3 is still the best Potter), it's been excellent, stirring stuff. Secondly, I'd like to say Hello to Jason Isaacs. Thirdly, HP7b was an excellent way to end it all, good turns from the three leads (who, in No.1 did not look like they were going to become the promising and mature actors that they have), however it's all the others, the great and good of British Thesps who've always had the back of this franchise, and they get it again. Rickman was fantastic, the aforementioned Jason Isaacs does stirling work in his small time on-screen, conveying Lucius' fall from 1st Lieutenant to Voldemort, to cowardly shadow with aplomb. I always find David Thewliss extremely watchable, and even Emma Thompson for her one and only scene is always great. Was also very happy with the running-time, at 130 minutes, I didn't seem too long and drawn out (unlike that of HP7a, in which they spent far too much time be-tented).... All in all, excellent. I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
wu_konguk

Urban Legend
  
|
|
HP7BIs there really a point in me giving a long review, even if I say this is teh worst movie ever it is probably not going to stop is making more money that some countries GDP. Fortuantly it is a good movie and I really enjoyed it. A few niggles but only one that actually bothered me In the film, Voldermort seems to be able to sense when a horcrux is destroyed. If this is so why did he not check all the hiding places when Dumbledore destroyed the rind horcrux in the half blood Prince? Still fun movie
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpaceMaN

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« Reply #205 on: 07-19-2011 10:18 »
« Last Edit on: 07-19-2011 10:21 »
|
|
The 50 Worst Movies Ever Made Make that 51.
You must have Netflix too. I totally agree. e: Ah, I see I'm 3 pages behind. Watched Airplane II: The Sequel yesterday. Pleasantly surprised at how funny it was, and that Shatner was in it. B+/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bend-err

DOOP Secretary

|
|
The biggest change from the book was probably substituting with But that was because the actor for the 1st wasn't wanted back at the set after he was found with drugs and sentenced to 120 hours of community services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bend-err

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Open endings are often better than full endings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bend-err

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Obviously. The more people you have to please, the more people you have that complain.
Everyone wants something else after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bend-err

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Harry explored Ginny's Chamber of Secrets
|
|
|
|
|
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary

|
|
Please, Ron and Hermy had been promised to each other since a quarter of the way through Philosopher's Stone.
|
|
|
|
|
Xanfor

Moderator
DOOP Secretary

|
|
I will never get why Harry and Hermione didn't hook up. As a younger girl I totally thought they would. Read the bit in Goblet of Fire where it's just Harry and Hermione while Ron is off being a git. They have absolutely nothing in common; without Ron, they really don't get along with each other. This becomes more apparent as the series goes on, culminating in the decided coldness between the two when left alone in Deathly Hallows. Not that Harry and Ginny get along any better, of course. Maybe I would have an opinion about them if I actually saw any interaction between them at all. Harry/Luna 4ever!!1! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nutmeg1729

Urban Legend
  
|
|
Harry Potter 7.2
9/10 I realy enjoyed this movie but I still think number 5 is the best in the list.
Number 5 is the single worst book adaptation ever. They missed out everything important. Number 3 is my favourite, with 7.2 coming in a close second.
|
|
|
|
|
Melllvar

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Number 3 is my favourite.
No.3 is the best one, other opinions are available, this one is the correct one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bend-err

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Yes, the 1st was (book and film) by far the worst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nutmeg1729

Urban Legend
  
|
|
Yes, the 1st was (book and film) by far the worst.
Number 5 removed one of the most important elements (the development of Sirius' and Harry's relationship) and screwed up one of the pivotal moments in the series (Snape's Worst Memory). Sirius' death was absolutely ruined. I cried buckets over the book, and I never, ever recovered, but in the movie I was like "Well why should I care, they basically cut out the entire growing relationship between the two." The first book is not the best, the second isn't as good though, and rates last on my list. The third book is by far the best, and contains my favourite chapter ever written: "Cat, Rat and Dog" and the chapter following. Of course, opinions vary, but... yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|