|
Beamer
DOOP Secretary
|
|
It's because the 3D animation is done at a much quicker framerate, allowing it to be faster. 2D animation is done at half the speed of an average DVD, hence why shots in 2D animation last 2 frames long, and the 3D ones go frame-by frame. That blurriness of animation in 2D freezeframes is only natural, as if it wasn't like that - the animation would look very clunky at normal speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
marco75
Crustacean
|
|
Thanks for your reply -- so basically there's nothing I can do about the effect... also, I mistakenly posted this message again; I was confused with the "assign-automatic-password-but-not-tell-you-what-it-is-procedure" of this BB, plus I'm stupid.
What I meant to say is "Sorry about the repost".
Tell TMC I'll do something about that avatar soon... like, now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Jackson
Professor
|
|
As good as my DVD player on my laptop is, I find that everything always looks better when I watch it on a good Sony Triniton widescreen. I guess it's just something about LCD laptop screens that never looks as good. Everyone says they're better, but since I have both and I can compare them, I always prefer watching on a real TV, it makes Futurama looks particularly good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
McGrady
Bending Unit
|
|
One good reason is how they converted from r1 to r2; they took the progressive 23.976 digital source framerate from the ntsc signal from region 1, sped it up to 24 fps, then duplicated every 24th and 25th frame and blended them. 1,2,...,23,24,24+25,25,... the speed up also causes a 4% increase in audio pitch.
The computer graphics were merely sped up from 23.976 to 25, as far as I can tell.
So even if you have a progressive scan dvd region 2 player on a PAL tv, you will still get blended frames. However, the good thing is they are only on screen for 1/25 of a second, every second.
Now that I think about it, the source they have is probably 24 fps that they moved down to 23.976 and telecined to get it playing on ntsc tvs.
If it is happening extremely often though, you probably have something wrong with your powerdvd player. Try weaving instead of bob, or leave it on auto detect. (configuration->video->advanced->try each force option and decide which one looks best)
Most software real-time deinterlacers SUCK; it looks good on tv because tv's are old and have a time delayed strobe thing so it blends the (in PALs case) phase shift to make it look good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marco75
Crustacean
|
|
Thanks for these thoroughly enlightening answers. McGrady, I tried the "force weave" option, and surprisingly, it DOES seem to help.
I'm from Europe, but I always thought NTSC TV alternates scanlines at 30 Hz, whereas PAL sets flicker at 25, giving a "combined" refresh rate of 60 and 50 frames per second respectively.
Also I understand TV's refresh rate is enough to fool the human brain into seeing fluid motion, the flicker is still very noticeable (due to the interlacing?) So have scientist determined the framerate that gives maximum viewing comfort?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|