|
|
|
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
 
|
|
 |
« #3 : 11-29-2002 18:12 »
|
|
Originally posted by Juliet: so why can't we conplain here? I mean I'm not posting these dirty pictures. This dirty pics have to stop.
You're right. The dirty pictures have to stop. Well, I'm against censorship - but some pictures shouldn't be shown - specially not at public Fanart Pages. Those art is (mostly) an offense against women and has to be stopped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chump

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« #6 : 11-29-2002 18:53 »
|
|
Here we go. My opinion on people who say things like that. You earned it. Anyone who goes around looking to be offended will be. So don't don't scour the internet in search of pictures and sites so you can bitch about how they are wrong. You say: "us woman are not your sex objects." Besides the poor typing (We not us) and subject agreement (wom en not woman) I see another problem. What does it have to do with you? How is it sexist? The answers are: nothing and it isn't, respectively. The pictures in question are not talking about you, they are talking about fictional cartoon characters. And are pictures of women in states of undress sexist? It would be sexist if they said: women shouldn't vote, or women belong in the kitchen. If it were something like that, I could agree. And speaking of people drawing "lewd" pictures, lets check out a few of these:    Look familiar? Are you saying its ok for you to do it but not this guy? And even if you say its different because since he isn't a woman and you are, that he is making you sex objects and defiling your gender, while you are merely exploring, what about Bender? Is he being a sex object here? He's we're less then a lot of Dave's pictures... I'm not saying I like Dave's stuff, but thats his way of doing things, I am nobody to tell him not to. Besides, the stuff on FSAC is TAME compared to the stuff he does on his page, which I won't even post a link to. Long story short, nothing is going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
 
|
|
 |
« #8 : 11-29-2002 19:12 »
|
|
Originally posted by Chump: Long story short, nothing is going to happen. Uh, yeah?! Realize: There is a difference between erotic art and pornographic art. Erootic art is showing people who are beautiful (in the opinion of whoever). And erotic art is showing people. People you have respect to. Pornographic "art" is showing "things, less worth than slaves". Not a sign of respect. Is this good? nah ... But, it seems that this is hard to learn for some people, so ... Well, why don't we do all pornographic art on this page from this Dave and just let the not pornographic art at the other sites?  Well, I mean if someone still wanna see "pornographic pictures" he (99% he, 1% she) may goes to this Dave's page and let the other people live their life at the not-potnographic sites 
|
|
|
|
|
Chump

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« #9 : 11-29-2002 19:18 »
« : 11-29-2002 19:18 »
|
|
Hmmm... what part of your arguement to tear apart first? First of all, you were whining about Paul's siggy block. Thats from an episode. He changed the background. So did you. You made it white, he made it a beach. Big deal. Your complaint against yourself stands it seems. Second, as for Dave's site: When he launched it, he asked me for a link. Do you blindly link to people's sites? No. You (wait...) LOOK first. His stuff up to that point wasn't that bad, so it was in consideration. When I LOOKed at the site, it wasn't appropriate for many, so we chose not to make a button link, but we were obligated to link with a word on his own page. Its still there. Make sense? So Bender isn't fully naked, so its ok? Neither is Leela I believe. And they have about equal skin showing. And what about on the show?  Scenes like that one? Are you gonna start asking for those episodes to be banned because of stuff like that? Or when the Professor and Hermes sit around naked? Thats disgracing men! According to your rules, anyone who sees those are making men sex objects! Squirm all you want Jules, you do stuff too that can be "offencive". You can't judge people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chump

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« #15 : 11-29-2002 21:51 »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|