|
|
|
|
|
superfryguy

Crustacean

|
|
I don't know why BBC didn't try harder to get the newer episodes of the Simpsons, especially when you consider what rubbish shows and productions they do waste their money on. I do think though that it's a great shame Futurama wasn't on BBC, and preferably at a sensible time. I think it would have an even bigger following here in the UK then. I agree, though, it's great to have all the episodes on DVD, at least then you can watch them, when you want and you get the audio commentaries, no stupid adds and no morons talking over the end titles!
|
|
|
|
|
Bushmeister

Professor

|
|
Ah yes Futurama on tonight, I just saw it in the TV guide. 1:10-2:00 though  Would I be correct in saying that this is "Mc"Season 4 being shown?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otis P Jivefunk

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Originally posted by Bushmeister: Would I be correct in saying that this is "Mc"Season 4 being shown? Yes, 'Roswell' will start it  Anyway, I really don't care, because I've got all the DVD's already. I would care if it was on at a time when it could grab potential new fans, but at that stupid time it won't be doing anything...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bushmeister

Professor

|
|
Good idea there Kazzahdrane! I would certainly love an hour of Matt myself and I think that the poularity of The Simpsons (be it Scully crap or not) would ensure more people watching Futurama.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregg

Crustacean

|
|
NOW they're showing season 4? It's a bit late (and I don't mean the timeslot, although it's not much better)
Anyone who likes Futurama will have bought the boxset already.
It should be on at teatime though. Loads of people watch the Simpsons on BBC2, probably more than people watch it on Sky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
superfryguy

Crustacean

|
|
Originally posted by PCC Fred: Just think how many problems past and future would've been solved if the BBC had not made that Iraq war documentary and spent the money on keeping the rights to the Simpsons...
Ahmen to that! I couldn't agree more!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lurrr

Professor

|
|
I don't know why BBC didn't try harder to get the newer episodes of the Simpsons, especially when you consider what rubbish shows and productions they do waste their money on. They did, and were hugely outbid by C4. Since Sky One get to show new episodes first, that's put a high price on those episodes for terrestrial. BBC 2 had that monopoly for a while but because the Simpsons is BBC2's highest rated show (even just the repeats!) C4 wanted it badly (more viewers=more advertising revenue). I think they are paying about a million pounds per episode because they were fighting so hard for it. To be honest, that money could be better spent on other programmes which, regardless of whether the new Simpsons is crap or not, are better for the BBC. Relying on popular American imports doesn't do much good for our own TV industry, especially when we are spending that much money on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
superfryguy

Crustacean

|
|
Originally posted by Lurrr: BBC 2 had that monopoly for a while but because the Simpsons is BBC2's highest rated show (even just the repeats!) C4 wanted it badly (more viewers=more advertising revenue). I think they are paying about a million pounds per episode because they were fighting so hard for it.
That's incredible, and a little disturbing, especially when you consider that, popular opinion has it, each 'Futurama' episode cost $1 million US.
Channel 4 could have paid to have a new series of 'Futurama' produced for less money than they paid for 'Simpsons'.
"Oh those fools, those foolish fools!"
Okay, they didn't do that because they know 'Simpsons' is a guaranteed ratings winner, but if only they had given 'Futurama' some decent promotion, and a good and consistent time slot, it would have been different I bet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lurrr

Professor

|
|
Okay, they didn't do that because they know 'Simpsons' is a guaranteed ratings winner, but if only they had given 'Futurama' some decent promotion, and a good and consistent time slot, it would have been different I bet. Maybe, but would C4 have even cared? [Leonard Nimoy]The answer, is no.[/Leonard Nimoy]
|
|
|
|
|
|