|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph Snart

Agent Provocateur
Near Death Star Inhabitant
DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #22 : 06-30-2008 17:36 »
|
|
Originally posted by ShepherdofShark:
I'm always thinking about what isn't said/shown - eg what's Mom's involvement in the plot? I can't wait for her return. I gotta hear more "Mom-isms". So far two of her saying are my favorites: "Jam a bastard in it, you crap!" and "Holy Buttcrust on a cracker!" Some day, I want to marry a woman just like her...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #30 : 07-03-2008 20:24 »
|
|
Originally posted by Smitty: "Oh, Lord, I'm half-horse and half-naked!" I loved that one!  Classic Leela right there. Originally posted by Ralph Snart: And this is from a guy who hates Dungeons and Dragons. My sentiments exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph Snart

Agent Provocateur
Near Death Star Inhabitant
DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #34 : 07-04-2008 09:12 »
|
|
Originally posted by aknightofni:
And whats that collar leela is wearing when she falls? I wonder about that also. I can see Leela being into B&D but she'd be the dominant partner - there's now way I could see her being submissive enough to wear a collar. Oh wait, this is a D&D ripoff, not a B&D ripoff. [Gilda Radner]Never Mind.[/Gilda Radner] Ralph "wants Leela to be a freak" Snart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RogerWilco81

Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #39 : 07-04-2008 15:05 »
|
|
Honestly, when I first saw the trailer and heard the premise, I was kind of put off. It isn't that I don't like the fantasy genre, I grew up playing games like Quest for Glory so I'm no stranger to that world, I just don't think it belongs in the Futurama world outside a AOI scenerio. But I won't judge it till I see it. I recently read an interview with DXC where he says the movie will shed further light on some past events. To quote: From a writing standpoint, how do consider an audience that’s virgin to the Futurama viewing experience? The movies are peppered with references to the show. There’s a fine line we have to walk, because we want to really give a treat to the longtime fans by throwing in lots of weird side character [appearances]…but we also don’t want the whole thing to bog down in joke references. We tried to give enough, but not too much, and I hope we succeeded. There are some periodic flashbacks that explain a little more about things that happened [in the] first [film]. There’ll be a couple instances of that in Bender’s Game [due out this fall]. We explain the back story a little bit more of Nibbler and of the Professor and there will be a few explanations of things that happened. The attempt is made, at least, and I hope we pulled it off to do those things in such a way that if you didn’t see them the first time, it’ll just be a bonus for those people who say, “A-ha! That explains why…” Maybe the origin of Fry's tattoo will be reveiled...the full interview can be found here: http://artistdirect.com/nad/news/article/0,,4705880,00.html
|
|
|
|
|