RäTIN' ZYSTEM

[on:]

Catchy title eh??? Anywayz we (the Futurama Oscars) are looking for a new rating system, something with a Futurama touch to it. There should be 5 categories ex.
exellent
good
fair
bad
awful

[Reply #1 on:]

try to come up with something kewl

[Reply #2 on:]

There are sites now that use the rating system of "Excellent, Good, Fair, etc" - I can't think of anything at this moment, but I would just suggest coming up with something new or different than other sites - be creative!

[Reply #3 on:]

i know... that's what Planet Roadmap uses, so that's why i need something new, something with a Futurama ring to it. I would appreceate it if people helped me with this...

[Reply #4 on:]

something more like this:
>outstanding
>good
>not bad
>bad
>awful
but with Futurama style words. Words, or phrases that the characters often use

[Reply #5 on:]

what are u talking about jwso?
a rating system where users can vote?

[Reply #6 on:]

no, a rating system by which i rate sites by. it's going to be for the oscars (which, if you didn't know is a link site)

[Reply #7 on:]

How about something along the lines of: (going form worst to best)

Hermes-worthy
Fry-worthy
Bender-worthy
Leela-worthy

?

[Reply #8 on:]

oh,now I get it(I hope);
You want Futurama styled ratings
you can use to rank the linked sites so you don`t rip-off other sites like PR?

(sorry I`m so dumb)

[Reply #9 on:]

Ya, that's what he wants.

How about something like:

Fry's Fabulous Picks
Farnsworth's Fair Picks
Bender's Bad Picks
Amy's Awful Picks

and so on...

[Reply #10 on:]

That's very good ZOIDBERG. The Futurama Oscars should use it. It's very catchy.

[Reply #11 on:]

That's very good ZOIDBERG. The Futurama Oscars should use it. It's very catchy.
 

[Reply #12 on:]

hehe. That is good

[Reply #13 on:]

and maybe Grrr's good picks

[Reply #14 on:]

Quiet you! It's Jrrr.

[Reply #15 on:]

The very best site could be "swwwish!!"

lol!!   

[Reply #16 on:]

One more: Leela's Lousy Picks

[Reply #17 on:]

Am I just stupid (You fool, you foolish fool) or are you guys just posting stupid posts that make no sense? Probably both.... not that I care... it's just cool ot read them.

[Reply #18 on:]

Yeah, Zoidberg's things R cool, why didn't ya use 'em jwso

[Reply #19 on:]

how about awful have an Amy "Gu'h"
or something
---Baz
free.mastersites.com/futupollrama

[Reply #20 on:]

 

Originally posted by jwso:
Catchy title eh???  Anywayz we (the Futurama Oscars) are looking for a new rating system, something with a Futurama touch to it. There should be 5 categories ex.
exellent
good
fair
bad
awful

If it's for the Oscars then it should be:
1) Great!
2) For what I've seen it looks good.
3) They told me it was just ok.
4) I've only seen the main page and I didn't like it.
5) Never been there, but it looks like it sucks.

[Reply #21 on:]

we (oscars) r gonna use them when we redo the list. that should happen when i'm not too lazy to get of this chair i'm sitting in (=never)

[Reply #22 on:]

wow... i made it sound like i'll never do it oh well. i'll (me david, and the rest of the people working @ the oscars) will redo it in the next week or so

[Reply #23 on:]

Will the Oscars ever return??

[Reply #24 on:]

Well.. Will they?

[Reply #25 on:]

not sure. i think david's planning on opening it again, but i'm not sure

[Reply #26 on:]

I don' think that the words awful or bad are good in link sites. It feels terrible if you are in that rank. Maybe some other name.