|
|
|
ooy
Professor
|
|
|
« Reply #3 on: 12-22-2003 19:19 »
« Last Edit on: 12-22-2003 19:19 »
|
|
my websites gonna be called 'oh, god! not another futurama website' [O.G.N.A.F.W] I'VE made buddie buttons, most of the contents, but need contacts, theres about 5 avaliable. we have telstra ADSL brourdband[sp?] so we have room for it problem is...we dont know how. Originally posted by kryten: whats your site suppost to be about?
this is a futurama message board, what do you think? futurama !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
|
« Reply #5 on: 12-22-2003 19:48 »
« Last Edit on: 12-22-2003 19:48 »
|
|
Originally posted by ooy: Originally posted by kryten: whats your site suppost to be about?
this is a futurama message board, what do you think?
futurama ! Yeah, but what's the main focus of the site? Is it a Fry site? A Leela site? Hermes? General? Technology of Futurama? etc. It would be a bit stupid to suggest names before we have the answer to that question, don't you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
::high fives Kryten::
::Catches Bendo on the rebound::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margarita
Space Pope
|
|
|
« Reply #25 on: 12-24-2003 22:49 »
« Last Edit on: 12-24-2003 22:49 »
|
|
Point is, Margarita, I'm sick of seeing your unprovoked drive-by flames in every damn thread.
where, may i ask? provide some links, at least. and i dont flame, i post my opinion, and if i think there're enough futurama sites already i'll post that; and no one, even you "UberMod", wont stop me. but okay, it looks like i have to explain my point in a whole essay to make you understand... i'll try to explain: 1) fry2006 already had site and it died. 2) i dont think anyone can make general futurama site better than CGEF 3) i dont think anyone can make better character site than Fry Hole, Leela Zone, OAOB, etc... 4) there're enough futurama sites already. ...then i have a question: what's the point?... i dont see a point in creating a new website. is there anything wrong with what i said?... no? then try to read my posts better. Next one I see results in an automatic ban.
uh-huh. be careful with those statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xmpel
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by Margarita: 1) fry2006 already had site and it died. 2) i dont think anyone can make general futurama site better than CGEF 3) i dont think anyone can make better character site than Fry Hole, Leela Zone, OAOB, etc... 4) there're enough futurama sites already. ...then i have a question: what's the point?... 1) Indeed he did. I too think he will abandon this. 2)Maybe they can't but they can still make an enjoyable site worth visiting a couple of times. 3)But you can let them try. And maybe they do make a good one. 4)Because a well made Futurama site is enjoyable and browse-worthy. Kryten, I think you're over reacting. Bansticks are ugly.
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
|
« Reply #33 on: 12-25-2003 21:09 »
« Last Edit on: 12-25-2003 21:09 »
|
|
Originally posted by Margarita: where, may i ask? provide some links, at least.
and i dont flame, i post my opinion, and if i think there're enough futurama sites already i'll post that; and no one, even you "UberMod", wont stop me. Then post that, no need to be all "your site sucks, and you should feel bad" without even knowing what the site is about or look like. but okay, it looks like i have to explain my point in a whole essay to make you understand... i'll try to explain:
1) fry2006 already had site and it died.
True, but how does that equate that his new site will suffer a similar fate? One example is not a good base for drawing wide-ranging conclusions (source: Statistics 101). 2) i dont think anyone can make general futurama site better than CGEF I don't know, Planet Express.dk was pretty awesome, and TFP is too. You're probably right, but why should that mean people couldn't try? It's like saying IE6 works great, don't waste your time with crappy Linux and Opera junk. 3) i dont think anyone can make better character site than Fry Hole, Leela Zone, OAOB, etc... That still leave Zoidy, Farnsworth, Cubert/Dwight, Kif/Zapp plus the various species. And who even said it was a general/character site. Maybe it's about the technology of Futurama, foods and drinks of the future, or something entirely different. 4) there're enough futurama sites already. Really? I can name maybe 15 good, regularly updated English Futurama sites. Certainly seems like room for one more. ...then i have a question: what's the point?...
i dont see a point in creating a new website. is there anything wrong with what i said?... no? then try to read my posts better. . There's nothing wrong with having an opinion, what is wrong (in my opinion) is the way you phrased it. He made a genuine plea for help, and you just jumped on him, rather than helping with the question asked. Oh, and a little rule of thumb I live by: "don't dish it out, if you can't take it in." It all boils down to: why should we discourage people from making Futurama sites? Some of those we have now is bound to die sooner or later, wouldn't it be great if new sites were ready to take their place when that happen? I don't recall anyone telling Andie Planet Express.dk were all we needed as a general site, when he told about his plans to relaunch CGEF. Everybody supported mArc when PEEL came back, even though The Hip Joint was around. If people want to make a Futurama site, I say go for it! If it's good, awesome. If it's less good, awesome that you tried.
|
|
|
|
|
kip
Professor
|
|
What's up with you Kryten, since when is it ok to wave the ban-stick around because you dis-agree with somebody else's opinion?
I could probably see you banning me in a childish retort with some "witty" caption for saying this, but it needs to be said anyway. You seem to be on the war path a lot these days and a lot of your agression is directed at people who don't deserve that heat. Chillout man, same goes for Teral who isn't being so helpy mchelphelpful by adding fuel to the flames.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A
Space Pope
|
|
Originally posted by Margie: i dont think anyone can make better character site than Fry Hole, Leela Zone, OAOB, etc... I disagree. The best Futurama character site ever is Ain't No Such Thing As Too Much Amy Wong. Now, those sites that you mentioned, they're good sites, but they lack the borderline insanity type of devotion to the character that Andy's site has. So, unless you're making an Amy site, you certainly can make a better character site than the ones already made. If you are making an Amy site, you can't make a better one than Andy's, but you should make it anyway, because, after all, there really is no such thing as to much Amy Wong.
|
|
|
|
|