jwso

Delivery Boy
 
|
|
 |
« : 05-21-2000 09:41 »
|
|
Here you can descuss who is yuor favourite webmaster. Who do you think really works hard on their site, who makes good content, who updates often and ect... If possible make a list like the one below. (here's mine) 1. ANDIE http://morefuturama.com 2. JavieR http://tfp.killbots.com 3. JACK http://www.chapek9.com post your opinion 
|
|
|
|
|
|
cruncha-muncha
Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #2 : 05-21-2000 10:26 »
|
|
Here`s mine: 1. Andie of CGEF 2. Jason of CGEF 3. JavieR of TFP -------------------- cruncha-muncha Futuredrama
|
|
|
|
|
HyperLad
Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #3 : 05-21-2000 13:22 »
|
|
Heres mine... [1] JavieR Sanchez at The Futurama Point for his great consideration for Other people and Other Sites. [ The Futurama Point ] [ http://tfp.killbots.com ] [2] Josh Wheatley at CGEF/MHH for his friendlyness and hard work, and his updates are good. [ CGEF ] [ http://www.morefuturama.com ] [ MHH ] [ http://slurm.morefuturama.com ] [3] Andie Similon/Jason Peavey for being great and helping/chatting and doing stuff thats good/ [ CGEF ] [ http://www.morefuturama.com ] and I could go on all day, I think all the webmasters are coool! mmm.... donuts
|
|
|
|
|
|
RideTheWalrus

Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #5 : 05-22-2000 00:51 »
|
|
Thanks for the comments Dave. Personally I would have to say 1)Andie (yeah, he is no.1) of CGEF, for firstly letting me work at Futuraweb/ CGEF. I would not be here if it wasn't for him. 2)Marcelo of FLA - http://fla.killbots.com for really helping me out in almost everything. 3) Ruben of FeE - http://www.zoidberg.com.ar i don't think I should go any longer, in rank, but I also would like to mention the following people --- Jason Peavey (CGEF), jwso and yuha (NBN), David (Futurama Oscars), mtvdcm (Outlet), Leandro (TLZ), Cherrn (Oscars), Craig (Elite) and the list could go on and on.... i might add some more later---
|
|
|
|
|
Mini Poppler
Guest
|
|
 |
« #6 : 05-22-2000 07:26 »
|
|
I don't have a fav, I just think all the people who work for CGEF are awesome!
P.S. Why is CGEF's url morefuturama.com? shouldn't it be cgef.com or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rubender
Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #17 : 06-05-2000 02:42 »
|
|
It's easy to be the fav webmaster if you make everyone an OP in the chat and give subdomains to anybody.... >  PS: Planet Roadcrap sucks and so do the Oscars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z:o:i:d:b:e:r:G
Delivery Boy
 
|
|
 |
« #19 : 06-08-2000 22:56 »
|
|
Originally posted by Rubender: PS: Planet Roadcrap sucks and so do the Oscars. Would you care to tell me what you have against Planet Roadmap? And what, at all, does your opinion of PR have to do with people's favourite webmasters? And what do you have against the Oscars? By the way - I'd like the address of your site, seeing as how it MUST be so much better than all these other sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rubender
Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #22 : 06-11-2000 22:09 »
|
|
Originally posted by Z :i:d:b:e:r:G: Would you care to tell me what you have against Planet Roadmap? First off, I used to like Planet Futurama(before the merge). I just got pissed off because of Jason Bernabé's attitude when I asked him not to rate my site. I asked him that a long time ago because I though it was completely stupid that he rated sites in a language he can't read. So I said "since you can't read spanish I want to ask you not to rate my site" and he replied "I can't give you a better calification because if I do so everyone's going to ask me to do it" (or something like that). I NEVER asked for a better calification, I asked him not to rate my site. Of course he continue to rank my site with his babelfish-like utility. Later on he hired Leandro to do that. Jason was rating sites he couldn't even read since the Roadmap to the Futurama era. And what, at all, does your opinion of PR have to do with people's favourite webmasters?
Nothing, I just needed to say it. I was way too pissed off. I'm not anymore though (like anyone on Earth cares). And what do you have against the Oscars?
They put my site (and lots of other sites too) in their ranking under this Message Board. This MB is cool and everything but it is a CGI SCRIPT!! NOT A SITE. So I take that as an insult. What kind of person thinks a CGI SCRIPT made by Infopop Corporation (!!!) is better than good Futurama sites made by Futurama fans? The Fan-o-Rama Newsletter is also above lots of sites, and guess what. it is an EMAIL! Yeah, I like the FFOR NL but it's not a site. The whole ranking is stupid. I'd like to know which one of the webmasters of the Oscars reads spanish, 'cause Futurama Latinamerica (which is a great site but I don't think it's the fourth best site on the net) is on the fourth position right under CGEF, TFO and FRCR. Note: JavieR reads spanish but he only made the old desing of the Oscars. By the way - I'd like the address of your site, seeing as how it MUST be so much better than all these other sites. [/b] My site can be a piece of crap but it is at least a piece of crap made with dignity. I don't like to play God like some webmasters do. Yes, by "some webmasters" I mean Jason Bernabé, who probably is a great guy, I don't know. Oh, big surprise! My site has been dropped even more at the Oscars! Cool! I want to see how much it takes to be at the bottom. BTW, someone tell them that Ryan Pritch and Matt Douglas are not the webmasters of the FFOR NL. Mainly because newsletters don't have webmasters (they have nothing to do with the FFOR anyway) From the Oscars: Futurama Web review: Good Site but would be better if the content was updated more, and if the webmasters stopped ranting and updating about things that are not even important and we dont give a crap about.
Do they even read their own updates? I've got more. The Futurama Point has moved up from 7th to 5th and The Futurama Web has moved down from 5th to 7th. Futurama en Castellano has moved up from 13th place to 12th and Futurama en Espanol has moved down from 12th to 13th. Much Ado About Futurama has moved up from 17th to 14th and Nothing But Nibbler has moved down from 14th to 17th.
Wow, that many changes in a week? I wonder how do they do this ranking. Do they have a weather based system? I ask this because it looks like this ranking is going to change very often... They also say about my site: "Webmaster(s): Currently Not Stated due to reasons unknown."
Oh, funny. They don't know who am I even though my name is at the bottom of almost EVERY page in my site. But my name is not on the main page, so I wonder if they ever actually visited my site entirely. I don't think so. That's it. I could say more but then this page would take 5 minutes to load. [This message has been edited by Rubender (edited June 12, 2000).]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jbird3000

Bending Unit
  
|
|
 |
« #25 : 06-12-2000 14:34 »
|
|
Originally posted by Rubender: First off, I used to like Planet Futurama(before the merge). I just got pissed off because of Jason Bernabé's attitude when I asked him not to rate my site. I asked him that a long time ago because I though it was completely stupid that he rated sites in a language he can't read. So I said "since you can't read spanish I want to ask you not to rate my site" and he replied "I can't give you a better calification because if I do so everyone's going to ask me to do it" (or something like that). I NEVER asked for a better calification, I asked him not to rate my site. Of course he continue to rank my site with his babelfish-like utility.
B] I obviously didn't say that because "calification" isn't a word that I use (or even exists). And I'm not going to not rank any site. If I only showed some, then it wouldn't be a very good links site, would it? Even before I used the babelfish translator, I could tell which site were good or not. It's not that hard... Look at dates, pictures, episode titles, and you'll figure out how good a site is. Plus I have a basic knowledge of Spanish, aided by the fact the a lot of words in Spanish are similar to English and French (which I am fluent), I can pretty much figure it out. And for Futurama Fan-o-rama and PEEL, I'd have to defend Oscars in their ranking. Sure, the message board may just be a CGI script, but a Futurama site is just HMTL. They both have people working/posting on them. And I find the Futurama fan-o-rama is a very well done newsletter. Made by Futurama fans. So somehow webmaster are better than these people?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rubender
Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #28 : 06-12-2000 19:23 »
|
|
Originally posted by jwso: aaron... i couldn't have said it better myself  We know Jwso, we know...  Just kidding. And to Aaron: I didn't like Jason's attitude. And actually, I never had a problem with the ratings but with the way the sites are rated. I don't think a Message Board (programmed by some unknowm guy) can be better than a site because it is just a communication media (or something like that). - The options are two: or the guys at the Oscars don't read spanish, or they think they read spanish but the don't. If you know Futurama en Argentina, and you read the description for that site at the Oscars then you'll know they CAN'T READ SPANISH. In their old version (the one at CGEF) they said my site was known for giving @leela.com.ar and @fry.com.ar email addresses. I wonder where they got that from, cause I only have a few users of those email addresses. The point is, they just assume things. To Jason 'the puppeteer' Bernabé: This is what you said: "I'd give your site a better rating, but then I'd have ot give all the Spanish sites better ratings because I can't really differentiate." I NEVER asked for a better rating. And how could you rate sites if you couldn't even differentiate? I know some english (despite the fact I make up some words such as "calification"  ) and I've seen my site with babelfish and I can totaly say that what you get is nonsense. The same happens when you do it the other way around (an english site translated into spanish). If the Fan-o-Rama News Letter (which is great, I know) counts as a site, where's alt.tv.futurama then? Huh? I could point out more things but then I'd have to say things I don't want to say, about sites I like. I want to state that I'm not complaining becuase I think my site deserves a better rating. No, is not that. I think the "good" rating at PR is ok. And the position 12 (1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|