coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I'd make a videogame myself if I had any idea how to make videogames.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Or anything really. But I'd go more with RPG than the other two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Nearly a decade on and I'm still totally obsessed with Final Fantasy 7. Imagine the Futurama Universe in a similar framework... the possibilities are endless... But who would be Fry's Sephiroth? There aren't any truly EVIL villians in Futurama to fill that black cape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Yeah... looks cool... but y'know... there's still the *effort* issue to contend with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Mehhhhhh! Can't someone else do it? I'm tired, and there are mice eating my foot...
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I consider them housemates, though technically I'm their tennant.
|
|
|
|
|
HookerBot 5000
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Aww, thats sweet.. *gets prodded with taser* Aww, dats shooo schweet... Off topic, sorry, do apologise. I think there should be another Futurama game, I mean, the first one is amazing. I could never tire of it Are there any plans in the works?
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Not according to google, no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Kings who build their opulent palaces, gardens and mausoleums on the banks of a river of nothingness, will inevitably fall headlong into that nothingness and will be as nothing themselves. We live in an age of transience. The kings of today will rattle their begging cups on the street tomorrow. And perhaps this is as it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Cool TLF, and WHAT the hell was I talking about in the previous post there? I don't remember writing that.... I must have been drunk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Oh, there will be, if I have anything to say about it! ...which I clearly don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
As mentioned at great length before, I hope for a new Futurama game with more free-roaming exploration aspects as seen in The Simpsons: Hit & Run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
New New York would, I think, be a lot more fun to run amok in than Springfield. You'd have flying cars and stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
|
« Reply #311 on: 01-06-2007 09:35 »
« Last Edit on: 01-06-2007 09:35 by coldangel_1 »
|
|
Originally posted by ZoidZoid: I agree, a futurama style Hit and Run would be great.
Though if there is a new game I hope that it would be more challenging that the existing one which I found to be too easy. Yes, indeed. And, because I'm a rather demanding bastard, I'd like there to be some Role Playing elements involved, especially with character interactions. Like selecting responses to questions and such to build or demolish relationships with the rest of the cast. Originally posted by HookerBot 5000: Actually, I would love a new Futurama game with more or less the same format. I cant remember what its called (platform?) but I much prefer going through places systematically rather than just aimless wandering. I played a bit on Grand Theft Auto, and that really annoyed me, cause all I was doing was killing people and picking up girls randomly. Yawn. Haha. It's not really lilke that - there is a plot and missions and all, but the freedom to take a breather from the story and go sightseeing is really very welcome to most gamers. GTA is geared more toward randomness than other imitators though - have you played The Simpsons Hit & Run? It's different when everything's comedy-orientated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Yes well the 'freedom' element doesn't necessarily imply aimlessness (though many take great pleasure in exploring the locales or doing stunts in vehicles). What usually happens is there are all kinds of side-missions/races/jobs and hidden extras to be found at one's leisure that don't need to be done in order to finish the story section of the game, but add replay value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Did you ask them if they could order it for you?
|
|
|
|
|