|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
roam_ili

Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #20 : 02-26-2003 09:34 »
« : 02-26-2003 09:34 »
|
|
Cool, thanks for posting that link. Looks nice, but I think they could still make it better. Some of the cel-shading looks a little rough, but still good. I can't listen to sound right now, but I'm sure that the original voices are going to be used, and that's definitely going to be a plus (it was the only real high point in those recent simpsons' games). As an 'avid gamer', I think that they could work on a few things, i.e. more consistant frame rate, and hopefully more variety. Looks kind of Crash bandicoot-ish with the platforming and all. And I think the camera is too close, cause fry looks huge. But I'm just nitpicking, cause I love Futurama, and I love video games =)
|
|
|
|
|
Mike!

Bending Unit
  
|
|
 |
« #21 : 02-26-2003 13:24 »
|
|
Wow, those graphics look truly terrible.. It's got nothing to do with them being cell-shaded - they're just horribly jagged. Games like Zelda: The Wind Waker show how well cell-shading can be done, but, yet again, it looks like the game's creators have taken the opportunity of making easy money by doing a rush job on a licence that's bound to sell quite well on the name alone (like with all the terrible Simpsons games). The fact that it's more likely than not been made for the PS2 and then ported to the XBox and GameCube will mean that the graphics will stay sub-par on all systems.
I know that graphics aren't everything, blah blah blah, but in this day and age, jagged graphics like this are unacceptable. I imagine that it will play horribly, too, being a cheap licenced game, but no doubt I'll buy it, play it, and return it, what with it being a Futurama game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|