My line tracings into "art"

[on:]

I chopped apart 3 scenes from various episodes.  I think it turned out pretty good.

I guess this would be my first scan art.  What do you think?  The hands just fell where they did through luck/pure skill.

[Reply #1 on:]

I was going to do that... actually I'll take it further... hehe

[Reply #2 on:]

Although somewhat strange, it's a very good picture. Good job, McGrady

[Reply #3 on:]

I think you did a fantastic job McGrady...

[Reply #4 on:]

Yowza. Either that's really hot, or frighteningly narcicistic.

[Reply #5 on:]

*applauds*
Thank you so very much. I have a horrible headache, I'm in a bad mood, and I have insomnia, but you've just made my night a little better.

[Reply #6 on:]

This is very nice work. I love this

[Reply #7 on:]

@ Mcgrady
Dude, that is just... disturbing...
But good work.
 
@ FemJesse
I anticipate being stunned on s-o-o-o many levels when I see your, er, treatment of this particular... subject.
From what I've seen so far, regardless of content, you do mighty fine work.
I, on the other hand, can't draw a straight line...
<Bender>
Oh your God!
</Bender>

[Reply #8 on:]

Unca Dave could only wish he'd thought of that.  Instantly my new wallpaper, word.

[Reply #9 on:]

Parralel Leela ditching Parralel Fry for the parralel version of herself? Well, this picture's bound to cause some small controversy, but - like I said before - you did a very good job. Got any more scanarts coming up, McGrady?   

[Reply #10 on:]

That is very cool McGrady 

Can't wait to see how much further Jesse will take it 

[Reply #11 on:]

Uh, yeah - reguarding how much further FemJesse will take it - I am now accepting bets! Roll up and start your betting, here at Beamer's scanart betting palace! 

[Reply #12 on:]

Thats very ummm... interesting.     

[Reply #13 on:]

Oh my poor christian morals...

[Reply #14 on:]

Archonix - aren't you the person who started that topic all about what's morally right in scanarts? You had a topic asking us just how far you could go, and what would be considered morally correct, because you wanted to stretch the boundaries here further than you did in a Simpsons community. Now, of you follow a religion that dictates your morals to you - WHY did you start a topic asking us how far you could go?

I mean, it's obvious that our acceptable standards here go further than your "poor christian morals" - so why did you need to ask us if we'd consider your art perverted if YOU can't even stomach a computerised image of a woman kissing her parralel self?

I don't mean to be offensive here or anything - I just want to know why you felt the need to ask us how far you could go with your scanarts if you had morals as strong as these.

[Reply #15 on:]

Aww come on, even without a roll-eye smiley you should have been able to see the sarcasm in that. 

[Reply #16 on:]

Leela 1 is poking Leela A in the eye... now she'll be totally blind

[Reply #17 on:]

Good idea, McGrady.

Although I saw FemJesse's take on this very interesting concept first that's still a class-A scan.