Anyone want to help me make some Futurama cards?

[Reply #240 on:]

Lol, thanks for pointing that out will change it

[Reply #241 on:]

[Reply #242 on:]

[Reply #243 on:]

[Reply #244 on:]

Ehm, that's not slurms mackenzy... That's Glurmo I believe

This is slurms:

[Reply #245 on:]

Wow big error from me there lol, thanks for pointing it out will edit it quickly

[Reply #246 on:]

New Slurms:

[Reply #247 on:]

Wow...you have been really productive

Might have one suggestion (I know I start to sound like a real spoilsport):
Robertos's Strength should be at least on Bender's level.
In every confict between these two, Roberto was shown to be the stronger/more intimidating one. A strength below Bender's would rather contradict that rule.

[Reply #248 on:]

Thanks

Good point, the reason for Bender's 9 strength is because of his bending abilities, would Roberto have been able to bend that massive girder like Bender in 'Bendless Love'?

I will probably up Billionaire Bots to 9 though, what do others think?

[Reply #249 on:]

Minor nitpick, but it's "wozzle" not "wazzle".

[Reply #250 on:]

Cheers, will address it.

[Reply #251 on:]

Might up Fnogs intelligence, 3 seems far too low

[Reply #252 on:]

[Reply #253 on:]

Really, really productive. Awesome

Okay, just one point based on the show's observations:

You might contemplate dropping Angelyne's strength to 3, maybe even 2.

"Bendless Love" featured the joke of Manbots and Fembots displaying a ridiculously huge strength difference (which of course did not make much sense for machines, especially since Angelynes arms looked basically like those of the manbots) . Bender and Flexo did bend huge steel bars, while Angelyne looked equally exhausted from doing a rather thin wire dress hanger.

Yet, Angelyne's only strength display (if I remember correctly) was that joke focusing on that ridiculously big gender gap.

[Reply #254 on:]

Yh, 5 seems too high looking back, I think 3 is perhaps more accurate.

[Reply #255 on:]

[Reply #256 on:]

[Reply #257 on:]

Haha love the picture for the big brain!

[Reply #258 on:]

Lol TY, will upload the last 20 over the course of the next couple of days.

[Reply #259 on:]

If anyone has a higher quality pic or knows where one is for Chain Smoker please say, going to have a look later as not happy with his pic.

[Reply #260 on:]

[Reply #261 on:]

Keep em coming man!

[Reply #262 on:]

I like Michelle's stats. She's basically an unlikeable piece of crap on the show, so it's gratifying to see it reflected elsewhere.

[Reply #263 on:]

[Reply #264 on:]

[Reply #265 on:]

"Petunia" is the name. Also, is she really as weak as a head in a jar?

[Reply #266 on:]

Don't know where that extra I come from lol, and yh will probably up it to a 2 then.

[Reply #267 on:]

[Reply #268 on:]

Just wondering which text do people prefer new or old?

[Reply #269 on:]

I would say the new text xD.

[Reply #270 on:]

Cheers

[Reply #271 on:]

Beholder is a weird creature to try to fit into the stat system these cards use. Beholders are horrible nightmarish monsters that will seriously ruin your day, but they can't take a physical beating.

[Reply #272 on:]

True

[Reply #273 on:]

Alcazars lazyness level may be a little higher... Also I find fat bot's quote ' oh boy oh boy oh by oh boy' a little funier:D
Gotta love Terry

[Reply #274 on:]

Yh, 7 could well be more accurate and yh I might change fatbots quote to that one

[Reply #275 on:]

[Reply #276 on:]

Sumthings wrung with leela's card...

[Reply #277 on:]

Hmmm not sure why, I have the new version of all the cards uploaded on photo bucket, will get the link for Leela

[Reply #278 on:]

[Reply #279 on:]