|
|
|
|
|
km73

Space Pope
   
|
|
Have you seen his first thread also? http://www.peelified.com/Futurama-Forum-6/Topic-12711-0-a_noobs_first_attempt_at.htmlAww..Ess: I don't remember thinking you "overdid the shippy stuff" in most of your early work. It was always suitably subtle and appealingly ambiguous. To me, anyway. Also 'tis cool that you're still working on some renderings, you're obviously using your eye for photography, on those talents as well. Did you find out any more about the Australia job yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
soylentOrange

Urban Legend
  
|
|
*bump* I didn't really know where to post this, but this seemed as good a place as any. Those of you that have been around for awhile might remember a PEELer named Corvus who, back in the day, used to post fanfics on this forum. He doesn't visit PEEL anymore, but I've been acting as his beta reader, and so I've read what he's written since he left. All of his stuff is really good, but his latest fic, The First Day , is so good that I wanted to make you guys aware of it. Go read it. Morbo demands it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tachyon

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Very cool! What are the approximately sizes of the postulated stars in the scenario?
Given that scenario, would the axes of the various GRBs tend to be more likely to be orthogonal to the galactic disc, and therefore less likely to be seen from Earth than if the orientation were random?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tachyon

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Then for us to see as many GRBs as we do, given the narrow beamwidth, jillions of them must have gone off.
Neat stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
soylentOrange

Urban Legend
  
|
|
Neat animation. What is the goal of your thesis with respect to GRBs?
You, knew, just knew, that some day those fanboy futurama computer animations would come in useful,didn't you?
I'm trying to improve the emission models by generating 3D simulations of the pre-burst environment. Basically, I build a star in a computer and then blow it up. But yes, I knew the fanboy stuff would come in handy. I did those futurama models to gain some experience so I could make these simulations for work. Then for us to see as many GRBs as we do, given the narrow beamwidth, jillions of them must have gone off.
Neat stuff!
Well, we detect these things about once a day. The opening angle of the jet is only a fraction of a degree (as seen from Earth) due to relativistic effects, so the odds that we'll see any one GRB are practically nil, and that ignores the fact that we miss some of them that are pointed our way because our instruments aren't very good. So yeah, there are alot of them. Makes sense though. If there are a hundred billion galaxies with a hundred billion stars each, then that's going to result in alot of exploding stars, even if only a fraction of stars are massive enough to blow up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|