SpaceGoldfish fromWazn

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« Reply #160 on: 11-12-2011 16:09 »
« Last Edit on: 11-12-2011 16:17 »
|
|
I heard that Ryan Reynolds was going to become obsessed with Peter.
I was hoping that he'd become absolutely fascinated with him as a character and sort of enjoy him like the audience enjoys the show, if you get me. All very meta. Maybe seeing through him somewhat like Frank Grimes did with Homer Simpson.
Instead he just had gay feelings for him which wasn't as interesting or clever or even funny as the story I'd created in my head, so I was sorely disappointed by it all.
Ugh, I hated Homer's Enemy, and I would hate it even more if Peter replaced Homer. I can see what they did, and I have to admit the idea of subverting the usual "Happy ending" with a downer and how a realisticish human would survive (or not) in Springfield, it just ended up being excessively humorless and mean spirited, black comedy without the comedy. Watching Homer essentially destroy what little another human being had left (both literally and metaphorically) wasn't good or funny viewing. Whenever I ever see that episode, I just think Frank Grimes shouldn't have even bothered saying Homer's life, because the latter is just so ridiculously selfish and buffoonish in a (then) OOC way. (in fact it I now view it as a prematurely early sign of the show's decline: randomly abrupt ending, sacrificing heart for cheap, unfunny gags, and Homer being a ridiculously selfish, moronic buffoon rather then an inept but sweet natured idiot whose heart is always in the right place). And considering how Peter is like Homer's negative traits times 10, watching a "Peter's Enemy" would make me want to throw my television set out the window. I do agree with you about the gay part though. Why the hell would any attractive, handsome man be ever interested in a complete failure as a human being as Peter? (At least Lois makes sense because she's a complete bitch now, and is a chubby chaser).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cyber_turnip

Urban Legend
  
|
|
I heard that Ryan Reynolds was going to become obsessed with Peter.
I was hoping that he'd become absolutely fascinated with him as a character and sort of enjoy him like the audience enjoys the show, if you get me. All very meta. Maybe seeing through him somewhat like Frank Grimes did with Homer Simpson.
Instead he just had gay feelings for him which wasn't as interesting or clever or even funny as the story I'd created in my head, so I was sorely disappointed by it all.
Ugh, I hated Homer's Enemy, and I would hate it even more if Peter replaced Homer. I can see what they did, and I have to admit the idea of subverting the usual "Happy ending" with a downer and how a realisticish human would survive (or not) in Springfield, it just ended up being excessively humorless and mean spirited, black comedy without the comedy. Watching Homer essentially destroy what little another human being had left (both literally and metaphorically) wasn't good or funny viewing. Whenever I ever see that episode, I just think Frank Grimes shouldn't have even bothered saying Homer's life, because the latter is just so ridiculously selfish and buffoonish in a (then) OOC way. (in fact it I now view it as a prematurely early sign of the show's decline: randomly abrupt ending, sacrificing heart for cheap, unfunny gags, and Homer being a ridiculously selfish, moronic buffoon rather then an inept but sweet natured idiot whose heart is always in the right place). And considering how Peter is like Homer's negative traits times 10, watching a "Peter's Enemy" would make me want to throw my television set out the window.
I do agree with you about the gay part though. Why the hell would any attractive, handsome man be ever interested in a complete failure as a human being as Peter? (At least Lois makes sense because she's a complete bitch now, and is a chubby chaser).
I'm not someone who thinks that Homer's Enemy is one of the best episodes of 'The Simpsons' by any means - but like you, I appreciate the concept and I thought something similar with Ryan Reynolds not just taking Peter for granted, but being fascinated with how bizarre he is could have made for a brilliant episode. In fact, I still do. I certainly think it would have been better than what we got.
|
|
|
|
|
SpaceGoldfish fromWazn

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: 11-13-2011 02:58 »
« Last Edit on: 11-13-2011 03:06 »
|
|
Oh, I agree. Like him going: "You are a horrible person, you treat everyone around you like dirt, and you seem determined to make your daughter want to kill herself, and seem to derive a sociopathic, gleeful delight in that. Nobody ever calls you on it, even when they're not joining in your singleminded persecution of her. Why do people like you and why do you have a hot wife, despite you taking absolutely no care of your body and you treat her like a comfortable armchair, at best?" Like not in a malicious "you suck" kind of way, but the way a meterologist might be fascinated by ball lightning or st elmo's fire or a particually unusual aurora.
Great concept, really bad execution in every way. Watching Homer destroy a human being, especially one who was as decent and nice as Frank Grimes (despite him having absolutely no reason to be anything other then a jerkass) made for uncomfortable viewing, at best. If the perspective was swapped, we would be rooting for Homer to drink the wall dissolving acid or choke on his lobster, the fat idiot. Black comedy is fine, but there wasn't really enough humor to sweeten the bile and the fact that Homer's genuine decency/heart of gold was on vacation just threw dirt on an already shut coffin. (pun intended.)
Okay. Got (most) of that out of my system, but I would say it's one of only two episodes episode of the "classic" run that I actually disliked, let alone loathed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otis P Jivefunk

DOOP Secretary

|
|
As it will be a while before I see this, I await the responses with feverish anticipation!...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cyber_turnip

Urban Legend
  
|
|
My major complaint is that they changed this episode to a "Road to" episode when it wasn't really. It didn't have the opening titles, the musical number, wasn't directed by the usual guy and so forth - it just felt like a normal episode... but a great normal episode, so I guess, fair enough.
It was a bit of a missed opportunity in that it could have been outstanding, but it was still very good. All the of the stuff that took place in the pilot episode was hilarious, from the 4:3 aspect ratio to the line about Stewie looking like a prize at a Mexican carnival. I can't remember the last time I laughed out loud so much at an episode of any of Fox's Sunday lineup.
And I'm a sucker for time-travel stories so although it did nothing particularly new, I still enjoyed what we got as well as the fun of the CGI sequences - which looked surprisingly good, I have to add.
So yeah, not one of Family Guy's all-time greatest episodes, but still very, very good and their best episode in a long, long while.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otis P Jivefunk

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Looking at peoples reactions, glad it didn't disappoint. So it's a Road To ep eh? Interesting. I always love the Brian and Stewie eps, especially time travel eps...
|
|
|
|
|
Bend-err

DOOP Secretary

|
|
So am I the only one who found the episode to be completely predictable and always had the feeling "that has been done so many times before"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otis P Jivefunk

DOOP Secretary

|
|
I think that idea of classic era Stewie chasing modern Stewie and trying to kill him is a great idea. I for one would support that as a potential plot. Obviously now the moment has kinda passed, but had that been done, it'd have been really cloolsome  ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|