|
|
|
Tweek
UberMod
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I didn't think the last film was too wonderful but that doesn't mean that Bond is unsavable, it is unlikely to happen but I read that Quentin Tarantino would like to remake Casino Royale, sticking as close to the book as possible, I'm sure that would get back Bond to the way it was meant to be instead of one stunt and special effect after another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otis P Jivefunk
DOOP Secretary
|
|
That would be interesting, a hell of lot more interesting than the other Bonds...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capīn Skusting
Liquid Emperor
|
|
It's gonna be good to see Casino Royale finally get the Eon treatment. It was, after all, basically the first Bond novel. Fave Bond over here is Sir Sean. It's a toss up between Goldfinger and Thunderball as my favorite Bond flicks. In the meantime, whilst we wait, we can entertain ourselves with: Make Mine A 007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum Leek
Crustacean
|
|
yeah, i never had an N64 so i didn't get into the whole goldeneye game thing but i've heard it was good. my friend liked it so much that the new game controls of PS2 X-box and even gamecube First person shoot em's are too different. he always uses the Goldeneye control format. wierdo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Without a doubt, Goldfinger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HookerBot 5000
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Well, I guess the graphics are better, as well as the stunts, and,well...it looks new, I guess. though I REALLY didnt like Die Another Day. An invisible car, that stupid 'dream mask' thing. I was not a fan. I love the new one though. Fairly beliveable, and it was good.
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
'A View to a Kill' had the best theme song by far. Duran Duran rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
germanfryfan
The Listmaker
Urban Legend
|
|
|
« Reply #150 on: 11-25-2006 22:52 »
« Last Edit on: 11-25-2006 22:52 »
|
|
"Moonraker" for me, closely followed by "The Man with the golden gun". I dunno, Roger Moore just is my favourite Bond. I just saw Casino Royale 2006 today - never saw the original Casino Royale from 1954 or 1967 though. I rate it a "C". It's an alright Bond and Daniel Craig needs to grow a little more into the role in my opionin. The opening theme (when the title song is played) looks a bit shabby with all its CGI graphics, compared to the movies from the 70ies to 80ies at least. Good thing they used the original version of the Bond Theme as it was used in "Dr. No" for the credits. As for the story: Well it should show the very first Bond job as a 00 ever, it's ok for that. Even though at some points it doesn't quite work together with the other movies. little example: Judi Dench was introduced as the new M in Golden Eye. However, her predecessor had the name M as well. Now Casino Royal explains that "M" somehow relates to her real life name. Q, or his follow up R is missing completely. Instead a bunch of nerds give a 24/7 support via mobile phone. (Then again Q wasn't part of Ian Flemming's books anyhow) What also fell into my eyes is that Sony as the producing company used everything they could to squeeze their products into it. Not only does Bond use a Vaio notebook, but also a Sony Ericsson mobile and his chick even has one of the Walkman mobile phones. Like I said, a "C" for me. It won't ever become one of my favourites, that is for sure. I'd rather watch a Timothy Dalton or a Goerge Lazenby than that and they already did suck.
|
|
|
|
|
CrapBag
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by coldangel_1: Without a doubt, Goldfinger. No questions asked. Connery will always be the Bond. The story of Goldfinger was rather simple, yet entertaining. Not a huge bond fan, but of the ones I have seen, it is by far the best.
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Nobody will ever be able to match Sean. Why, if I wasn't straight.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
It's meant to be a revamp. Like 'Batman Begins'. They've taken the series back to the start... again. I say 'Again', because the old Bonds were set in the 60s and 70s, and if the new post-Cold War generation (Goldeneye onward) were supposed to be the same guy in the same timeline, then he should have been played by someone as old as... well... Sean Connery (that would actually have been cool!). Point being, Goldeneye was a revamp in itself by necessity of age vs historical setting. So it's not a new idea. I had hoped that Casino Royale was gonna be set in the late 1950s like the book, but I guess that would have confused the less intelligent viewers, making them furrow their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation...
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
That is to ignore the recurrence of Ernst Stavro Blofeld and SPECTRE. But it is an interesting theory. Not really backed up by anything (the novels all refer to each other, though the films are vastly different). He does, however, always have the same personality and vices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel
DOOP Secretary
|
|
So I haven't seen the new one yet. Can anyone tell me if Bond FINALLY gets it on with Judi Dench?
|
|
|
|
|