|
|
|
Spacedal11
Space Pope
|
|
Originally posted by DogDoo8: P.S. Just saw a couple of days ago a kind of test/teaser trailer for Pixar's, Ratatouille (2007 RD). Its in french, don't know why. Just google it if your interested. Hmm a movie about a rat who lives in a restaurant. I'd rather see Flushed Away. I'm kind of sick of Disney and Dreamworks producing movies that are the same. Finding Nemo vs. Shark Tale (I finally got to watch most of FN, I liked it) Ants vs. A Bug's Life (Disney's was better) Madagascar vs. The Wild (Madagascar. No competion) Why is it so hard for one of them to come up with a creative idea and the other not steal it?! It's so annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xanfor
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Well, 'Cars' is now in theaters. Anyone see it? Is it good?
Hello?
Echo, Echo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xanfor
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Perhaps they want DreamWorks to rip it off, so this way DreamWorks's one will be so bad they won't be able to make any more. Naa, I know that can't happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xanfor
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Yeah, I read on Wikipedia about it... Seems like they had something funny there... But I'm not going to ruin it for the people who haven't seen it. Pixar has gotten better over the years, you have to admit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i_c_weiner
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Oh yeah, 3D's coming back too. First it'll be Superman Returns 3D, then Star Wars 3D, then it'll be Indiana Jones 3D, and then finally Paul Shore's Next Big Movie 3D. It's a slippery slope!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xanfor
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Remember... 3D is not the same as CGI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DotheBartman
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by Xanfor: Remember... 3D is not the same as CGI.
Oh yeah, I know that. Originally i_c_weiner: Xanfor: When we speak of the Prequel Trilogy, 3D is CGI.
Well, no, not really. A lot of the effects are obviously CGI, but there are still some practical effects and actual filmed actors, and some of that will presumably be presented in 3D. Plus, we're talking about them 3D-izing what's already there, which isn't CGI in and of itself. They're not adding to the effects, though I wouldn't be surprised if Lucas tinkers with all six of them again.
|
|
|
|
|
Xanfor
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Ah, Ok. Sorry. Continue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juliet
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I watched Robots last night and I think it was good. I want to go and see cars. That movie looks cute and enjoyable to watch. ----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
i_c_weiner
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Some movies, like Toy Story and Shrek, were good and had a reason to be in CGI. Monster House could've been life action with things like the house computer generated. Ant Bully probally could've been hand drawn. I miss the days of good hand drawn animated movies. I miss the days of good CGI movies and not a huge amount of crappy ones that ruin the point of CGI.
Some movies, like Spider-Man 3, are live action, but need computer generation to pull off some stuff, but would look cheesy if they were fully CGI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TriggerHappyJim
Professor
|
|
Cars was one of the best movies I think I have ever seen, and the reflections and smoke effects completely took my breath away. Pixar's attention to detail is amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crash_7
Professor
|
|
First I've seen of this topic. I'd say The Incredibles is probably my favorite CGI movie. Only thing I didn't like about it was the god-awful short that preceded it. Everyone raves about how great Cars looks. Nobody ever seems to talk about the story. I see Jimmy Neutron on the list. That was a much better TV series than it was a movie. In fact, I'd say that the made for TV movie, "Win, Lose and Kaboom" was much more entertaining than the original theatrical movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gudbjorg
Liquid Emperor
|
|
This thread seems very similar to the Pixar one, but I guess you can talk about more than just Pixar CGI movies here, looking forward to Toy Story 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melllvar
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I liked Cars too. I've not seen Ratatouille. I love Wall-E too, it's almost perfect. So I'd agreed with the top 3 in Bens list.
|
|
|
|
|