If you Were...

[on:]

...a robot in the Futurama universe, what would you be called?

I'm thinking something like Tuner or Crank. 

[Reply #1 on:]

I'd call myself Turner if I were a robot.  I would also try to impress Bender. 

[Reply #2 on:]

LoserBot 2.0

[Reply #3 on:]

Inquiry Unit QM-228.

Or Gingerbot. Both would be acceptable.

[Reply #4 on:]

LoserBot 2.0

Hehehe awww, you're cute.

"Organizer" or maybe FluffBot

[Reply #5 on:]

NerdBot 3.12, yes definitely so.

[Reply #6 on:]

LoserBot 2.0

Hehehe awww, you're cute.

The 2.0 means I'm refined!

[Reply #7 on:]

Unfortunately, your hardware is also incompatible with the latest updates.

[Reply #8 on:]

Those poor 21st century robot women

[Reply #9 on:]

Those poor 21st century robot women

* Tachyon high-fives Randi!

[Reply #10 on:]

Killbot #1101

[Reply #11 on:]

FroBot 3.0- Now with more fro!

[Reply #12 on:]

Cryodisperser .9

[Reply #13 on:]

Super King.

[Reply #14 on:]

Guinness-bot 5000

[Reply #15 on:]

NuetralBot, The latest in neutral technology.

[Reply #16 on:]

I have no strong feelings one way or another.

[Reply #17 on:]

futuerbot 3000 wood be my name

[Reply #18 on:]

No, no. You'd be Misspellbot come back to agitate us from the past.

[Reply #19 on:]

To be fair, a lot of people from this section of the board would be one of the ever-unpopular "Annoyotron3X" series.

[Reply #20 on:]

Annoyatron?

[Reply #21 on:]

What's with this guys in-ability to spell? I'll let him off if he's foreign and isn't good at English. Otherwise...

[Reply #22 on:]

Annoyatron?

That's der bunny.

I love the fact that a gadget so simple to make for yourself is apparantly popular enough with geeks who either don't know how to do it or are fundamentally too lazy that it's commercially viable to mass-produce the thing.

[Reply #23 on:]

BoogierBot 3.3 would be fine. 

[Reply #24 on:]

I would be called Moticom, it's my Quake III name, but it's an old name I came up with when I was like 10 or something and it stuck, I like it, and it kinda sounds like a robot so I'd be called that...

[Reply #25 on:]

LoserBot 2.0

More like HM Bot.

NerdBot 3.12, yes definitely so.

Nerdbot 3.1415926535 would be better.

[Reply #26 on:]

Why stop at 10?

LoserBot 2.0

More like HM Bot.

?????



edit: I get it now. But LoserBot sounds way cooler.

[Reply #27 on:]

Why not Tau?

[Reply #28 on:]

Frankie Muniz.

[Reply #29 on:]

LoserBot 2.0

More like HM Bot.

Just a Hot Meal?  Why do I have to pay?

I just now got it.  Duh.

But LoserBot sounds way cooler.

Awwwww.

I'm still waiting to see one on the show.

Also, damn it.  I'm refined!

[Reply #30 on:]

I know you are. Don't worry, I always got your back. And front.

[Reply #31 on:]

 I'd be HobbyBot I of course.


Now all I need is a hobby.

[Edit] Or, if pretentiousness is required, I could be iHobbyBot

[Reply #32 on:]

I'm holding out for the iHobbyBot 2.

[Reply #33 on:]

It's got a built-in camera.

[Reply #34 on:]

I thought it had 3?

[Reply #35 on:]

Two cameras, and a mic.

[Reply #36 on:]

* futurefreak applauds

Bravo my young padawan!!

[Reply #37 on:]

sex bot 5000

[Reply #38 on:]

* futurefreak applauds

Bravo my young padawan!!

Thank you, thank you!

[Reply #39 on:]

This bump has been brought to you by BumpBot 2.6.1.