To Kill a Waterfall... but how?

[on:]

Here's the deal.

This thread should never have been born. Cubert's a snot, but not deserving of death.

Now that the thread faces death itself, it's time to discuss how the various members of the waterfall clan have met their ends...

..not the ones we've seen. The ones we've not seen. Such as Moderately Priced Waterfall Snr, who was born in 2437, and died at the age of fifty-two. He fell to his death from the top floor of the skyscraper which stood at the centre of his capitalist empire, whilst defending the rights of shoppers to enjoy low, low prices without being forced to pay high, high support costs. The fifteen members of the board who were also in the room each claimed credit for pushing him, and were each sentenced to serve one fifteenth of a twenty-five year prison sentence for one fifteenth of a murder.

I'm not sure how popular this will be compared to bumping off Cubert, but at least y'all will have a place to indulge your twin passions for sadism and violence.

[Reply #1 on:]

I don't know who the fuck this guy is, but I'm all for killing him.

We shove batteries in his eyes.

Thanks for the tip.

Waterfall Crow.

He threw an orange at a pimp and the pimp took some batteries then shoved them in eyes.

[Reply #2 on:]

*psst* You have to create a Waterfall before you kill them.

[Reply #3 on:]

We are gathered here to mourn *not* the death of Waterfall the 1st, born in 2012.  He died from Bone-itis, for which a cure was discovered 6 days after his death. 

P.S. Have you ever looked back at this thread and thought "Oh my gosh, what kind of demented perverts are we in that we came up with hundreds of ways to kill one person?"

[Reply #4 on:]

 

Originally posted by PazuzuJr:
I had an idea for the next thread - think of someone else we all really hate - it would be a bit of a change...

I am SO going to kill you, Pazuzu!!!

[Reply #5 on:]

1) I think that DISCUSSION is needed before just deciding what person the thread should be about
2) What did the Waterfall family ever do wrong?
3) what's wrong with killing cubert again?

and @ RDR - i didn't think anyone would acctually make the thread without confering.

and I'm sorry that i gave the initial idea for this thread since i just find it ... pointless

[Reply #6 on:]

<an exerpt from the 2831 NNY Times, obituary section>

On June 14th, 2831, Costly G. Waterfall, famous for sucessfully lobbying congress to ban violent videogames, was found dead in his Manhattan apartment.  Witnesses report that he was ambushed, beaten, and then brutally murdered by a pack of sentient rpg's, which were angry with their forced unemployment.  If this story can be verified it will make Mr. Waterfall the first verifiable victim of videogame violence.

[Reply #7 on:]

What was wrong with the Cubert thread?

THANKS, Pazuzu

[Reply #8 on:]

 

Originally posted by Decapodian:
THANKS, Pazuzu

I didn't make this thread. say 'THANKS TNUK.'

[Reply #9 on:]

Nah, that's okay, Pazuzu. Let's stop spamming this thread now. It'll die, because nobody will be posting; we'll all be mourning the lost Cubert thread. Why don't you get people's respect back and create a new Cubert thread, Pazuzu?

[Reply #10 on:]

I would apart from the fact that it would get closed since there is this thread... Would it be ok to?

[Reply #11 on:]

 

Originally posted by PazuzuJr:
I would apart from the fact that it would get closed since there is this thread... Would it be ok to?

I dont know...
TNUk probably does though. Ask him...

[Reply #12 on:]

Clearly this thread it dying. The how to kill cubert thread had over 10 posts a day. This how it to a waterfall thread has had no real posts in 5 days. Some one PLEASE make a cubert thread. This one is crud. No offence TNUK.

[Reply #13 on:]

to be honest, I don't know what this one is about, I literally picked one at random
 

[Reply #14 on:]

I'll make a new Cubert thread!

[Reply #15 on:]

Yay!!!!!! go Deca! go Deca! go Deca! *does happy dance!*

[Reply #16 on:]

Now this thread can rest in peace, and we can live happily in the knowledge that we will never see it again.

[Reply #17 on:]

I wasn't sure if it was true, but you've confirmed it for me. Y'all are morons. You'd rather indulge in pointless spam at a six-year-old level than actually contribute to a "game" that requires you to sit back and use a couple of those slowly dying grey cells.

Part of what is killing this site is that threads like "how to kill Cubert" are getting 10+ posts per day (nine and a half out of every ten being pointless, spam, and not entertaining). There will be a point after Futurama's renewal when the on-topic section once again sees thoughful, intellignet debate. I predict that you folks and your ilk will feel as much out of place here then as any of the PEELers who have been here for six or seven years feel in this section at the moment. I do try to return to on-topic every so often, and so do many other long-timers. The sad part is that idiots who find themselves completely unable to think are making it so hard to hold anything like an intelligent discssion that we'd rather spend our time holed up in the off-topic forum, and wait until Futurama is renewed so that we can (eventually) drive the dipshits out by force of numbers (numbers of people who make sense, and actually have something to say).

Lord it over the on-topic section whilst you can, ye of little brain. One day, on-topic will be reclaimed.

:: swooshes cape and leaves in a dramatic fashion ::

[Reply #18 on:]

All i read was 'blah blah blah' and some words of some-one trying to be clever.

i don't see how a thread made by you about killing some-one no-one hates, is any better than a fun thread where people chat about killing some-one they hate.

 

Originally posted by totalnurduk:
The sad part is that idiots who find themselves completely unable to think are making it so hard to hold anything like an intelligent discssion that we'd rather spend our time holed up in the off-topic forum, and wait until Futurama is renewed so that we can (eventually) drive the dipshits out by force of numbers

And to that all i have to say is - good luck - cause i (and i'm sure many other PEELers) aren't goping ANYWHERE, anytime soon!

Now let's take the wisdom of RDR and let this thread die as we ejoy ourselves in 'All your dreams come true... Killin cubert V2' 

[Reply #19 on:]

Not that I want you guys to leave, but he did make some good points. This thread could be much more intelligent, funny, and interesting than another Cubert thread.

[Reply #20 on:]

but it's the same thing - just a different person.

[Reply #21 on:]

 

Originally posted by PazuzuJr:
All i read was 'blah blah blah' and some words of some-one trying to be clever.

I don't need to try.
 

i don't see how a thread made by you about killing some-one no-one hates, is any better than a fun thread where people chat about killing some-one they hate.

Well that's just it, isn't it? You fail to see, because you're sitting there with your eyes closed. I think that the operative word in that segment is "chat". PEEL is not a chatroom, and the thread is nothing more than a conversation between a bunch of not-very-imaginative people about npt-very-much at all. It's spam.
 

And to that all i have to say is - good luck - cause i (and i'm sure many other PEELers) aren't goping ANYWHERE, anytime soon!

Goping? Hey, I don't want you to go, or to gope (whatever that is) for that matter. I want you to grow a fewe brian cells, stay, and take part in some intelligent, witty discussion. Please note that the thread about killing Cubert does not enter either of those categories.
 

Now let's take the wisdom of RDR and let this thread die as we ejoy ourselves in 'All your dreams come true... Killin cubert V2'   

Wisdom. Yeah. Wisdom. 

This thread will die, yes. Because I'm going to request that a moderator lock it to avoid further spam. As I will also be doing with regard to the thread about killing Cubert.

If you truly beleive that it is a worthwhile part of PEEL that is properly justified, and not a poorly-disguised spamfest serving little purpose other than to increase postcounts then you have nothing to worry about, do you?