|
|
|
EvilLunch

Professor

|
|
Okay. I haven't seen this episode in a while. But Yancy looks very much like Fry- Just because they don't have quite the same hair doesn't mean their resemblance is diminished. I hate to rationalize something so absurd.. But in the continuity, Fry's parentage is entirely plausible. I haven't heard anything that totally refutes it.
|
|
|
|
|
probulater

Crustacean

|
|
it was just somthing i typed ignore it
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCC Fred

Space Pope
   
|
|
Originally posted by Shadowstar:
Also that Enos' name isn't Yancy, which Fry's father claimed to be. Actually Fry's dad told Fry's brother "Son, your name is Yancy, just like me, and my grandfather, and so on, all the way back to minute-man Yancy Fry, who blasted Commies in the American Revolution." He doesn't mention his own father (Fry's grandfather).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasty Pasty

DOOP Secretary

|
|
But Yancy Sr. was only talking about ancestors with the name "yancy". not Enos. I admit there might be connection, but im not totally sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary

|
|
Coincidence. If you'll notice, Mildred did have the same color hair as Yancy Sr.
|
|
|
|
|
EvilLunch

Professor

|
|
Yancy and his wife would have equal genetic bearing on what their son would look like even if that son were also the father's father. I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Allen

Professor

|
|
I believe it was established that red hair is recessive and brown hair is dominant. This means that the grandmother's genes for brown hair will show over Fry's genes for red hair. However Fry himself had a much better chance of getting red hair. With each child born, the possibilities become greater for a kid who shows recessive traits/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bushmeister

Professor

|
|
Originally posted by boxie: Interesting to note - my uncle and aunt have brown hair. They have three children, two with red hair, one with blond. That just raises further questions!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasty Pasty

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Originally posted by boxie: I had a theory, but I blinked and it squeezed out of my brain... Fry: "Wait a second! I'm getting an idea! Ye, no, false alarm, no, yeah, no, yeah, no, wait, no, yeah, yeah, no, no....YES!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boxie

Bending Unit
  
|
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: 04-13-2004 15:33 »
« Last Edit on: 04-13-2004 15:33 »
|
|
Here's what the artical says for those too lazy... Even assuming time travel were possible, a person becoming his or her own ancestor would be very unlikely, although not impossible. For sexual reproduction to work, a person's chromosomes are split into two sets. In women, these are stored in eggs; in men, sperm. The two halves are joined during conception to create the genetic template for the new individual. For someone to become their own ancestor, the exact same set of chromosomes must be passed down through the generations. In Fry's case, for example, the sperm that conceived his father would have contained all the genes Fry already received from his father. Then, when Fry's father mated with Fry's mother, the sperm that conceived Fry would have had the identical genetic makeup as the one that conceived Fry's father. The odds against this are staggering. And for each generation removed, it becomes more unlikely, because the exact same genetic code must be passed down through the generations or the ultimate result, in this case Fry, will not be genetically identical to himself, creating a paradox. But since Fry is his own grandfather, his sperm beat the odds twice. Imagine if Fry went back to the middle ages or Roman times to conceive an ancient ancestor. The same sperm variation would have to be passed down 100 times, and that just doesn't happen, considering complexity of our genetic material.
Basically, what you said, canned eggs. Note the use of mated. Made me laugh anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|