|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zombiesaurus

Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #9 : 12-22-2004 06:40 »
« : 12-22-2004 06:40 »
|
|
But he didn't get too much cash when he hocked his body. Not enough to warrant a monocle, in my opinion. Hold on. I just twigged. They inceased the speed of light in the future. Perhaps they increase the maximum percentage of something too? 130% as maximum, maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soidberg

Poppler

|
|
 |
« #16 : 12-23-2004 19:21 »
|
|
Originally posted by Trchri: Okay, I appologize to the ones who followed me so diligently. I have a confession to make: the impurity would not be added to the total, it would be part of the total. He'd be .04% nickel, and 99.96% everything else. A small detail, but if I'm gonna be so precise, I gotta go all the way.
The new figures look like this:
39.99% Zinc 39.99% Titanium 29.99% Iron 39.99% Dolemite 00.04% Nickel Impurity
Now it works. Luckily it was a percent that could easily be spread amongst the other percentages. Now, the proportion is using 150% and these new percentages. Here's the new weights:
139 lbs 15.44 ounce Zinc 139 lbs 15.44 ounce Titanium 104 lbs 15.44 ounce Iron 139 lbs 15.44 ounce Dolemite 2.239 ounce Nickel
Sorry for overlooking that.
I hereby approve these new numbers.
the weight of the different types of metal is all wrong!!!! You have detrminated the weight of the different metals just from the procentual value. The metals has Still has different density!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|