|
|
Dr. Morberg
Professor
|
|
Yeah, I went for four too, as we want it to go out with a bang, not a fizzle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Simpsons made 9 good seasons before heading south, DS9 made 7 amazing seasons and could've continued for at least 1 more season, so I'll give it 5 more seasons (whch would still be less episodes than DS9 overall).
|
|
|
|
|
newhook_1
Urban Legend
|
|
|
« Reply #5 on: 03-30-2004 19:17 »
« Last Edit on: 03-30-2004 19:17 »
|
|
Personally I'm going to say one. That should be enough time to tie up the loose stoyrlines, have one or two emotional episodes, a few more "Just for a laugh" ones, and then end it with the ultimate shippy ep. As much as I lve the show, I think it would go downhill in a huge way going into the 6th season.
You can see the writing starting to faluter a bit in production season four. Remebember this is just my opinion, and I'm talking in relation to the rest of the series, not everything else on TV:
Basically in season four you had four fantastic episodes which where, "Bender Should Not Be Allowed On TV", "The Why Of Fry", "The Sting", "The Farnsworth Parabox".
Four episodes that where a little disjointed, but had fantastic endings, "The Devil's Hands Are Idle Playthings", "Jurassic Bark", "Leela's Homeworld", and "Love & Rocket"
The other ten ranged from ok, to horrible in terms of Futurama as a whole ("Where No Fan Has Gone Before" rank higher for some, but I'm not a big Star Trak fan).
Now, I think that they would be able to pump out one more season like season four in terms of quality, but by the end of the shows run, it seemed like they where running low on ideas, which is why I think season six would see a major quality drop off. After a fifth season a movie would probably be the best way to go so they could use some more complex story ideas that can't fit into 22 min. With that in mind though, I really want my four more fantastic episodes.
*Edit* That being said, if they shuffled the executive producers to keep the ideas fresh, like on the Simpsons, I'd give it another three or four. Dave and Matt probably dislike and would therefore reject some ideas that fans would love. Just listen to the commentary for "Time Keeps On Slipping" to see what I mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gorky
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I'd say about 4 or 5 more seasons. This is because most shows can survive and still be great after 9 years, and I would want the show to end after nine good years.
|
|
|
|
|
Anarchist
Professor
|
|
Being on the optimistic side, I'd give it 6 more seasons. 10 seasons is a nice number to end it on, and Futurama still has a lot of untapped potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zoidyzoid
Professor
|
|
Originally posted by newhook_1: As much as I lve the show, I think it would go downhill in a huge way going into the 6th season. Agreed. I'd rather Futurama stay cancelled than be brought back and deteriorate. Originally posted by newhook_1: You can see the writing starting to faluter a bit in production season four. Remebember this is just my opinion, and I'm talking in relation to the rest of the series, not everything else on TV Also agreed. Season 4 was by far the least consistent season in my opinion. Originally posted by newhook_1: Basically in season four you had four fantastic episodes which where, "Bender Should Not Be Allowed On TV", "The Why Of Fry", "The Sting", "The Farnsworth Parabox".
On your actual choice of episodes though, I strongly disagree. Bender Should Not Be Allowed on TV is possibly my least favourite Futurama eppisode ever (definitely bottom 2), and I was disappointed with The Why of Fry. I agree that The Sting and The Farnsworth Parabox were good though. Originally posted by newhook_1: Now, I think that they would be able to pump out one more season like season four in terms of quality, but by the end of the shows run, it seemed like they where running low on ideas, which is why I think season six would see a major quality drop off.
Yep. For me though, another season at the same quality level of season 4 would be disappointing, and probably not worth it. I'd hate for Futurama to leave me with a sour taste. Originally posted by newhook_1: That being said, if they shuffled the executive producers to keep the ideas fresh, like on the Simpsons, I'd give it another three or four. Dave and Matt probably dislike and would therefore reject some ideas that fans would love. I can't say I agree with that. I don't think Futurama would have the right feel without David Cohen.
|
|
|
|
|
Nasty Pasty
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I'd give it another 4 seasons. I really do not want to see it end up like the Simpsons after 15 seasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y_L_B
Professor
|
|
I say six. Like anarchist said, Futurama has a lot of untapped potential. Ten seasons is a good number to end on, in my opinion. But if it started to get crappy before then, I would put it out of it's misery right away. Maybe make up for any episodes that were truly bad, and then just let it go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zoidyzoid
Professor
|
|
Originally posted by newhook_1: I'm not talking about having David and Matt completely out of the picture, I'm talking about situation like season three and four of the Simpsons. Matt and David would still be involved in the show's development and the writing meetings, they just wouldn't be the show runners who approve the episodes themselves. I see, fair enough. I'm not familiar with what happened with The Simpsons, so that's why I misinterperated your suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bushmeister
Professor
|
|
Four more seasons sounds like a reasonable amount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|