|
slimmyCGEF
Administrator
Liquid Emperor
|
|
shouldn't these ideas be like errr, told to everyone, you just don't open a post to tell people you have an idea... I HAVE A DREAM for the rest go fish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iliketowankalot
Professor
|
|
Southpark made a movie and it was great so I don't see why Futurama couldn't do it. If they had a movie they could show all the stuff that Fox censors won't allow like A Tale of 2 Santas
[This message has been edited by iliketowankalot (edited 07-02-2001).]
|
|
|
|
|
Zoidy_want_Balloon
Crustacean
|
|
I think it would probably suck, A full length feature would ruin Futurama.Besides they would make a Simpsons one before they would make a Futurama one.
|
|
|
|
|
Apathy Party
Delivery Boy
|
|
How could they make a Simpsons film? The characters are too shallow and the Simpsons' humour is very short term- it often begins to wear thin even by the end of the episode.
Although the SP film was inspired at times, it was ultimately a dissapointing, overly-long song and dance routine that didn't sustain. If something works for 20 minutes, why stretch it to 95?
And futurama isn't like the X-files or Star Trek- it's a sitcom, not a drama with coherent, constant plot that you can hang a film around.
Having said that, an uncut Futurama would be the coolest thing imaginable. F always pushes the envelope. As the author of the great Ain't No Such Thing As Too Much Amy Wong site said, Why Must I Be A Crustacean In Love contains a vast amount of masturbation gags, but they can get away with it, because it's done by a cartoon lobster man. And Bender's child abuse in Cyberhouse Rules would never be tolerated by a 'real' character. Oh boy, I want to see Two Santas. If they banned it, then it MUST be cool! However, they don't need a film to do this- they could do it on a video.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bart182
Professor
|
|
1) I thought the SP movie was great! 2) The simpsons are making a film (sometime in 2006) and I think it will be ok. A Simpson film is needed for all us die hard fans. 3) Futurama is going to have a film. Matt Groening already said that when he was making Futurama with David that he planned on making 3 Futurama films. They just haven't gotten that far yet in the making of it. And I don't think there will be a Futurama movie BEFORE a Simpsons movie. So that means we might have to wait 11 years for a Futurama if they even make it that long without getting booted.
|
|
|
|
|
Airman
Crustacean
|
|
I agree with frozen fry I think that they should make a movie whenever the sitcom is done. Cause I just don't think that a movie during the sitcom is a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bob_14
Crustacean
|
|
i'd like to see a futurama movie!
|
|
|
|
|
Sarge
Professor
|
|
Kennedy, you sound like a Fox forum poster.
I'd like to see both a Simpson movie, & a Futurama movie, but they gotta have the best writers available. And the layout crews for both shows would have to do them 'when the TV shows are DONE'. Compare Simpsons season 6 animation & color & designs with season 1. Notice a big difference? Well, imagine if a brand new layout crew were thrown together for the sole purpose of doing the film while the TV show layout crew were still working on the TV show. That movie would look worse than season 1. It would look as bad as a Tracy Ullman short. It takes years to get a whole crew practiced enough to get the characters fairly on model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarge
Professor
|
|
About 1/3 of any Groening movie would be music, & that's a big profit for Fox. So, you'll have 2/3 story & 1/3 music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drippy_taco
Professor
|
|
Originally posted by Ainoth: I don't know whether Futurama would work in a feature film, many good TV-Series made horrible movies.
MST3K, for example, though I loved it, bombed at the box office. I suppose a Futurama movie could stand on it's own but it'd be wobbly, I'm not sure it has enough fans as it should. So I'm not necessarily eager for a movie because the show itself is enough of a prize for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
redrope
Crustacean
|
|
I didnt know they were making a Simpsons movie. Hopefully it doesnt ruin the show. A Futurama movie probably wont happen this early, but it may later. I dont know if it would really be to good though. They would need a really good story.
|
|
|
|
|
mofo37
Crustacean
|
|
I think making a Futurama movie this early would ruin the show. The South Park movie was an exception because even though it was meant to be a mere attempt to milk the franchise before it died, it grew into an opportunity to make a great parable of the stupidity of censorship. But, I digress. Wait on a Futurama movie and let's hope against all hope that the Simpsons movie doesn't eat it.
|
|
|
|
|
Motts
Crustacean
|
|
A Futurama movie could work. I can watch my tapes of the show for hours without getting bored by it, although it's easier to watch when the plot changes every 22 minutes, of course. Besides, the story can take place all over the universe, we can have some cool CGI sequences and maybe we could kill Cubert. "Oh my God, they killed Cubert!" "Bah. So?"
|
|
|
|
|
BumbleBeeTheta
Starship Captain
|
|
|
« Reply #36 on: 08-15-2001 12:20 »
« Last Edit on: 08-16-2001 00:00 by edeltraut »
|
|
Originally posted by Rachel_D: A movie would be no good if it was just like some long episode. They would need a big, exciting storyline. Or maybe a "milestone", something that would change in the series, but not too much. And of course, leave room for sequals. I definitely agree. And being the resident crazy romantic, I think that a real relationship between L&F should be introduced in the movie. Well, maybe not. Personally, I think now that it should happen in Season 5 or 6. But if they wait to make the movie, they could introduce the idea of the relationship entering a different "phase". It could also be used to get more people to watch the TV series. Like, let's say, Kif proposes to Amy in the movie. Well, people would have to watch the TV show to find out what she says. Of course, I'd prefer two different names in place of Kif and Amy's, but that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|