|
|
|
Cube_166

Professor

|
|
I know not all the time. That's why I only written most TV shows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
evan

Urban Legend
  
|
|
Actually, Futurama has less definate endings than most shows on TV. For example, the slow build to a Fry/Leela relationship. Each episode does slightly bring us to a conclusion, but I don't think that they're "self-containing" as most shows are. After all, so many episodes refer to events in previous ones...(The Nibblonians, the Brain Spawn, Fry being his grandfather, Fry/Leela, Amy/Kif, the Robot Devil, etc...)
|
|
|
|
|
Allen

Professor

|
|
Fry: It was just a matter of knowing the secret to all tv shows. At the end of the episode, everything's right back to normal.
Then we have an aerial view of citywide destruction. In a loop. Riiiighhht!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary

|
|
::Beats chee zit over the head with a copy of Luck of the Fryrish::
::Beats CC5 over the head with the Season 1 boxset::
|
|
|
|
|
|
DotheBartman

Liquid Emperor
 
|
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: 06-19-2003 00:34 »
« Last Edit on: 06-19-2003 00:34 »
|
|
Eh, Futurama is clever enough that "most" endings aren't entirely predictable. But if any are, that's just the nature of tv. It wouldn't really work, for a comedy series anyway, for it to NOT go back to the way it was once in a while. What, do you want Leela and Fry permentantly married (well, I know some of the shippers do, but trust me, they'd get bored with it after a while and it would be Jump the shark), Kif and Amy to actually have babies on the show, Fry to actually know about his importance for more then a few episodes, and Bender to actually be a proffesional country singer in the rest of the series? Maybe some of these things sound good in theory, but they'd ruin what "works" for the show too much. Its like when a new character is added, a baby is born, the family moves, etc on other shows. It ruins what "works" too much.
But again, Futurama is too inventive anyway to really complain about it being "predictable".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen

Professor

|
|
Originally posted by BNLbum: Did I not make it perfectly clear that I was being blatantly sarcastic?
Obviously not. Otherwise, he wouldn't have said that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gurlugon500

Crustacean

|
|
If Futurama had twists and unpredictable turns abound, ppl would also complain. Also, it would be kinda like a soap opera with 'da-da-duummm!' dramatic endings, like Leela actually getting together with Fry. Futurama keeps me laughing so I know they have the right formula.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurrr

Professor

|
|
Time for a rambling rant by yours truly  I just completed an essay on the conventions of comedy and one of the key features of comedy is REPETIVENESS. Jokes are repeated, there are parts of the show that constantly reappear (i.e. the couch in most shows, Homer's 'D'oh!') and everything is self-contained so that everything is resolved by the end of the episode. There is usually no developnment throughout the series but the joy for most people is seeing the same characters in another bizare situation week after week. That's why its called Situation Comedy. It is based on classical forms of narrative and is something that Western audiences have been brought up on so having it play any other way would just be confusing for us. Too much unpredictability not be funny and would put off audiences even more. I'll shut up now.
|
|
|
|
|
Allen

Professor

|
|
This is true, but too much predictability and the whole thing becomes boring and humdrum. A comedy always has predictable elements, but these lay more in the characters themselves than in the various plots.
If the characters were not predictable in some form, you couldn't get to know or love them. The plots of the episode must be fresh. The minute you feel you've seen all this before is the minute a show has run out of ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lurrr

Professor

|
|
You know what they say, there are only seven plots in the world and trick is to just put a different spin on them. We know that Fry, or Bender, or Leela won't die during the episode because that's the rule of all TV shows. But every so often you have to change it to keep it interesting so nowadays lots of shows are using ongoing storylines. It keeps the series fresh and interesting, but used too often can make it difficult to keep up with. btw, I haven't seen The Sting so no plot details 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sil

Professor

|
|
I actually have a confession - I *did* see Leela being a mutant coming, from 'I Second That Emotion,' because you see her parents in the upper left hand corner of the shot where they all gather round Dwayne for the legend of El Chupanibre. But I was given Season 2 as a gift before I got Season 1, so I wouldn't have done otherwise.
I think another thing is that the storytelling is a lot more straightforward generally, which makes those storylines where you *do* have six storylines going at once feel so much more exciting. I'm thinking of 'A Flight To Remember' - that plot felt so alive to me because there were five or six different stories running simultaneously.
Another thing to remember is that by its very nature, some things are going to be predictable - the spoofs and sendups of other things are likely to follow the same structure. Like in that episode when the Countess dies, you know that one of them is going to die because it's a parody of Titanic, and they're obviously not able to kill Bender off. Am I making sense?
But in the totally original episodes which don't have direct outside influences, they are really original. And the more predictable endings invariably have a twist added to them because the writers are aware of the obviousness of the script. Like in 'A Head in the Polls' it's obvious that Nixon is going to get voted in, ostensibly to make way for his future appearances, but they twist it slightly by making his entrance to the White House slightly more unorthodox and so on.
Wow, that was a much longer post than I intended! Sorry about that!
|
|
|
|
|
Lurrr

Professor

|
|
Futurama isn't predictable though. Or it is, but in an unpredictable way. You're thinking in terms of specific plot details. Of course we didn't know from the begining that Leela was a mutant. But we did know that there would be many episodes dealing with her search for her homeworld and that they would turn out to be dead-ends ('A Bicyclops Built for Two', AOII). The fact is just because a programme is predictable doesn't make it unoriginal. A lot of the time the writers have used that predictability to their own advantage (i.e. 'Fry and the Slurm Factory'). You have to admit, for a show that lampoons another genre there has to be an element of predictability for it to be funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sil

Professor

|
|
There's no need to mudsling!
And Lurrr, I totally agree - to lampoon something and not follow the same structure (ie - making it unpredictable) defeats the whole object.
|
|
|
|
|