|
|
|
|
|
|
|
totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
 
|
|
 |
« #47 : 04-29-2013 19:26 »
|
|
DVD movies are very profitable compared to theatrical releases, too. Disney cottoned onto that a while ago, giving rise to the ridiculous number of follow-ups to their big-screen animated hits, like a chain of sequels to The Lion King, and "next-generation" style cash-ins on The Little Mermaid and Cinderella.
One drawback is that people often buy a single copy, then watch it as a large group (and if not all of that group enjoy it, not all of the group are going to buy their own copy).
This has lead to people releasing films and TV series online. Companies like Netflix are now producing their own series, with people downloading or streaming the content that they want to watch, and more people paying for it (but paying smaller amounts). In the future, we might see more web releases, fewer home-media releases, and more reliance on TVs that are connected to the internet (maybe even fees paid according to the number of people actually watching, or advertisements targeted to a specific group of people who have "signed in" in order to avoid paying to watch their TV).
This is all just speculation, of course. But that's what science-fiction is about. Partially, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheMadCapper

Fluffy
UberMod
DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #49 : 04-29-2013 22:35 »
|
|
Dear Mr. Nuk,
While the direct-to-DVD marketing scheme has worked well for Disney, I must point out that there are differences between Disney's massive empire and the plucky Futurama team.
1 - Disney markets to kids, and to people who fell in love with Disney when they were themselves kids. For generations now, showing your kids Disney movies has been a way of life. Futurama doesn't have that whole "75 years ago your grandmother was a child watching Futurama" angle.
2 - Disney continues to release box-office hits. Their direct-to-DVD sales are fueled by this steady stream of mass releases that keep the public aware of and interested in Disney.
3 - Disney markets to children. Children are not necessarily the most discerning audiences. If your kid fell in love with Lion King, they will also love any mediocre crapola served up to them, so long as it features the same brand name and characters. If they axe the famous voice actors (Robin Williams, Jeremy Irons, etc) and hire on a bunch of nobodies, are the 5 year olds going to care? Probably not. Their parents might notice, but hey, they bought the movie for the kid, right?
So there you have it.
1 - Futurama DVDs are not able to get by on 75 years of cultural importance.
2 - Without public releases to keep Futurama in the public's consciousness, its DVD sales would dry up.
3 - Futurama's not a children's show. It needs to maintain quality and appeal to adults, not to their slobbery little undiscerning offspring. People are by and large not going to buy crappy Futurama for the sole purpose of amusing their little bed-wetters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
asrttyoxo
Crustacean

|
|
 |
« #51 : 04-30-2013 02:06 »
|
|
Ridiculous that this has been cancelled. Ok I can understand those wanting the show to end while it's ontop and all, but the show is a thousand times more creative and interesting than many other shows, including the simpsons (from about series 12 onwards). Futurama is, and always was, the most interesting of all the animated shows (or maybe South Park.... but my point is, NOT Family Guy, even though I do love it for the laughs). Brickelberry? Bob's Fuckin' Burgers? The Cleveland Show (which isn't even officially cancelled for some reason)... Society have no taste in anything anymore.
I love Futurama but the last few seasons were extremely uncreative. They pulled way too much from current events to supplement plots (ie Susan Boil) that are supposed to take place in 1000 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
 
|
|
 |
« #57 : 04-30-2013 05:06 »
|
|
Dear Mr. Nuk,
While the direct-to-DVD marketing scheme has worked well for Disney, I must point out that there are differences between Disney's massive empire and the plucky Futurama team.
I was just pointing out that the direct-to-DVD model can be profitable compared to theatrical releases these days... it was more of a "there probably won't be a theatrical release" thing than "Futurama should do what Disney do". I really don't think that churning out direct-to-DVD movies like some kind of Disney sweatshop would be good for Futurama, or profitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inquisitor Hein
Liquid Emperor
 
|
|
 |
« #60 : 04-30-2013 16:29 »
« : 04-30-2013 18:18 »
|
|
TbH, I am rather neutral on that one. - Should new episodes be aired, and I enjoy them: Fine. - Should I NOT enjoy them, so what? Just stop watching it. Most probably there will still be some fans left drawing enjoyment out of the new episodes. A "cancellation before it becomes stale" would hardly do me any good: - I do not want to watch further episodes, so I think no one else is allowed? I do not really take myself that important as the absolute authority in taste (nor would I take anyone serious who does  ) . - I stop watching after 144 episodes, so the official production stop ALSO has to be after 144 episodes? No reason for that. Though -in all due fairness- it's still the preferable option to wait some "regeneration" years, for the show to return with some high quality episodes, instead of wishing for "as soon as possible, even it they are crappy" episodes.
|
|
|
|
|
DannyJC13

DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #61 : 04-30-2013 18:05 »
|
|
Good thing, it was becoming stupid!

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DannyJC13

DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #64 : 04-30-2013 19:21 »
|
|
I don't see how you think the show is only just becoming stupid. I mean, you're willing to accept cryogenics, flying/talking brains, shapeshifters, robots powered by alcohol, a microwave blasting a spaceship back in time, a planet inhabited by only robots, parallel universes, superpowers, a curse that turns a robot into a car, bouncing balls that can talk, a man at least 150 years old, a gazillion famous dead people still being kept alive as heads in jars, a spaceship engine that moves the universe around the ship and not vice versa, an evil Santa robot, a Robot Hell, a hat that makes a monkey talk and a bajillion other things that someone may consider "stupid" yet you think the show is just now getting stupid?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DannyJC13

DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #67 : 04-30-2013 19:54 »
« : 04-30-2013 19:57 »
|
|
Oh shit it's started!  Can someone upload the clip to YouTube for us non-American fans please? *edit* Huh, it says "2-D Blacktop" is one of the premiere episodes? So it's gonna be "2-D Blacktop" and "Fry and Leela's Big Fling", I guess? (7ACV15 then 7ACV17, okay...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheAnvil

Bending Unit
  
|
|
 |
« #73 : 04-30-2013 21:02 »
|
|
I don't see how you think the show is only just becoming stupid. I mean, you're willing to accept cryogenics, flying/talking brains, shapeshifters, robots powered by alcohol, a microwave blasting a spaceship back in time, a planet inhabited by only robots, parallel universes, superpowers, a curse that turns a robot into a car, bouncing balls that can talk, a man at least 150 years old, a gazillion famous dead people still being kept alive as heads in jars, a spaceship engine that moves the universe around the ship and not vice versa, an evil Santa robot, a Robot Hell, a hat that makes a monkey talk and a bajillion other things that someone may consider "stupid" yet you think the show is just now getting stupid?
Win. I don't care how Futurama comes back, if it's as movies, episodes on TV, straight to dvd seasons or on Netflix. It's too good a show to end now. Creatively these past few seasons have been as good, if not better than ever and some of the best episodes they've ever made have been made since the show was brought back. Even if you think it's gone downhill, it's still one of the best shows on television today (maybe the only better one would be South Park, but it's too close to call). And if you don't like it anymore, you don't have to watch it. BRING IT BACK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|