|
|
|
|
|
|
Jezzem
Urban Legend
|
|
I do have to say that I miss that Futurama used to be mostly 2D. The 3D scenes feel a little gimmicky to me when they're used so much, like the show has lost a little bit of its charm. It works well when used appropriately, though, like in The Sting.
I take issue with this. Futurama is mostly 2D. How is there any more 3D animation in the new season than there was in the original series (including Space Pilot 3000)?
|
|
|
|
|
lemily33
Starship Captain
|
|
I do have to say that I miss that Futurama used to be mostly 2D. The 3D scenes feel a little gimmicky to me when they're used so much, like the show has lost a little bit of its charm. It works well when used appropriately, though, like in The Sting.
I take issue with this.
Futurama is mostly 2D. How is there any more 3D animation in the new season than there was in the original series (including Space Pilot 3000)?
Sorry, I should have said "almost completely 2D." Someone mentioned that the crowd scenes now including 3D. Unless I'm mistaken (which I definitely could be), that's new. In general, also, the animation just seems more polished. It's prettier, sure, but I do think it's lost a little charm. I can't put my finger on what it is. In any case, I thought the new season was good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
futurefreak
salutatory committee member
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
How did you record on videotape? Do you have cable? I have basic TV and once the switch was made to Digital I lost all VCR recording capability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pewterbot9
Poppler
|
|
You would have to be some kind of romo not to have laughed at Prop Infinity. Romophobe alert!
|
|
|
|
|
|
futurefreak
salutatory committee member
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Really? That was one of my favorite of the whole season, right with the much underrated Lrrrenconcilable Differences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
futurefreak
salutatory committee member
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Hahah I misspelled the name, forgive me! It was late when I typed that.
A Clockwork Origin was awesome too. The only one that dragged for me upon first viewing was The Duh Vinci Code. I still find it funny, but definitely not among my favorites of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
futurefreak
salutatory committee member
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
|
|
I actually liked In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela but I think it would have fared better as a DVD "extra" since the episode itself seems more like a comic book story idea played out on TV. It does not agree with the rest of the series, much like most of Season 6 as Fnord pointed out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gorky
DOOP Secretary
|
|
|
« Reply #116 on: 03-03-2011 00:06 »
« Last Edit on: 03-03-2011 00:08 »
|
|
Re: Underrated episodes,
I find both A Clockwork Origin and The Duh Vinci Code to be very underrated.
For me, "A Clockwork Origin" isn't the most exciting episode; it interests me in the same way that "Crimes of the Hot" interests me: it deals with a somewhat hot-button issue while also exploring something about a main character (in the former, it's Bender's soft-spot for turtles (or something); in the latter, it's Farnsworth's scientific and theological convictions). That doesn't mean it's terribly funny or rewatchable, but it's certainly not garbage. "The Duh-Vinci Code", meanwhile, is among my favorites of the season. The Farnsworth/Fry relationship deserved to be examined, and I thought the writers did a decent job of it. Plus, it was refreshing to get away from that let's-include-the-whole-crew-in-every-episode thing that they seemed to be going for this season; in addition to Hermes and Bender in "Lethal Inspection", this was pretty much the only episode where the New Character Pairing felt organic. I could have done without Amy and Nibbler in "That Darn Katz!"--but Farnsworth and Fry? I could dig it. Oh, and I liked "In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela", too...but I've already said a lot about it in its episode thread. I'm too lazy to talk about how much I enjoyed it, damn it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
cyber_turnip
Urban Legend
|
|
Season 6 seems unfocused. Groening, Cohen, etc., had a whole plan for the first five seasons; when they were cancelled, one of them remarked something like: "There are characters we haven't even introduced yet." (Such as the Number 9 guy.)
Into the Wild Green Yonder was probably intended to be the end, period. But then all of us "spoiled" Futurama by insisting on it coming back, before they could develop some long-range ideas, and the result is Season 6.
They never had some great plan for all of the episodes, they had a few ideas that they wanted to set up and introduce later on. The Number 9 guy was just a remnant of an early scrapped plot that they turned into something else. They still have things they've planned since before the show went on the air to reveal too. Clockwork Origin, ironically, gets evolution wrong. It annoys me. But it's not a bad episode. How does it get evolution wrong? Don't say because Farnsworth says mankind evolved from apes because he says we evolved from ancient apes which is, as far as science can tell, true.
|
|
|
|
|
lemily33
Starship Captain
|
|
Season 6 seems unfocused. Groening, Cohen, etc., had a whole plan for the first five seasons; when they were cancelled, one of them remarked something like: "There are characters we haven't even introduced yet." (Such as the Number 9 guy.)
Into the Wild Green Yonder was probably intended to be the end, period. But then all of us "spoiled" Futurama by insisting on it coming back, before they could develop some long-range ideas, and the result is Season 6.
They never had some great plan for all of the episodes, they had a few ideas that they wanted to set up and introduce later on. The Number 9 guy was just a remnant of an early scrapped plot that they turned into something else. They still have things they've planned since before the show went on the air to reveal too.
Clockwork Origin, ironically, gets evolution wrong. It annoys me. But it's not a bad episode. How does it get evolution wrong? Don't say because Farnsworth says mankind evolved from apes because he says we evolved from ancient apes which is, as far as science can tell, true.
Oh, nothing that obvious! Just that there was no evolutionary pressure on the robots, but they evolved over a short period following the same path as humans. They shouldn't have evolved because evolution requires pressure, and also it doesn't follow any sort of predetermined path, but Farnsworth uses this as evidence of evolution. Some may like it. It's just a nerdism of mine.
|
|
|
|
|