|
|
i_c_weiner

DOOP Secretary

|
|
It would be either: - A Futurama-Simpsons crossover adventure
- A conventional spitting out right above PE
- A parody of Voyager
|
|
|
|
|
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary

|
|
The whole "anywhere in the universe" would be a lot more dramatic if we hadn't already seen them travel to the edge of the universe twice (I Dated a Robot and Route of all Evil).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frida Waterfall

Professor

|
|
Honestly, I expect the Planet Express ship to end up inside Fanny.
What I'd like to see them do is have an entire season based upon their voyage back to New New York, kind of like the epic "Odyssey". It would give the crew new reasons to explore new planets without having to do their delivery work. Also, much like Futurama Time-Traveling Bender Comic series, they could also have a side-story or two about what's going on back on Earth with Cubert and Dwight since they have no parental supervision, along with stories with Zapp Brannigan as a bounty hunter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frida Waterfall

Professor

|
|
They couldn't have them with Kif. Kif's with the crew.
I know that Cubert and Dwight may be annoying to most of us, but it is important that they do have their appearances. Children still need to be included in the Futurama world, as there still is an audience of children for Futurama. You couldn't have The Simpsons if it weren't for Bart and Lisa, and I believe that the same applies to Futurama with Cubert and Dwight.
|
|
|
|
|
i_c_weiner

DOOP Secretary

|
|
If they decide to do a Voyager/MST3k during the SciFi transition years/Odyssey plan, there is no way that I can see it happening past another full length movie. I just cannot see them spanning a multi-episode story arc at the beginning of the return season. Perhaps it could be a "made for TV movie" event which then launches into the new season, but I cannot see them either putting that much adventure into 22 minutes or into multiple episodes when they're trying to save the series still.
|
|
|
|
|
|
i_c_weiner

DOOP Secretary

|
|
But the one thing viewers hate is a series that they actually have to watch every single episode to understand, especially a series which never held that format. Television viewers, for the most part, are idiots who hate actually having to think. If you get six episodes in with nothing of the classic scheme happening, the show'll surely be canceled.
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Administrator
DOOP Secretary

|
|
Time travel. Obviously, send them to a point in time where everything is convenient, like say, the year 4000. In other words, LA.
They could, but I don't think are going to, ignore it. Though, I think Futurama writers are capable of wrapping it all up in a couple of minutes, if they have to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iceiwynd

Bending Unit
  
|
|
Yeah, I agree with speedracer - 1-4 episodes, 4 at the absolute most, and even that might be pushing it a little.
I love TV shows that make you have to watch the preceding episode to understand what's going on in the next one, but really, if a show wasn't like that from the start - and Futurama was never really like that - then going beyond 4 episodes is a bad idea that messes with the show. I do love your idea, Frida, but I don't think it ever would have been feasible for Futurama, and especially not now.
Things like that in shows like Futurama are best given to story arcs, and Futurama did a marvelous job at having those kind of float around in the background, like Leela's search for her parents, or the whole Fry's delta wave thing, where it would pop out more prominently for a few episodes but even if you hadn't seen The Day the Earth Stood Stupid or Roswell That Ends Well, you'd still be able to follow The Why of Fry easily enough. Unfortunately a "lost in space" arc wouldn't work, because that wouldn't be in the background, that would be the main focus of several episodes, and if it's all about them trying to get home/avoid prison time, then there would have to be a much stronger sense of continuity, pulling the arc even further out of the background, which just wouldn't work.
|
|
|
|
|
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary

|
|
I figure that if they renew the series they'll end up pulling a Deus Ex Machina style thing to absolve them of their "crimes". Sort of like the end of Brannigan Begin Again.
|
|
|
|
|
Gorky

Space Pope
   
|
|
I don't think the writers are just going to ret-con the ending of ItWGY--that'd be a pretty cheap shot. At the very least, I think the wormhole would take the crew right back to Planet Express--which is kind of cheap, but at least it's not a total reset.
If the show does come back in episodic format, I could see the new season starting off with some kind of Special, Hour-Long Premiere; it could wrap up all the wormhole stuff, and address the Fry/Leela stuff (and the fugitive stuff, and all the other crazy plot-points that were left unresolved), and set it up so that season six (or five, if that's how you look at it) can run smoothly and not-so-continuously, like the original run. Like others have said, Futurama was never one of those Last Week, On Such-and-Such shows; devoting an entire season to the crew's wormhole-related exploits would divide the fanbase and probably do the show more harm than good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Administrator
DOOP Secretary

|
|
Maybe just the one or two episodes, to make the serious fans happy, then back to crazy adventures.
They could do it for two episodes, but two specific plots in each, though related to their current position. Also, David Cohen: Every morning, and I'm not making this up, I find myself thinking in the shower about the next episode that we'll do after this one. I have it mostly worked out, so we're ready to go if the call comes in.
There is a chance of it coming back as the DVDs sold well.
Matt Groening: You have a solution? We painted ourselves into a corner at the end of this one, but I think we can do whatever we want. Cohen got us covered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mossy

Bending Unit
  
|
|
SPOILERS AHOY!!! (dont know how to do a spoiler thingy  ) so , having just watched ITWGY(twice:D), i started thinking. i know we all want futurama back, but it was left on such an ambiguous cliffhanger, i reckon it would be wrong to mess with it. for example; if anyone here watched angel, you will probably remember the finale of that: "ill take the 30000 on the left"..... it leaces you feeling like theres so much more that could happen.(hopefuly you see the point im trying to make) does anyone else see it the same way? i would love more futurama, but they seem to have hit the nail on the head with this one... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raiding Kvatch

Poppler

|
|
Ignoring the worm-hole and focusing on Fry/Leela relationship. I would like to see Fry and Leela in a Ross/Rachel relationship where everything seems to be great at first but it steadily goes downhill until there's a messy breakup and a lot of tension between the two for a while. Once all that's over with it could move to a point where they both still love each other but A. can't get over their pride and B. one or the other is in or has just come out of a relationship, i.e. it is never quite the right time for them to get back together.
|
|
|
|
|
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Did you just compare Futurama to Friends? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gorky

Space Pope
   
|
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: 03-24-2009 10:56 »
« Last Edit on: 03-24-2009 11:00 »
|
|
Hey, to me, that's no worse than comparing it to Family Guy...
Although I've got to disagree with your Fry/Leela-Ross/Rachel thing, Raiding Kvatch (while simultaneously welcoming you to PEEL). To me, what makes the Fry/Leela dynamic so great is that it's not full of (too much) drama. Actually, when you think about it (and I mean this in a good way), it's pretty one-note: Fry loves Leela, she can't get past her pride to admit she loves him too. That's why the ending of ItWGY was such a turning-point: to me, it shows that the writers are done with the whole unrequited love thing; if the show comes back, they're finally going to give us shippers what we've wanted for years. But turning it into a Ross/Rachel love-hate thing, where their own personal drama bogarts the show, would just be bad for business. Futurama has never been a romantic comedy (like I think Friends was); it's a sci-fi cartoon with dramatic and/or romantic elements. And, as big a shipper as I am, I'd hate for Fry and Leela's relationship to govern the direction the show takes (and I'd also hate seeing them break-up, get back together, break up again, etc.). I think the Fry/Leela ship would be most successful if it was kept in the background, where we as viewers clearly know they're dating, but it's not the topic of every episode.
Edit: Hey, I'm a Liquid Emperor, I am. (Granted, I knew this was coming, on account of I check my post-count obsessively. But still: party time.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Administrator
DOOP Secretary

|
|
... I would like to see Fry and Leela in a Ross/Rachel relationship where everything seems to be great at first but it steadily goes downhill... it could move to a point where they both still love each other but... it is never quite the right time for them to get back together.
If I wanted that, I'd simply watch my "F•r•i•e•n•d•s" DVD's - of which I have none!
And SpaceCase raises a good point, why do something that has been done to death by now? Besides, Futurama isn't your cheesy everyday sitcom. Do a parody of another show, if it is funny. And if it is sort up in the time. Friends ended years ago, it is too late to parody it, and too early to copy it.
|
|
|
|
|
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary

|
|
Also it sucked in 1994 and it sucks now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|