|
|
|
|
|
SpaceCase

Liquid Emperor
 
|
|
 |
« #5 : 07-04-2008 15:55 »
|
|
Originally posted by Kifz: I also noticed how easily and "magically" the rip in the universe got repaired near the end. They might as well drawn in the magic wand that did it. Real credible, yeah. Any more or less credible than a tenticle-alien the size of a planet? Or said alien reaching through the aforementioned rip in space-time? Or said alien wanting to carry-on a 'relationship' with every-single sentient organism in our universe?Or any one of a HUNDRED other science-fiction conventions parodied in Futurama? Originally posted by Kryten: Repeat to yourself "It's just a show, I should really just relax." What he said.  Nice new avy there, Kryten. New to me, at least...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
winna

Avatar Czar
DOOP Ubersecretary
 
|
|
 |
« #13 : 07-08-2008 17:27 »
|
|
The tear was caused by our universe in BBS... Our universe ripped at the seams because of the duplicate benders... However, Yivo exceeds the laws of our own universe. I believe this sufficient enough to explain how schklee could close the rift.
I think there's a small misunderstanding here though. I don't believe the rift or Yivo interacted with just Earth; I know they didn't explain this very much, but it's my belief that the rift appeared throughout the universe and that it contradicts our own concepts about how objects interact in space. To explain briefly, it was the same rift.... However, it appeared in multiple locations (thousands, billions, trillions?). Furthermore, Yivo interacted with primitive species from several worlds, and that other worlds created similar ideals about heaven.
These aren't magic, there's reason to believe all of it possible with a little abstract thought, things like our universe existing on something more than a simple 3-dimensional plane; and that Yivo has the ability to interact with our universe in a way we are unfamiliar with... Yivo isn't from our universe, a whole different set of physics apply to schklim.
The engine that moves the entire universe is totally plausible in my mind as well..... if it's difficult for you to imagine, think of the way it travels more like a wormhole. There's theories that we can shrink and stretch pieces of the universe. A vessel travelling through space from point A to point B could shrink the space in front of it toward point B, then once it passes this space, it stretches that same space back to its original size behind it. Futurama has also suggested that the speed of light is not the constant we once believed it was. The speed of light was changed in the 23rd century.... there's scientific evidence to suggest that this is itself also true... Increasing the speed of light increases the speed at which most objects can traverse the universe.
Lastly... since when does somebody make a comparison of relationships in Futurama with Frasier? Point taken though... it's a general rule of television. Fry discusses it in When Aliens Attack when he explains why McNeil can't get married.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frida Waterfall

Professor

|
|
 |
« #15 : 07-08-2008 18:06 »
|
|
I haven't been giving much thought to the physics of the other universe, but you did explain it well. I don't know if this will classify as off-topic, or just downright annoying, but I want to add my two cents on one of your paragraphs. Originally posted by winna: The engine that moves the entire universe is totally plausible in my mind as well..... if it's difficult for you to imagine, think of the way it travels more like a wormhole. There's theories that we can shrink and stretch pieces of the universe. A vessel travelling through space from point A to point B could shrink the space in front of it toward point B, then once it passes this space, it stretches that same space back to its original size behind it. Did you get that theory from "A Wrinkle in Time"? I swear I've heard that before, and I vaguely remember it being in that book. Originally posted by winna: Futurama has also suggested that the speed of light is not the constant we once believed it was. The speed of light was changed in the 23rd century.... there's scientific evidence to suggest that this is itself also true... Increasing the speed of light increases the speed at which most objects can traverse the universe.
Since you're bringing up the speed of light, I just wanted to ask you this one science question: "If a car is traveling at the speed of light, and puts its high beams on, how fast is the light of the high beams traveling?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
soylentOrange

Urban Legend
  
|
|
 |
« #19 : 07-09-2008 06:23 »
|
|
"If a car is traveling at the speed of light, and puts its high beams on, how fast is the light of the high beams traveling?" well, first of, a car can't travel at the speed of light. It would literally take an infinite amount of energy to get it to accelerate it to that speed. If it was instead moving at just a tiny bit less than the speed of light, that's different. if c is the speed of light, and the speed of the car is .9999999c, and it turns on its headlights, then the light that is emmited travels at the speed of light. Light must travel the same sped in all reference frames. The way that it does this is by altering the rate at which time passes. A clock mounted on the car's dashboard would run slower that a clock that was, say, sitting by the side of the road. Since speed is defined by the passage of time, somebody in the car measuring the relative speed of the car to the light being emmited from the headlights would be able to measure the same thing as someone standing by the side of the road.
|
|
|
|
|
ALequalsGREAT

Starship Captain
   
|
|
 |
« #20 : 07-09-2008 08:55 »
« : 07-13-2008 22:00 »
|
|
Originally posted by Frida Waterfall: Did you get that theory from "A Wrinkle in Time"? I swear I've heard that before, and I vaguely remember it being in that book. The first example that came to mind for me was Frank Herbert's Dune series, I haven't read Madeleine L'Engle so long I honestly don't remember the analogy used but I'll bet it is similar. I think Winna brings up a great point by mentioning the multi-dimensional theory; I know relatively little about physics (I was more of a Chem guy), but have always been fascinated by it. We have such a basic understanding of our universe and its dimensions (last I heard there it was proposed there were at least 12 dimensions?) and I would imagine that the laws of Shklee's electro-matter universe diverge from ours quite a bit. Additionally, as Soylent said, the energy used in anything close to light speed is so incredible that living beings would be atomized (not to mention what happens to time when forces like that are involved). I am completely on board with the "moving the universe"/"folding space" idea. Originally posted by futz: Within the last year or two they finally got around to measuring the speed at which gravitational pull travels. Guess what it is, yep 186,000 miles per second. THings that make you go hmmmm... I didn't know they did that! Was it actually measuring gravitons? I have to check this out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i_c_weiner

DOOP Secretary

|
|
 |
« #26 : 07-10-2008 08:51 »
|
|
I posted this in the "The Why of Fry" thread... My theory is that the time sphere causes a "bypass" from the points of time travel, both to and from. Thus, when the duplicate comes to the point of "from" (the present) the duplicate is doomed. Likewise, the "from" people have no recollection of the "bypass" events because they had gone through the "business route" (regular time). (Yes, I'm comparing time travel to a highway.) In this way, the 3007 selves would know nothing of the alternate past because they had lived through the "business route" rather than the "bypass" created by the time sphere.
For example, Lars would continue to live on the "bypass" and, upon meeting up with the "business route", would be doomed. To explain the tear in the universe, the massive new bypass created by Bender meeting all the other Benders caused a collapse where the bypass and business routes meet, tearing the fabric of space-time and, thus, the universe. Yivo was just there for the ride.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|