Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    Off Topic    Offtopic Discussion    The end of Spam and Threadclones « previous next »
Author Topic: The end of Spam and Threadclones  (Read 599 times)
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
**
« on: 05-17-2004 13:14 »

Already noticed? Our dear moderators have infinite much work with
* deleting useless threads,
* closing new threads about topics we have already in other threads or
* moving threads into other sections.

So if you are not sure if your new thread-idea
* is far too off-topic,
* is already in another thread,
* is about a "forbidden" topic (for example: "what are you eating now" / "PEEL-parodies" / erc.),
* should be in which of those several sections or
* what ever else ...
you may announce it here and ask for advice.

This way we can help to prevent another crash of the Off-Topic-Section.  :)

Random note: Please do not spam this! Otherwise someone will send a british prime-minister with a gun to your place ...  ;)  :laff:
Gocad

Space Pope
****
« Reply #1 on: 05-17-2004 13:23 »

TLL, IMHO most of these useless threads are created either by new members or those who simply don't care.  :hmpf:
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #2 on: 05-17-2004 13:28 »

That may be true dear Gocad, but still too much useless threads aren't good for the ... how do you call that? bandwith? ... anyway, "too much threads" lead to "crash" and I still remember the last big crash in 2002.
Probably most non-caring-people won't use this thread, but if at least a few people announce their ideas here before opening threads - this thread was usefull.
homerjaysimpson

Space Pope
****
« Reply #3 on: 05-17-2004 13:37 »

I think most {89%} of new members should be hanged my there feet.
DrThunder88

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #4 on: 05-17-2004 14:13 »

Gocad is right, but we also have to consider that some thread names are overly clever and do not instantly indicate the content of the thread.  How would an aspiring neophyte know that the gun-control thread is actually called "Phallic-shaped weapons" or that the drug-control thread is called "Keep the grass off"?

One also needs to take into consideration that many people may be used to unmoderated forums wherein a person who wants to post about a topic creates a new thread even if there are fifty previous threads.  PEEL is fairly unique in the sense that it is not only moderated but self-policed as well.  Examples of this are the frequent spamming of clearly doomed threads.  Very few crappy threads are only one post long.  Everyone and their Aunt Sally seems to think it's proper to post "This thread is doomed," or "Mods close this thread," or some such nonsense (do mods really need to be told when to close threads?)  Frankly, I find this behavior is worse than the opening of worthless threads.  I admit, I used to be a mod-wannabe like so many current space popes and above, but even on a dork message board it helps to have principles.

The third reason for so many closed threads is that they are either too specific or void for vagueness.  Why is one website worthy of its own thread while another is relegated to the "Link" thread?  Could a thread about flag-burning exist if there were a thread about freedom of speech?  And how many religious threads do we need?

At any rate, unless we quit accepting new PEELers or create a system where PEEL's general population has to petition the management for a new topic and only mods can create threads, this problem is not going away.
Margarita

Space Pope
****
« Reply #5 on: 05-17-2004 15:42 »

yeah right, like it will work. keep dreaming.
KVA

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #6 on: 05-17-2004 15:58 »

I want to ask a question: are obscene words like f*&k completely forbidden on PEEL? I have found a webpage with some very funny but indecent poetry but I don't know if I could post that link on PEEL.
Of course, I don't want to post these rhymes here, I'm only asking about posting a link. 
Margarita

Space Pope
****
« Reply #7 on: 05-17-2004 16:03 »

'fuck' is fine as long as you don't go overboard. for example, calling other PEELer a fucktard is not acceptable.
termos

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #8 on: 05-17-2004 16:10 »

I like that policy. My brother got banned from a telnet server once because he wrote a Danish word that just happens to be a certain offensive three-letter English word. They had a stupid policy.
KVA

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #9 on: 05-17-2004 16:15 »

I understand that going overboard and  flaming other PEEL'ers is an awful thing, but that was not not what my question was about.
The poetry I mentioned in my previous post has some words worse than "fuck" in it. So I wonder, will it be a mistake if i will post a link to that webpage?
aslate

Space Pope
****
« Reply #10 on: 05-17-2004 16:22 »

Fuck and other swearwords are fine, just used in moderation and appropriately, the poem form you mention sounds fine. I might add that to the PEELers' FAQ: Can i swear?
Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #11 on: 05-17-2004 16:24 »
« Last Edit on: 05-17-2004 16:24 »

I go by mArc's definition: if you feel a particular link need a warning (for minors/work, etc), it doesn't belong on PEEL. Basically use your own good judgement.

 
Quote
Originally posted by TheLesbianLeela:
That may be true dear Gocad, but still too much useless threads aren't good for the ... how do you call that? bandwith? ... anyway, "too much threads" lead to "crash" and I still remember the last big crash in 2002.

Actually what caused the previous PEEL crashes weren't thread-overload, it was post-overload. Too much spam, menaingless posts, back-and-forth chit-chat (test-threads were particular bad at this) caused the meltdown. If we really want to avoid another PEEL-crash we should either heed Doc's advice and restrain our spam-posting, or, more simple, ban test-threads once and for all.
KVA

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #12 on: 05-17-2004 16:43 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Teral:
I go by mArc's definition: if you feel a particular link need a warning (for minors/work, etc), it doesn't belong on PEEL. Basically use your own good judgement.

Ok, I got it. I won't post it on PEEL. If anyone want to know what I was talking about, he could say me and I will send him that link by e-mail. 

Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #13 on: 05-17-2004 16:52 »

I'm curious (and not a  minor, or at work right now  :p) so I'll be interested.
Nurdbot

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #14 on: 05-17-2004 16:53 »

Implied and mild nudity is okay, but that really as far as it can get. Stupid conservitive European server!
termos

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #15 on: 05-17-2004 16:55 »

Conservative? You want porn? Oh wait, you're the one posting all the mild nudity, right?
KVA

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #16 on: 05-17-2004 17:14 »
« Last Edit on: 05-17-2004 17:14 »

Sorry, Teral, but when I try to send a e-mail, I get something like "adress not exists or blocked" (that's the translation of message I get)
Edit: forget about that post, I understood the problem: I used copy and paste and got not needed "." in the end of e-mali adress.   :)
Nurdbot

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #17 on: 05-17-2004 17:15 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by termos:
Conservative? You want porn? Oh wait, you're the one posting all the mild nudity, right?

*Clap. Clap. Clap.*
PCC Fred

Space Pope
****
« Reply #18 on: 05-17-2004 18:29 »

Reality check time - no-one's going to use this thread or any other to ask permission to open a thread.  Most n00bs won't even realise this thread exists or what it's purpose is.  Spammers will open whatever threads they feel like and ignore any advice to the contrary.  And the PEELers who've been here long enough know to use the search feature by now, although I also agree with Dr. Thunder that thread titles should give a clearer indication of what the thread's about.

The PEEL crash of 2002 was maily due to excess spamming in Off-Topic.  Right now the main problem's in On-Topic.  n00bs cry for attention by opening a string of inane threads, and existing members (mainly other n00bs, but including several PEELers who really ought to know better by now) spamming the thread to death with cries of "This thread's doomed!"  Not to mention that damn Pharoah to Remember "Close this thread!" .gif that's turned up recently.

Personally I'd fix things so n00bs CAN'T start threads until they've been here a month or two.  Also I'd advise eliminating the ranking system.
Nasty Pasty

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #19 on: 05-17-2004 18:37 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by PCC Fred:


Personally I'd fix things so n00bs CAN'T start threads until they've been here a month or two.  Also I'd advise eliminating the ranking system.


I agree with you on your first point PCC Fred, but i cant say the same about the 2nd. I like the rank system, it's a nice little touch to the whole PEEL and it gives respect to some PEELers who have been here for long time (ie. You)

aslate

Space Pope
****
« Reply #20 on: 05-17-2004 18:38 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by PCC Fred:
Personally I'd fix things so n00bs CAN'T start threads until they've been here a month or two.  Also I'd advise eliminating the ranking system.

Says Mr. I'm a DOOP Secretay  ;)

In all seriousness, i agree with the noobs should not be able to start a new thread, but maybe for the first week or so. That'll stop the noobs that sign up, ask several daft questions we've already dealt with and then bugger off again.
termos

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #21 on: 05-17-2004 18:39 »

I agree that the ranking system should go, it encourages people to spam. But new users and old users should have the same posting privileges.
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #22 on: 05-17-2004 18:48 »

The ranking system is good. I've been here more than 2 years and I'm still a Starship Captain. You don't see me complaining (or spamming).
Anarchist

Professor
*
« Reply #23 on: 05-17-2004 18:54 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Nurdbot:
 *Fap. Fap. Fap.*
FIXED.

Oh, and ranking systems do indeed suck. Never in my life have I seen a ranking system (especially on an internet forum) that I didn't hate.

winna

Avatar Czar
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #24 on: 05-17-2004 19:16 »

The ranking system is fine.  Nobody takes it too seriously, so I think its fine.  People who spam just to raise that rank generally have problems from the mArxter.

I like the not being able to make new threads for a short while after joining idea, but I wonder how easy it would be for marc to implement.  I thought another idea might be that the register page has a list of rules attached before you join and maybe a mulitiple choice test where you have to make a certain score before you can join.  That may sound crazy for a second, but you might be able to eliminate a few questions that tend to pop up over and over if someone was forced to have looked at it at least once.  Also a link to some of the PEELers FAQs and guides would be a nice addition if it was in a relative noticeable location.  Just some ideas  :D
PCC Fred

Space Pope
****
« Reply #25 on: 05-17-2004 19:22 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Nasty Pasty:
 I agree with you on your first point PCC Fred, but i cant say the same about the 2nd. I like the rank system, it's a nice little touch to the whole PEEL and it gives respect to some PEELers who have been here for long time (ie. You)

Daniela's been a regular here 18 months longer than you, yet you both have the same rank.  Which pretty much blows a hole in your argument, Mr. 25 Posts Per Day.

If we have to have a rank system, then it should at least be based on more than just postcount.  For example you could say that to be a Delivery Boy you need 50 posts, and you have to have been here a month.
Dr. Morberg

Professor
*
« Reply #26 on: 05-17-2004 19:23 »

How about a quiz on the rules before people sign up? It'll force those who ignore the countless PEEL FAQ posts to actually read it. Many of the spammers aren't trolls, they're just n00bs who don't know the rules.
SixByNine
Starship Captain
****
« Reply #27 on: 05-17-2004 19:30 »

Er, am I the only one that remebers SuperFry and his 'thread idea' thread idea (er.. indeed confusing) and getting horible flashbacks. Not that there is anything remotely superfryish about daniella, but the idea was derided then and I don't really think we need this now, when we have the test thread. Also as pointed out most pointless threads are made by people who don't really know the 'rules' anyway.
NibblerJr

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #28 on: 05-17-2004 19:32 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Margarita:
for example, calling other PEELer a fucktard is not acceptable.

What? Really? I've done that several times...
aslate

Space Pope
****
« Reply #29 on: 05-17-2004 19:43 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by NibblerJr:
 What? Really? I've done that several times...

In an offensive, non-jokey kinda way, isn't accepetable.

IE:
N00b: YoUr a FuCkTaRd!!1  :finger:   :finger:   :finger:   :finger:
winna

Avatar Czar
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #30 on: 05-17-2004 19:52 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Morberg:
How about a quiz on the rules before people sign up? It'll force those who ignore the countless PEEL FAQ posts to actually read it. Many of the spammers aren't trolls, they're just n00bs who don't know the rules.

Did I not just say that?  :nono:
Dr. Morberg

Professor
*
« Reply #31 on: 05-17-2004 19:59 »

Yes. Yes you did.

I didn't notice your post. Sorry. :D
germanfryfan

The Listmaker
Urban Legend
***
« Reply #32 on: 05-17-2004 21:10 »
« Last Edit on: 05-17-2004 21:10 »

As a n00b I probably shouldn't reply here, but here is my opinion:

First to get really on topic:

Good idea TLL, but n00bs will never see this thread.
They aren't interesed in offtopic discussion when they sign up at Peel. They come to talk about Futurama in first place.

Here is a little story I made from my observation. I think there is some thruth in it. In my case the fact that I made avys and other pics (metioned later in this post) speeded up getting me to the offtopic.

a n00b's way to PEEL:

 
Quote


Somebody is really impressed by Futurama, maybe he/she already got the DVD's, VHS, Comics, etc. .
He/She searches the web for Futurama-Sites and finds CGEF in first place on Google.
Even more impressed of the huge database of knowledge, he/she finds the link to PEEL, clicks it and gets here.

First reaction: "Wow a Futurama community! Nerds like me who I can talk to!"

He/She looks around in the ON-topic boards (the Off-topic doesn't intereset him/her, it's not related to what he/she is looking for).
He/she takes a look at the big threads, mostly gaming threads, favorite quotes threads or reviews that are bumped to the first page of the list.

He/She signs up, but has no idea how to start a conversation. He/She opens a thread, either with a question of something that he/she obviously doesn't know, but has already been answered in threads long ago, or he/she opens a thread saying "Hello, I'm new! What's up!"
If nobody answers him/her in the following 5 mins, he/she will do a double posting to "emphasize" his/her intention.
Now the first Peeler answers him/her, giving him/her the Peeler's faq. Some Peelers answer in a harsh manner, some try to be friendly (like I claim to be).

Now you can observe three different types n00b's:

1. He/She's pissed, and leaves Peel imeadiadly, and if he/she returns this will be after a long time, when nobody remembers.
2. He/She's sorry, reads the faq, appologizes, becomes a good Peeler.
3. He/She's pissed, doesn't really care about the damn rules and posts the hell out of Peel. Later, after he/she is warned many times, he/she will be banned. (mostly male persons are of this type      :confused: )

In case of type 2.:
He/She will stay ontopic for at least 2 weeks, getting in touch with other Peelers, then he/she is going to be bored by only futurama-talk, and takes a look at the offtopic threads.


You see, n00bs won't see this thread if it is in the offtopic board. And if somebody is going to move it to the "General Disscussion" board it will also be forgotten, because no experienced Peeler will use it (They know what has been done before and what not, also they know how to use the search button) and n00bs open their threads anyway.

Topic - registration test:

The registration test is a good idea, in case of n00b type 1 and 2, as mentioned in my story, it'll prevent them of double postings and opening dumb threads.
In case of type 3: good luck. They will read the faq once and do the test (Cheating should be easy if can look up only the answers to the given qustions), and still post like they would without the test, I  think.

Topic - n00b posting previleges:

Might work, but would establish a "two class society" on Peel. I don't think this is a good idea, because it can lead to n00bs complaining in every thread that they can't discuss their ideas.

Topic - ranking model:

I think it should stay! It doesn't really cause any trouble, and spammers would also spam without them. I'm pretty sure they would!
Rankings combined of postnumber and regristration date could be hard to implement in UBB (I don't know), and maybe it'll be more confusing than the rankings we have now.

Topic - my close thread pictures:

I've said it in a doomed ontopic thread before, there all three of them were posted in a row:

I'm not using them anymore! They will stay online as long as the admins or mods don't tell me to take them down.
And I also told these Peelers not to use them in every doomed topic, just to add something spammy to these threads.
I think the whole thing is close to get out of control. If I take these off the net, some would still show up, because many Peelers have uploaded them to imageshack or aslates Filehost. Even more have them saved on their computer.
I'm also feeling guilty for nurdy's "Ze thread is our! End this topic" Berlin pic. I made it for him! Sorry!

My ideas:

  • n00bs should get the Peel-faq e-mailed. Not only the link, the whole faq in plain text! And their registration password in the same e-mail integrated in the text on the bottom, or in the middle. So that they are forced to read the main part of the faq, because they can't see it by fast scrolling.
  • The faqs should get extra links on the Peel main site, on top prefered.
wow, this was really long! If someone wants to he/she can count my spelling/grammar mistakes (I'm editing some out)
Edit2: I edited the layout a bit, should be easier to follow now
VelourFog

Space Pope
****
« Reply #33 on: 05-17-2004 21:20 »

New posters aren't always morons or jerks though. At least not back when I was new. I was awesome and still am and I'll ban anyone who says otherwise.

I think TLL is sweet to post those guidelines, but I agree with all the cynics that think it'll never help. And I'm tempted to start a running list of all the people who spam up doomed threads and post the tally, but the idea of being so nerdy makes me cry inside.
Gilby

Delivery Boy
**
« Reply #34 on: 05-17-2004 21:31 »

I feel awful because I made a useless thread FIRST thing when I joined and thus fufilled all the dumb newbie stereotype.
I was thinking maybe add the FAQ link in the registration page? Or put the FAQ as part of the registration page, you know the one you hit 'accept' on when you first click on the register link?

 
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #35 on: 05-17-2004 21:45 »
« Last Edit on: 05-17-2004 21:45 »

*applauds germanfryfan*
I'd almost forgoten how it happened!    ;)

The problem with emailing the FAQ to people is it's not a guaranteed they'll read it!
Give anyone something long and possibly boring (in their mind, no offense to 'slates great FAQ) they'll try and skip it and get on with it.

Like UELA's, how many people read them instead of clicking/checking "I accept these agreements" and licking "Next!"?

I re-propose the idea of "Sticky" threads that at the TOTP on page one, although I'm not sure if this particular board technology would support that?

Or maybe even something as drastic as what someone said earlier, limiting n00bs thread creation in the beginning, whenever they click "New topic", it redirects them to the search page first and then lets them post after checking if a thread already exists.
Then after so many posts/a month/whatever, they can work away and make thier own.
Nasty Pasty

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #36 on: 05-17-2004 22:49 »

Wow, after reading that "n00b's way to PEEL" i see so many patterns in so many n00bs here at PEEL. Who ever wrote that is dead on.

I dont think that i was bad when i first started, but thats just my point of view. I might have been as bad as some other n00bs...
Dr. Morberg

Professor
*
« Reply #37 on: 05-17-2004 23:16 »

To use this thread for its original intention, is there a climate thread or would it be too spamariffic? Not a "what's the weather like now" thread but telling what your area is usually like and things like that.
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #38 on: 05-17-2004 23:21 »

Couldn't that be discussed in the "where are you from" thread?  I mean, after all, climate and location are pretty well related.
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #39 on: 05-17-2004 23:21 »

At least this thread did open an interesting discussion.  :)

 
Quote
Originally posted by good Cymraeg friend PCC Fred:
Daniela's been a regular here 18 months longer than you, yet you both have the same rank. Which pretty much blows a hole in your argument, Mr. 25 Posts Per Day.
:)
Craig dear, you remember that nice list someone made once in a ranking-thread? It was like ...
Daniela - student - 1,200somethingish postings
Margarita - geek - 6,000somethingish postings
Tweek - lazy wastrel - 15,000ish etc ...
Anyway, you are right ... ranks do not give automatically respect to people who post here for a long time.
There is still a difference between 20 quality postings and 2,000 ... ehem ... quantity postings (also known as "I post like hell, whatever will happen"  ;))
Once ranks had a bit of charme and mythological respect the higher they were.
In todays' time we do welcome every week a new "legend" or "professor"  :rolleyes:

 
Quote
Originally posted by germanfryfan:
n00bs should get the Peel-faq e-mailed. Not only the link, the whole faq in plain text! And their registration password in the same e-mail integrated in the text on the bottom, or in the middle. So that they are forced to read the main part of the faq, because they can't see it by fast scrolling.
The faqs should get extra links on the Peel main site, on top prefered.

nice ideas  :)
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.3 seconds with 36 queries.