Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    General Futurama Forum Category    Websites/Reviews    my crappy site « previous next »
Author Topic: my crappy site  (Read 1042 times)
Pages: [1] Print
valis
Poppler
*
« on: 06-09-2003 20:06 »

I had to do a site for a web page authoring class for a mythical company so naturally I picked SLURM. The site will be at  http://student.brevard.cc.fl.us/harbaugh092/
until the end of the semester. Let me know what you think.

you may have to cut and paste above link.
aslate

Space Pope
****
« Reply #1 on: 06-09-2003 20:23 »

Personally, i hate frames. Sorry, but the rest of what i can see looks fine.
winna

Avatar Czar
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #2 on: 06-09-2003 22:47 »

That looks like a downright fine crappy site.  I believe you've done a good job, hope you get an A!   ;)
JavieR

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #3 on: 06-10-2003 00:01 »

Nice idea for the site. The page would look better if you don't use frames, but I guess you have to use them.....
dr_Dean_in _Oz

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #4 on: 06-10-2003 03:42 »

mmmmmmmm....craptacular
nah, im just kidding its all right
Just Chris

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #5 on: 06-10-2003 23:00 »

Frames are bad. Having 3 frames is really bad.
Pittzoid

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #6 on: 06-11-2003 01:32 »

definitely didnt like that multi frame scrollathon that i had to do but other than that. i hate having to scroll down and left for the right frame then side ways for the other one, it just gives me a headache.
alexvilagosh

Goose Patrol
Space Pope
****
« Reply #7 on: 06-11-2003 04:03 »

Yeh the three frames are annoying but otherwise its good.
duckarse

Delivery Boy
**
« Reply #8 on: 06-11-2003 08:49 »

its good for a site done in raw html....but one thing you will learn early on is lose the frames....they annoy eveyone. One for a main page and one for a nav bar is ok, but more than 2 is bad.

best bet is to try and get access to dreamweaver and edit the graphics with paint shop pro. if your school/college dont have it then its about 300 quid so you wont want to buy it.

anyhow....its good to learn html, then create pages in an editor (not frontpage thats bad) and edit the raw html after your basic page design is done....also you can learn more tags.

saying that all my webpages are really bad...but i might be starting a ZAP one soon.
Lee Roberts

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #9 on: 06-11-2003 15:26 »

Its not bad. Need to learn more about HTML like me.
davids

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #10 on: 07-02-2003 13:54 »
« Last Edit on: 07-03-2003 00:00 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by valis:
My crappy site
Its not that crappy
Jolly Mon

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #11 on: 07-02-2003 18:07 »

It is a pretty good site.
Rage Dump

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #12 on: 07-03-2003 02:26 »

Tedious.... nah the other one, interesting  :D
I agree with everyone else, its pretty good make the frames invisible or non-existant, very cool idea, and by the way welcome to PEEL
MrB

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #13 on: 07-28-2003 13:22 »

Original Idea for a site!  Too bad there's only so much information on Slurm in Futurama.
Bobby King

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #14 on: 07-30-2003 14:18 »

sorry, but i just dont like the frames  :(
Shadowstar

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #15 on: 07-30-2003 19:27 »

Frames r bad.
ooy

Professor
*
« Reply #16 on: 08-02-2003 18:43 »

i order slurm!! i never got it.me want my slurm  :mad:
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.175 seconds with 35 queries.