Beamer
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Well, in all 3 Terminator movies - when the robots/humans get sent back in time, they always come back naked. I think the Terminator theory is that matter can only be transported backwards through time, but only living matter, so static objects such as clothes can't be sent back... although I know nothing about time travel, I'm just drawing that conclusion since it happened in all 3 movies.
Since it was a Terminator parody, it's only natural for them to parody aspects of the movie such as that, so it wouldn't exactly be an accurate parody if Leela came back fully-clothed. I'm sure that if Bender wore clothes, he'd have arrived in the past naked, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Originally posted by John Pannozzi: But Bender didn't say anthing about Leela being a robot when he asked the WIM.
No, but Leela didn't mention wanting to kill the entire PE crew/having sex with Fry in AOI I either. Bender didn't say anything about wanting to kiss girls in AOI II. etc. etc. The What If-machine took a line and wove a story around it. Now you see why I say the comics aren't canon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nurdbot
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Beamer, you PWN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beamer
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Issue #11 just came out down here, and I finally managed to get a copy. Yeah, the nudity IS pretty unncecessary, but hey - I'm not complaining. Still, the examples on the first page didn't cover everything... there's still been some non-Leela "sexiness" in the comics, such as Amy's bikini carwash in #5, and the lingerie party in #11. However, the observations are definately right that the artists appear to be more biased towards Leela, but hey - I'm not complaining. Hmmm... I've gotta stop ending my paragraphs like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Zmithy
Professor
|
|
|
« Reply #51 on: 10-22-2004 17:35 »
« Last Edit on: 10-22-2004 17:35 »
|
|
I swear the UK marketing team are pimps by night. The top piece of the margin on issues 12 and 13: Everyone keeps demanding pictures, so I'll give in. Heres a competition - spot the topless girl in this pic! EDIT: Changed the images to thumbnails
|
|
|
|
|
|
ooy
Professor
|
|
Originally posted by Zmithy: I swear the UK marketing team are pimps by night. The top piece of the margin on issues 12 and 13 oh, thats what the "Leela on the cover" means.
|
|
|
|
|
leelaholic
Liquid Emperor
|
|
|
« Reply #54 on: 10-22-2004 23:04 »
« Last Edit on: 10-22-2004 23:04 »
|
|
Originally posted by ooy: oh, thats what the "Leela on the cover" means. No, this is what it means... ^^ Click to see the full cover. And, Zmithy, the topless girl is on the hover-thingy, with her back to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|