Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    Off Topic    It's got a TV!    Films Your Looking Foward to « previous next »
 Topic locked! 
Author Topic: Films Your Looking Foward to  (Read 20693 times)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 ... 19 Print
Prince

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #160 on: 06-12-2004 15:47 »
« Last Edit on: 06-12-2004 15:47 »

Goldeneye WAS the best of his films, they have all gone drastically downhill since then....It just seems too formatted. Its definately time for a change. But I fear they are milking 007 dry, they should quit while they're ahead, or they'll be remembered for all the wrong reasons........
 
Top of the Page wooooo!!!!   :D
Tramp

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #161 on: 06-12-2004 15:58 »

They should carry on making them, otherwise XXX will end up overshadowing it and no-one will remember the Bond films.  They sould do a few more with a new guy playing Bond, see how it goes and if it goes bad then think about stopping.

I wonder if they will follow up that idea of giving Halle Berry her little spin off thing.  The idea was to carry on story of Jinks (i think) in some more of her own films.
Sal

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #162 on: 06-12-2004 16:49 »

I dont know if this counts but im looking forward to Big Fish coming out on DVD. Best film ever. It is better than the best.
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #163 on: 06-12-2004 17:08 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Sal:
I dont know if this counts but im looking forward to Big Fish coming out on DVD. Best film ever. It is better than the best.

I seriously doubt that.

And by the way, Big Fish came out on DVD like a month ago.

Coilette

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #164 on: 06-13-2004 16:50 »

I've said that I'm looking forward to Spiderman 2, but I saw the trailer yesterday and it made my eyes water.
      The re-make of the Stepford Wives also looks good.
alenacat
Starship Captain
****
« Reply #165 on: 06-13-2004 17:09 »
« Last Edit on: 06-13-2004 17:09 »

I'm looking forward to these films being released in 2005, based on some of my favourite books
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0397535/  (Memoirs of a Geisha)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0385752/  (His Dark Materials: Golden Compass/Northern Lights
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0330373/  (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire)
Jamesbondcja

Professor
*
« Reply #166 on: 06-13-2004 18:28 »

This funny little image on View Askews Moviepoopshoot.com and newsaskew.com has made me want to see Green Hornet even more, not like I needed a better reason of course.



Plus I have seen the spidey 2 trailer about 20 times on TV today, god that cant come out quick enough.
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #167 on: 06-13-2004 18:40 »

I heard Kevin "I suck directing but I consider myself a good writer" would not direct Green Hornet. Too scary for him.
tom123

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #168 on: 06-13-2004 19:04 »

I am eager to see:
I, Robot
King Arthur
Spider-Man 2
Alien Vs. Predaor
and possibly some more, but I am not sure about it yet.
Speli

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #169 on: 06-13-2004 19:08 »

I, Robot is going to get raped. Asimov is spinning in his grave right now. Wait, is he even dead yet? Anyways, it's going to suck out loud.
EvilLunch

Professor
*
« Reply #170 on: 06-13-2004 19:09 »

They're making a movie version of Memoirs of a Geisha!? Churrah! :happy dance:
And they're FINALLY letting out the new Chucky movie! I can't be alone in loving that little doll, can I? And I ought to buy that poster..
Once you see it, you'll know why I predict it'll be yanked and the title changed soon.
"THINK OF THE CHILDREN!"
futuramaguy752

Delivery Boy
**
« Reply #171 on: 06-13-2004 19:11 »

Next Harry Potter movie might be good
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #172 on: 06-13-2004 19:36 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Speli:
I, Robot is going to get raped. Asimov is spinning in his grave right now. Wait, is he even dead yet? Anyways, it's going to suck out loud.
Whoever said nerds aren't optomistic...
I blame George Lucas, he seems to have inadvertantly destroyed every nerds fiesty spirit!  :laff:
Speli

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #173 on: 06-13-2004 19:45 »

Well I mean come on, the robots look like they were designed by the folks at iMac. I guess that's the referrence. iRobot.
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #174 on: 06-13-2004 20:08 »
« Last Edit on: 06-13-2004 20:08 »

"Well I mean come on" nuthin'!
I live in Ireland and have a 56k modem, so I won't see that trailer for a while...
So it there's any graphimacals out there, linkify!

I suppose I should read the book first?
*sigh* It's LOTR all over again!    :p
Speli

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #175 on: 06-13-2004 20:21 »

The book was soooooooo(+centillion O's) much better than the trailer.
EvilLunch

Professor
*
« Reply #176 on: 06-13-2004 21:14 »

I agree times one million.
The movie doesn't even look like it's based on any of the stories in the book, does it? Fie on that! Fie I say!
...
And the robots look dumb!
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #177 on: 06-13-2004 21:23 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Speli:
The book was soooooooo(+centillion O's) much better than the trailer.

Well, a book would have to be very bad to be worse that a 2 minute trailer, but I agree, this thing looks just bad. And Will Smith doesn't raise my hopes.

I've also read that the movie is inspired by an original screenplay (I don't remember the name). So, they just revised the script, introduced some concepts from the book and called it "I, Robot" to raise the movie's profile. But that may just bbe a rumour, I'm not sure.
EvilLunch

Professor
*
« Reply #178 on: 06-13-2004 21:53 »

I wouldn't be surprised. I've seen a few movies that have done the same.
David A

Space Pope
****
« Reply #179 on: 06-14-2004 00:38 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Speli:
I, Robot is going to get raped. Asimov is spinning in his grave right now. Wait, is he even dead yet?

Yes, he is; but if he wasn't, this would kill him.

First they put Mork from Ork in The Bicentennial Man, and now this.  I'll just stick with Asimov's books, thank you very much.
EvilLunch

Professor
*
« Reply #180 on: 06-14-2004 02:42 »

Bicentennial man wasn't horrible.. It wasn't faithful to the book by any means of course >/ But it was watchable, at least..
Although that female robot made me want to gouge my eyes out.
Ah, who'm I kidding..? It's Buy Jupiter for me..
Super CheekyBab

Crustacean
*
« Reply #181 on: 06-14-2004 08:15 »

I cant wait to see Troy    :D  and Spiderman 2!!   :p

And there are alot of SAD people who like Harry Potter on this Tread  :finger: it sickens me ur all nuts BOOOOOOOO get a hair cut!!
Jamesbondcja

Professor
*
« Reply #182 on: 06-14-2004 11:04 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Mr. Potter:
I heard Kevin "I suck directing but I consider myself a good writer" would not direct Green Hornet.

he said he didnt think he would be a good action director so might not do it but that isnt final, he says he will wait till the script is done first.

EvilLunch

Professor
*
« Reply #183 on: 06-14-2004 15:25 »

Cheeky, if you're gonna talk like that, please don't use David A's avatar.
Juliet

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #184 on: 06-14-2004 15:49 »

I want to see The Lady killers with Tom Hanks and MeanGirls. They both look good to watch. 
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #185 on: 06-14-2004 17:13 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Jamesbondcja:
 he said he didnt think he would be a good action director so might not do it but that isnt final, he says he will wait till the script is done first.

I agree with him, he's not an action director. I consider him a bad director, but he has written some good scripts, so in my opinion he's better in low-budget small personal comedies.
SlackJawedMoron

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #186 on: 06-15-2004 07:12 »
« Last Edit on: 06-15-2004 07:12 »

Hmmm... having a look at the trailer, 'Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow' will either be a fun bit of Crimson Skies-esque cheesy kistch... or total bunk. It has the style, certainly. Go thirties/forties!
Jamesbondcja

Professor
*
« Reply #187 on: 06-15-2004 10:53 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Mr. Potter:
 I agree with him, he's not an action director. I consider him a bad director,

I will have to disagree with you there as I think the brief action sequences in thinks like Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back, Malrats and Dogma were all done as well as in most big action films. As being a bad director currently I would have to disagree with you as you can see great progression from the long un-cut clerks shots to the stuff he is doing today.
Though saying he is a good script writer I would have to agree....obviously!  :p
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #188 on: 06-16-2004 00:38 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Jamesbondcja:
 I will have to disagree with you there as I think the brief action sequences in thinks like Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back

Yeah, that fart joke was mind blowing.

But I'll agree with Dogma, I actually liked that movie.
fryfanSpyOrama

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #189 on: 06-29-2004 01:53 »
« Last Edit on: 06-29-2004 01:53 »

I'm also looking forward into seeing the sequel to the Bourne Identity.  Yes, another spy film that's something we haven't seen in a while.

I also want to see Alien vs. Predator and Resident Evil 2.
alenacat
Starship Captain
****
« Reply #190 on: 06-29-2004 08:58 »

I'm looking forward to King Arthur. Keira Knightley certainly great in the role of Guinivere, check it out. I did some nosing around IMDB and found out she'll be appearing in an adaptation of Pride & Prejudice next year with Matthew MacFadyen as Darcy. I'm sure she'll be great but Matthew McFayden from Spooks? weird. They're on dangerous teritory though considering how good the bbc mini series was and how recent. To add to the list of good books being made into films, there's HHGTTG. Looks like 2005 will be a good film year for movies, but it's always tricky when the books are so in depth to make a film that works.
Nasty Pasty

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #191 on: 06-29-2004 09:29 »

Fahrenheit 9/11 baby.

awwww yeah. Can't wait to see it today!
SwanMan3000

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #192 on: 06-29-2004 10:46 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Juliet:
I want to see The Lady killers with Tom Hanks and MeanGirls. They both look good to watch. 


Dont bother seeing 'the ladykillers' it makes cabin fever look good.   :nono:
Coilette

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #193 on: 06-29-2004 12:04 »
« Last Edit on: 06-30-2004 00:00 »

I saw a trailer for The Terminal today and I wouldn't mind seeing it. I now don't have to worry about cost because I bought an UGC Unlimited card, so I can go as many times as I want.
eggsandwich

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #194 on: 06-30-2004 02:25 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by SwanMan3000:
 Dont bother seeing 'the ladykillers' it makes cabin fever look good.    :nono:


Cabin Fever, bad? I thought it was a nice attempt to bring back the late-70s splatter. Eli Roth does sound like an enthuastic director, with some good references in his 'Cabin Fever'. Needless to say, it was a good change from the current status of mainstream Horror in the 'states.

I was dissapointed at first, but I understand its very hard to impress the Horror community nowadays. He took it well, and he should be proud to say that he made a decent modern Horror film.
EvilLunch

Professor
*
« Reply #195 on: 06-30-2004 02:33 »
« Last Edit on: 06-30-2004 02:33 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by SlackJawedMoron:
Hmmm... having a look at the trailer, 'Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow' will either be a fun bit of Crimson Skies-esque cheesy kistch... or total bunk. It has the style, certainly. Go thirties/forties!

Live Actors + CGI Everything else = Unique.
Angelina Jolie + Eyepatch = SEXY.
So yeah, I'm gonna go see that bad mofo.
As for the Ladykillers.. I dunno.. I liked it. I never saw the original, and most originals are better.. But on its own, I found it very enjoyable. Lovely soundtrack, and Tom Hanks is very funny.
A lot of people are complaining about the product placement in The Terminal.. But I honestly didn't notice it.. Being that they were in an airport, and if there's one thing airports are, they're commercial. Actually, I thought it was somewhat more realistic seeing "McDonalds" and "Barnes and Noble" rather that, say.. "BurgerJoint" and "Bookstop". Ads rooted the film in the real world and made it very real to me, I think.
EDIT: http://www.theonionavclub.com/feature/index.php?issue=4025  Some more info on Mike Judge's "3001".
Otis P Jivefunk

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #196 on: 06-30-2004 13:21 »

I'm looking foward to seeing Shrek 2. I know most people have already seen it, but I haven't, and felt like saying I'm looking foward to it...
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #197 on: 06-30-2004 15:30 »

Shrek 2, HHGGTG, The Ladykillers (and that other Coen brothers film out that I haven't seen), Supersize It and Farenheit 9/11.
Sweetmelly

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #198 on: 07-14-2004 15:01 »

Nature and animal movies are unfortunately a genre which have rarely success in the cinemas. I hope it could be a change with Jean-Jacques Anauld's latest adventure movie "TWO BROTHERS" is a very thrilling film about two tiger cubs which where separated.
spacepilot3000

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #199 on: 07-14-2004 16:58 »

I'm very much looking foward to I,Robot.

I've never read the short stories, which for me is a good thing, so I don't have to nag about everything like what some internet people are doing. I can go into the movie with an open mind and high expectations.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 ... 19 Print 
 Topic locked! 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.228 seconds with 36 queries.