Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    It's got a TV!    New trailer(s)! « previous next »
 Topic locked! 
Author Topic: New trailer(s)!  (Read 9080 times)
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 19 Print
boingo2000

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #360 on: 09-04-2004 13:19 »
« Last Edit on: 09-04-2004 13:19 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by ~FazeShift~:
Brilliant trailer featuring that "In a world..." voiceover guy.
(QuickTime required).

  laff 2nd best trailer ever!  (The best being the trailer for Hitchcock's Psycho.)

EDIT: In a world where TOTPDs are king...
SlaytanicMaggot
Professor
*
« Reply #361 on: 09-04-2004 14:36 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Melllvar:
  We brits got to see this six months ago, and it comes to DVD 11 days before it opens in the States.    evil laugh

I defy anyone to hate this movie, honestly, the best movie I've seen this year.

EDIT: I've taken a look around the US sites for SOTD, I like the US Version of the trailer, contains some great bits (especially the "Team Pie" speech).

 http://www.focusfeatures.com/viewer.php?f=shaun_of_the_dead&c=trailer&ext=mov&w=480&h=202

Hi-res Quicktime version.


Please edit your sig to 120 pixel height max.
[This message has been edited by Administrator [-mArc-]
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #362 on: 09-04-2004 16:07 »
« Last Edit on: 09-04-2004 16:07 »

   
Quote
Originally posted by Coilette:
 That would be called Layer Cake with Micheal "Almost flipped a car over" Gambon.
Aha!
Thanks Coilers!    big grin
*checks IMDB*
Yay! Colm Meaney is in it!
Now it has to be good or it will break the laws of film physics!    tongue

Edit: Here's an extended trailer   (QT movie, 5.8 MBs)
Paste it into your browser and it should work.
homerjaysimpson

Space Pope
****
« Reply #363 on: 09-04-2004 17:08 »

This looks worst than the movie Open Water.
SlaytanicMaggot
Professor
*
« Reply #364 on: 09-07-2004 01:47 »

 http://www.thx1138movie.com/trailer3.html?play=3&size=lg  September 10th

Please edit your sig to 120 pixel height max.
[This message has been edited by Administrator [-mArc-]
Action Jacktion

Professor
*
« Reply #365 on: 12-02-2004 21:18 »
« Last Edit on: 12-02-2004 21:18 »

Doctor Who:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/news/drwho/2004/12/02/15823.shtml
Action Jacktion

Professor
*
« Reply #366 on: 12-09-2004 22:54 »
« Last Edit on: 12-09-2004 22:54 »

Well, that didn't get any replies. So how about Charlie and the Chocolate Factory?

http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=1313539&sdm=web&qtw=480&qth=300

(I don't remember Willy Wonka looking so androgynous in the book.)
Mr. Potter

Professor
*
« Reply #367 on: 12-10-2004 03:34 »
« Last Edit on: 12-10-2004 03:34 »

War of the Worldsī trailer!
Action Jacktion

Professor
*
« Reply #368 on: 12-10-2004 13:48 »
« Last Edit on: 12-10-2004 13:48 »

And here's the trailer for yet another remake coming out next year: Batman.

By the way, what's the meaning of the "They're already here" tagline for War of the Worlds? I hope it doesn't have aliens disguising themselves as humans yet again. (In case you don't know, the narration in the trailer is based on the beginning of the actual book by HG Wells. I wish they'd somehow used the version of that narration done by Orson Welles from the 1938 radio version.)
davids

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #369 on: 12-10-2004 13:54 »

Willy Wonka looks freaky but fantastic, could be the best Depp/Burton combo so far...
evan

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #370 on: 12-10-2004 14:08 »

I dunno, that "War of the Worlds" trailer isn't too intriguing for me.  The effects just look like "generic sci-fi movie."  And did we really need another version of that story, too?

Same thing with the Willy Wonka trailer.  It just didn't seem to need to be remade.
davids

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #371 on: 12-10-2004 15:04 »

 
Quote
Same thing with the Willy Wonka trailer.  It just didn't seem to need to be remade.

I really didn't like Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, I always thought he was too happy and sane, Depp's performance looks like it could be spot on.

newhook_1

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #372 on: 12-10-2004 19:00 »
« Last Edit on: 12-10-2004 19:00 »

Goddamnit! War of the Worlds does not take place in the 21st centuary. if that were the case, Earth's armies would have easily beaten the aliens. This is such bullshit.
winna

Avatar Czar
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #373 on: 12-10-2004 20:40 »

I was looking forward to the new Willy Wonka and the Charlie Factory movie... but after seeing the trailer, it looks just a little bit too happy.  I wanted an evil wonka with pedophilic midgets....  frown
Action Jacktion

Professor
*
« Reply #374 on: 12-10-2004 20:46 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by newhook_1:
Goddamnit! War of the Worlds does not take place in the 21st centuary. if that were the case, Earth's armies would have easily beaten the aliens. This is such bullshit.
I was wondering how they'd handle that. Slow-moving tripods don't have much of a chance against jets. The previous movie handled that problem by giving the aliens inpenetrable force fields. But in the book the humans were able to take down a few Martians even with relatively primitive weapons.
newhook_1

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #375 on: 12-10-2004 21:03 »
« Last Edit on: 12-10-2004 21:03 »

Yeah, really. I don't understand why they can't just set movies like this in the time period that the book took place in. The only reason to change it I can think of is because it's historically incorrect and didn't actually happen. Knowing this, whoever wrote the screenplay must have felt that this would detract from the realism, and therefore not scare the viewer.  But really though, who honestly cares if it's historically incorrect? A good writer/director(you heard me, Speilberg has lost his touch in recent years) would be able give the viewer a good scare regardless of the films realism.
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #376 on: 12-10-2004 21:41 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by newhook_1:
Goddamnit! War of the Worlds does not take place in the 21st centuary. if that were the case, Earth's armies would have easily beaten the aliens. This is such bullshit.

It didn't take place in 1938, either, and I don't hear you complaining about that.
newhook_1

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #377 on: 12-10-2004 21:45 »

Goddamnit! War of the Worlds does not take place in the 1930s. if that were the case, Earth's armies would have easily beaten the aliens. This is such bullshit.
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #378 on: 12-11-2004 10:56 »

Haha, showed you Nix.
Jamesbondcja

Professor
*
« Reply #379 on: 12-21-2004 16:50 »

Sin City

 http://movies.channel.aol.com/movie/main.adp?_pgtyp=pdct&tab=trailers&mid=19736

My god this movie can't come out fast enough.

I'm A firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class.

Especially since I rule.
Juliet

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #380 on: 12-21-2004 17:56 »

I want to see The Magic Roundabout the movie
 http://www.cinemovies.fr/cinetv/cinetv3.php?IDfilm=2348&IDBA=4614&typba=real&run=basse%20res.
RavenStar

Professor
*
« Reply #381 on: 12-21-2004 22:48 »
« Last Edit on: 12-21-2004 22:48 »

Apparently, Roald Dahl (however his name's spelled) absolutely HATED that first "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" movie - no matter that it was still a decent movie in its own right - and his estate only let Tim Burton have a crack at the remake because they loved the "James and the Giant Peach" movie that Burton produced. 

Nerd-o-rama

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #382 on: 12-22-2004 01:53 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by newhook_1:
Goddamnit! War of the Worlds does not take place in the 1930s. if that were the case, Earth's armies would have easily beaten the aliens. This is such bullshit.

I know you're being sarcastic, but assuming th major powers could avoid killing each other off at this point, the major world powers could give the invaders a much harder time than in the book or radio broadcast.  Which would you rather have: a gigantic tripod with a heat ray or howitzers, B-17's and a few hundred Panzers?  (Or King Tigers, but they didn't really have those in any numbers in 1938.  Or even 1945.)
davids

Starship Captain
****
« Reply #383 on: 12-23-2004 15:39 »

This could be the most creepy/disturbing trailer I've seen, something about it really freaks me out...

 http://www.whitenoisemovie.com/trailer.html
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #384 on: 12-25-2004 23:01 »

Aw man, now I'm afraid to watch it...

But it'll be on TV eventually.... I'm screwed!  eek
Jamesbondcja

Professor
*
« Reply #385 on: 01-21-2005 17:17 »

Wow, that Tim Burton, this flick looksas cool as I could have hoped for -

 http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/corpse_bride/

As does this, im gonna say fantastic however stupid that makes me look, except the tagline perhaps -

 http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/fantastic_four/

1 was bad? What the hell is that? Bad Doom, naughty boy, bad insane doctor....

Anyway see ya later folks, flame on!

I'm A firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class.

Especially since I rule.
Action Jacktion

Professor
*
« Reply #386 on: 01-21-2005 19:22 »
« Last Edit on: 01-21-2005 19:22 »

I'm not sure about Fantastic Four. The Thing just isn't big enough. And Jessica Alba doesn't look right with blonde hair. But I really don't agree with former Fantastic Four writer/artist John Byrne, who said he thinks that all Hispanic women with blonde hair look "like hookers." He does realize that some Hispanic women naturally have blonde hair, right?
evan

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #387 on: 01-21-2005 19:27 »

I thought Sue Richards did have blonde hair?  But you're right, Jessica Alba, while hot, looks waaaay too young to play Sue.  I also concur that the Thing is much too small.  Isn't he as big as the Hulk, depending on who draws him?  I know he does change size, but I always remember him as one and a half times a normal human.  No Human Torch version of Johnny Storm....uh.  And Dr. Doom looks like ass.  Not to mention the cringeworthy "one was bad" line. :shudder:

"The Corpse Bride" looks pretty good.  I enjoy the Nightmare... look to it.  It's subtly creepy, although I will state that the creepiness and relatively graphic corpse doesn't make this a "kid's movie."  While geeks, goths, and emo kids will see it, I don't see a huge traditional family film.
~FazeShift~

Moderator
DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #388 on: 01-21-2005 20:44 »

I saw the trailer for Hide and Seek, spooky.

"Charlieeeee?"

Pop quiz, hotshot: Has De Niro ever been in a horror film before?
Action Jacktion

Professor
*
« Reply #389 on: 01-21-2005 21:35 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by evan:
I thought Sue Richards did have blonde hair?  But you're right, Jessica Alba, while hot, looks waaaay too young to play Sue.
Sue does have blonde hair, but Alba naturally doesn't. And she looks too young, but the person who's really too young is the guy who plays Reed Richards, who's 31 years old. Yes, he's 31 but the hair on his temples is greying. Couldn't they have cast someone just a little older?
homerjaysimpson

Space Pope
****
« Reply #390 on: 01-21-2005 23:42 »

The Corpse Bride looks like it was done by computers. behhhhh!
evan

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #391 on: 01-21-2005 23:57 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Action Jacktion:
 And she looks too young, but the person who's really too young is the guy who plays Reed Richards, who's 31 years old. Yes, he's 31 but the hair on his temples is greying. Couldn't they have cast someone just a little older?

Well, IMO, Reed Richards always had that "painted on grey hair" look to his sideburns.  But I see your point..it looks like they de-aged the 4 by 10 years to appear "hip."
DogDoo8

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #392 on: 01-22-2005 01:44 »

Fantastic Four, it dose'nt look all that "Fantastic" to me.

Corpse Bride on the other hand looks OK, at least it looks alot more promising than "F4". It also looks like it has a very Nightmare Before Christmas feel to it.
RavenStar

Professor
*
« Reply #393 on: 01-22-2005 18:06 »

 http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/ong_bak-tlr.html/ 

This looks awesome.
Jamesbondcja

Professor
*
« Reply #394 on: 01-23-2005 09:46 »

My main complaint about the F4 trailer, except Ben Grimm being to small is Doom being in the same accident on the Space Ship, but the film itself has a more "ultimates" look about it explaining this and them being a bit younger than they should. Oh well...

Plus Ravens right, this looks really great.
El Oso

Crustacean
*
« Reply #395 on: 01-23-2005 11:59 »
« Last Edit on: 01-23-2005 11:59 »

Is there a Sin City trailer for WMP? The Apple screen is way too small  no no
RavenStar

Professor
*
« Reply #396 on: 01-23-2005 15:26 »

Huh...that's so weird...I watched the Sin City trailer yesterday in the computer lab at the Cascade Campus during the lunch break for my Multimedia 120 class, and it was large on a 17" mac monitor set to 1280x720 - but on my 17" PC monitor set to 1024x768, it's tiny.... damned macs!

Whatever the case, the production design team has already done an incredible job and I WANT to see that movie...
Capīn Skusting

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #397 on: 01-24-2005 11:18 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by ~FazeShift~:
 Has De Niro ever been in a horror film before?
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein with Kenneth Branagh.
Nixorbo

UberMod
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #398 on: 01-24-2005 12:01 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by ~FazeShift~:
Has De Niro ever been in a horror film before?

Just last year, in fact, assuming this imdb.com link works
homerjaysimpson

Space Pope
****
« Reply #399 on: 01-24-2005 17:57 »
« Last Edit on: 01-24-2005 17:57 »

doh
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 19 Print 
 Topic locked! 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.188 seconds with 18 queries.