Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    Human Resource Department    Who would you most like to date? « previous next »
Author Topic: Who would you most like to date?  (Read 8260 times)
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 [13] Print
Kryten

Space Pope
****
« Reply #480 on: 08-29-2007 21:15 »

Whoa.... calm down there. You say you've seen the real Leela? Okay, you just sit right there.

*calls those nice young men in white coats*
gaschief

Professor
*
« Reply #481 on: 08-30-2007 10:00 »
« Last Edit on: 08-30-2007 10:00 »

Iam the men in white coats hehe! I have just taken myself off to bed with a couple of nice pink pills!

I was talking about Katey Sagal the woman who does Leelas voice.
Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #482 on: 08-30-2007 10:48 »

Dear Diary,

Questioning own sexuality.

I think I may have one.

...

Naa!
SpaceCase

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #483 on: 08-30-2007 14:11 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Xanfor:
Dear Diary,

Questioning own sexuality.

I think I may have one.

...
Naa!
Uhm... Not meaning to provoke you, but ... Y'DO!
I seem to recall from somewhere that you claimed to be asexual.
"Asexuality" is a sexuality.
Did I just make a pun?

Ms. Sagal is one of those rare individuals who refuses to age as a normal person should. She's in her fifties, and still quite the attractive woman.
Hmm... I wonder... if we looked, would we find a decrepit portrait in her attic?
Yeah... Katey Sagal, Barbara Eden, and Raquel Welch...
  roll eyes
Ralph Snart

Agent Provocateur
Near Death Star Inhabitant
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #484 on: 08-30-2007 16:20 »

@ Spacecase:

Hollywood Plastic surgeons and Botox keep a lot of these actresses looking eternally young.

Granted Katie's face doesn't look like it's been touched.  Either she's got a good doc or she has great genetics.
Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #485 on: 08-30-2007 18:02 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by SpaceCase:

Uhm... Not meaning to provoke you, but ... Y'DO!
I seem to recall from somewhere that you claimed to be asexual.

I did. Show off.  tongue

 
Quote
"Asexuality" is a sexuality.

I wrote some of that article, I did.  cool

(Now to work on this...)

 
Quote
Did I just make a pun?

Uh... No comment. (  wink )

 
Quote
Yeah... Katey Sagal, Barbara Eden, and Raquel Welch...  roll eyes

Don't forget Elisabeth Sladen. Ok, she's changed, but not really in a disagreeable way, you understand...
gaschief

Professor
*
« Reply #486 on: 08-30-2007 18:26 »

Iam glad that image might have stired something Xanfor!
Iam a liitle perplexed though, you claim to be asexual yet have such unparalleled enthusiasm for the Fry Leela shipy theme.
Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #487 on: 08-30-2007 21:28 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by gaschief:

Iam glad that image might have stired something Xanfor!
Iam a liitle perplexed though, you claim to be asexual yet have such unparalleled enthusiasm for the Fry Leela shipy theme.

You've been studying psychology too long, Gordon.  wink

For one, being asexual simply means that I have no sexual attraction to persons of either gender. No desire to engage in the ‘makin' deh babiez pas de deux’.

(I think I owe it to idolizing Spock and the Doctor when I was a kid  smile .)

It has nothing to do with romance, love, or even physical intimacy. (All of which I do desire.) I think you may have been confusing asexuality with either aromanticism or antisexualism.

In a nutshell, I'd rather have chocolate. Or make out, perhaps.
But + will always =  love

And as far as I'm concerned, that  love can take any form it wants.

gaschief

Professor
*
« Reply #488 on: 08-31-2007 08:16 »

I have been 'Studying Psychology' since I could see hear and think...I still don't think i'm any further forward!  wink

I get your argument though, anyway my question wasnt that serious anyways  smile

My friend Gary always reckoned that people in the future when (if) we become more evolved will be asexual, as we will be focussed on other things...what I dont know !
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #489 on: 09-01-2007 19:14 »

That's funny because I've had people say just the opposite. This proves that one thing that will never change is people will never agree on anything. Unless they are taken over by brain slugs that is.
Kryten

Space Pope
****
« Reply #490 on: 09-02-2007 01:21 »

If evolving means giving up sex, I'm stayin' a monkey.
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #491 on: 09-03-2007 22:02 »

Huh, so we have to choose between life without sex and evloution. Tough call. Aw well evolution is overrated anyway. Suck on that Charles!

HipNoJoe
Bending Unit
***
« Reply #492 on: 09-05-2007 22:52 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Xanfor:
 Don't forget Elisabeth Sladen. Ok, she's changed, but not really in a disagreeable way, you understand...
I'm sure she, like Eden, Welch, et al. is great too, but Leela shows zero signs of aging at 30, so she still gets my vote for the most date-worthy.
 http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/403/01wu5.jpg   
She probably would be one to age gracefully as she is rather fitness conscious, but I have to admit, even if she did start to fall apart I'd still be drawn to her.
bend_her

Professor
*
« Reply #493 on: 09-06-2007 00:57 »

It could have something to do with her mutant genes. Then again, we did have a (non-canon) peek at an older Leela:


Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #494 on: 09-06-2007 01:10 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by gaschief:

My friend Gary always reckoned that people in the future when (if) we become more evolved will be asexual, as we will be focussed on other things...

Ain't gonna happen. Trust me.

One, because no species will ever evolve to this extent, by definition.

Two, because the human species has stopped evolving.

 
Quote
Originally posted by bend_her:

It could have something to do with her mutant genes. Then again, we did have a (non-canon) peek at an older Leela:

How old was that version of her supposed to be?
bend_her

Professor
*
« Reply #495 on: 09-06-2007 01:36 »
« Last Edit on: 09-06-2007 01:36 »

 
Quote
How old was that version of her supposed to be?
Just old enough to like knitting a tea cozy, apparently.

 
Quote
Two, because the human species has stopped evolving.
I know I'm asking for trouble, but why do you say this?
Sine Wave

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #496 on: 09-06-2007 09:12 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Xanfor:
Ain't gonna happen. Trust me.

One, because no species will ever evolve to this extent, by definition.

Two, because the human species has stopped evolving.

And here's where Transhumanism steps in.
gaschief

Professor
*
« Reply #497 on: 09-06-2007 13:02 »
« Last Edit on: 09-06-2007 13:02 »

That article was right up my flagpole sinewave, thanks. When i've had a chance to read and think about it more critically I may post about it!

I have often wondered myself if the next stage in human evolution may involve us reinventing ourselves..lets face it, in many subtler ways we have been doing that by re-engineering our living environments, educating ourselves, using medicine, etc, we have already allowed for versions of the human animal that would probably never have come about, if we were still foraging about in the woods.
bend_her

Professor
*
« Reply #498 on: 09-06-2007 15:32 »

Well if it's offtopic, Nixrobo will give me a sharp rap on my knuckles and delete my post, so here goes...

DNA and genes are just a means to an end: Evolution. Now that we have a replicator that operates on smaller time-scales (ie, our minds), we won't really need to rely as much on our genes to evolve. One way of looking at it is that what makes us human is our minds, and that we are really just the thought patterns that inhabit our minds. Dawkins called them memes. This may explain why we are often so ashamed of the things our carrier bodies need to do to survive, like sex.
HipNoJoe
Bending Unit
***
« Reply #499 on: 09-06-2007 22:08 »

Hmm... how to stay on the dating topic yet address the evolution sub-thread...
I'd probably date old Leela (that picture is from a comic, isn't it?) She looks pretty hot for what, 70? I'm sure the primitive, genetically programmed reptilian region of my brain is energized by her curvy form to the point that it overcomes its own distaste for the signs of advanced age in her face. You give her a good face-lift and my sex drive couldn't tell the difference between her and a young woman of child-bearing age. That's what most of the beauty industry is about, isn't it, making older women look young and sexy?
gaschief

Professor
*
« Reply #500 on: 09-07-2007 23:33 »
« Last Edit on: 09-07-2007 23:33 »

or making ugly young women look sexy!   wink still leela doesnt need that, she'd wake up next to you all tired and shaby and still look very hot   flirt
Decapodian

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #501 on: 09-08-2007 05:17 »

Humans are still evolving. Anyone who thinks humans are as evolved as is possible needs a knock to the head to reassert their thinking processes.
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #502 on: 09-08-2007 19:15 »

It isn't that they are evolved as possible as much as we have advanced to a point where natural selection has less of an influence on our life/death. People that would die out and thus be removed from the gene pool in the wild, can thrive in the modern world and vice versa.
Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #503 on: 09-08-2007 20:46 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Decapodian:

Humans are still evolving. Anyone who thinks humans are as evolved as is possible needs a knock to the head to reassert their thinking processes.

Humans are not still evolving. Humans are not as evolved as possible, however, they have stopped evolving. In the traditional sense, that is. Like Frisco said.

(BTW, intelligent discussion must take place at it's proper location. On-topic has thus been saved!)

Decapodian

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #504 on: 09-08-2007 23:48 »

How did we even start talking about evolution on the fictional date thread?
Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #505 on: 09-09-2007 00:23 »

Well, you see, first I implied Katey Sagal was sexually attractive. Since this is something I rarely do, I drew some emphasis to this fact. SpaceCase then replied by pointing out an error in the wording of my post, which gaschief then read and remarked with slight confusion. I then set him straight, after which he told me that a friend of his thinks one day, everyone will be like me. I replied by saying how it ain't ever gonna happen, in a post that included a statement about how the human species is no longer evolving. And apparently, people ran with it.

I love topics which do that. Brings out the intelligent debate in people.

Now I want a hug. Come on, group hug everybody! Don't be shy! Group hug!

El_Luxo

Delivery Boy
**
« Reply #506 on: 09-09-2007 06:38 »

Katey Sagal, didnt she use to be Peggy Bundy in Married with children? That kinda takes the hot out of every picture with her and also makes Leela a bit nasty in some way more than that she just has one eye. So i would maybe go with amy, i have this thing for asian looking girls anyway.

 Also Lucy Lius head would work. The robot hologram would be to strange, and i would not like to be on benders bad side.
Human dating robot?! Baaaad. 
SpaceCase

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #507 on: 09-09-2007 11:35 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Xanfor:
Well, you see, first I implied Katey Sagal was sexually attractive. Since this is something I rarely do, I drew some emphasis to this fact. SpaceCase then replied by pointing out an error in the wording of my post, which gaschief then read and remarked with slight confusion. I then set him straight, after which he told me that a friend of his thinks one day, everyone will be like me. I replied by saying how it ain't ever gonna happen, in a post that included a statement about how the human species is no longer evolving...
Xanfor, you're making my head hurt...  eek
Nothing a fistfull of Vicodin wouldn't fix...
Ralph Snart

Agent Provocateur
Near Death Star Inhabitant
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #508 on: 09-09-2007 11:58 »

Spacey, go for Percocet 7.5/500.  A few of those and the freaking world can explode in a pus-filled death and you wouldn't care.

As for Katey as Peg Bundy - I always loved the ravishingly beautiful Peg - I guess it was the big red hair.

As for Xanfor and his asexual-ness, me being a crock-pot of bubbling male hormones, I'll be glad to give you a transfusion of said hormones.  Then you would see Peg/Katey as very desirable women.  (OK, Peg looks good, but my body would explode being married to such a lazy woman)
gaschief

Professor
*
« Reply #509 on: 09-09-2007 12:48 »
« Last Edit on: 09-11-2007 00:00 »

ARRROOOOOOOO
HipNoJoe
Bending Unit
***
« Reply #510 on: 09-09-2007 22:48 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Ralph Snart:
I always loved the ravishingly beautiful Peg - I guess it was the big red hair.
I recall Sam Kinison talking about a guest appearance on Married and going on and on about how much hotter he thought Katey Sagal was than Christina Applegate in person. I'm not sure I would go that far, but she was rather hot for a large-ish gal and still is actually.
Ralph Snart

Agent Provocateur
Near Death Star Inhabitant
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #511 on: 09-10-2007 03:25 »

When you save 'a large-ish' gal, I assume you mean tall, because I can honestly tell you that Katey is not fat and in great phyical shape.

Personally I have this motto:

Some like the big, some like them small,
It takes a real man to like them all.
coldangel

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #512 on: 09-10-2007 03:47 »

Yeah, I'm presently shagging a gal who's about a head taller than me. I got over my personal inadequacy about half a second after she removed her clothes the first time.
Xanfor

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #513 on: 09-10-2007 19:23 »
« Last Edit on: 03-13-2008 00:00 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by coldangel_1:

Yeah, I'm presently shagging a gal who's about a head taller than me. I got over my personal inadequacy about half a second after she removed her clothes the first time.

Tell you what... If you find any girls taller than Brad Garret, I'll take advantage of Ralph's generous offer.
Frisco17

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #514 on: 09-10-2007 21:26 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Xanfor:
 Tell you what... If you find any girls taller than Brad Garret, I'll take advantage of Ralph's generous offer.

I'm not sure if that's possible.
HipNoJoe
Bending Unit
***
« Reply #515 on: 09-14-2007 03:01 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Ralph Snart:
When you say 'a large-ish' gal, I assume you mean tall, because I can honestly tell you that Katey is not fat and in great phyical shape...
Yes, more like a linebacker than a sumo wrestler, a very sexy linebacker.
Tinyjoshua

Crustacean
*
« Reply #516 on: 09-24-2007 23:24 »

leela
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 [13] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.138 seconds with 17 queries.