Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    Re-Check/Weird Scenes    This way to the Galaxy of Terror « previous next »
Author Topic: This way to the Galaxy of Terror  (Read 1329 times)
Pages: [1] Print
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
**
« on: 03-14-2003 14:05 »

In several episoed you can see in the background much star constellations, nebulas, stars, galaxys, etc ...
I thought long time which galaxys and stars that could be. I mean which stellar objects in the known astronomic catalogues (Messier, NGC, etc ...)
So, that's about what this thread is.
Also about everything astronomical that has to do with Futurama episode. (like: talking about far away planets and so on ...)
Margarita

Space Pope
****
« Reply #1 on: 03-14-2003 17:13 »

I like that ep about Liquid Emperors and Galaxy of Terror - "My Three Suns"
Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #2 on: 03-14-2003 17:29 »
« Last Edit on: 03-14-2003 17:29 »

The most wellknown object is probably the Horsehead Nebula (Barnard 33) in "Love & Rocket":




Don't confuse not caring with not knowing!
Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #3 on: 03-14-2003 18:04 »

And the Coalsack Nebula seen in "Hell Is Other Robots":

TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #4 on: 03-14-2003 18:17 »

The Galaxy of Terror is looking mostly like M51, ...

... but M51 has a little twin galaxy and the GoT not.

M33 is maybe another good idea ...

Lee Roberts

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #5 on: 03-14-2003 18:27 »

They look excellent don't they!
Margarita

Space Pope
****
« Reply #6 on: 03-14-2003 18:32 »

episode "godfellas" is about space...

Lee Roberts

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #7 on: 03-14-2003 18:41 »

That one does too...
Scythemantis

Crustacean
*
« Reply #8 on: 03-14-2003 23:39 »

Off topic, but there's actually a movie called "galaxy of terror". It's a 70's cult horror movie in which the cast is killed off by their own personal living nightmares the evil planet they've landed on manufactures for them. Like most successful b-movies, it's incredibly trashy and low-brow. Infamous for a scene in which a female character is "assaulted" (*cough*) by a giant maggotlike alien. I doubt the episode was paying any sort of homage to it, but you never know. It's extremely popular in the "bad movies are good movies" crowd (I've never seen it, though.)
FrysGIRL

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #9 on: 03-15-2003 12:27 »

When you guys post a pic of the real nebula(s), can you place the pic(s) from the episode next to it like Teral did?
aslate

Space Pope
****
« Reply #10 on: 03-15-2003 13:43 »

M5438 is a nebula isn't it?
Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #11 on: 03-15-2003 18:36 »

Probably not. The Messier catalogue doesn't go higher than M110.
totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #12 on: 03-15-2003 20:05 »

Woo. Some people have spent way more time than is healthy staring into telescopes.

Of course, if I had a telescope I would do the same.
Smitty

Professor
*
« Reply #13 on: 03-15-2003 21:02 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Teral:
Probably not. The Messier catalogue doesn't go higher than M110.

Who's to say it won't increase by 5000 over the next thousand years?
Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #14 on: 03-15-2003 22:26 »

Well, for one Messier died almost 200 years ago. Besides, today newer catalogues, like the NGC, ia used when adding new objects.

I read aslate's question as if he sugested M5438 might be named after a Messier object.
Smitty

Professor
*
« Reply #15 on: 03-17-2003 13:33 »

Well increasing it was just an idea I had, like increasing the speed of light. I didn't know he was dead. I suppose I should have known since most scientists are dead.
TheLesbianLeela

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #16 on: 03-17-2003 14:53 »

All about Messier and his catalogue, here:  http://www.seds.org/messier/Messier.html   smile
I'm not sure but I've heared that the newest dicovered galaxies aren't in the Messier- either in the NGC-catalogue.
There are new catalogues in use.
(bytheway: NGC = Nebula and Galaxy Catalogue)
Pittzoid

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #17 on: 03-18-2003 04:41 »

i like how the writers of futurama often use real astronomical planets and constellations. espescially how omicron persei is real and stuff
Gocad

Space Pope
****
« Reply #18 on: 03-18-2003 06:04 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Pittzoid:
i like how the writers of futurama often use real astronomical planets and constellations. espescially how omicron persei is real and stuff

Keep in mind, the writers of the show do suffer from overeducation...and can't hide this.  laff


I'm watching you. Yes, YOU!
Teral

Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #19 on: 03-18-2003 11:55 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by TheLesbianLeela:
All about Messier and his catalogue, here:  http://www.seds.org/messier/Messier.html    smile
I'm not sure but I've heared that the newest dicovered galaxies aren't in the Messier-
The Messier consists only of those objects Messier himself put into it.

 
Quote
(bytheway: NGC = Nebula and Galaxy Catalogue)

Actually it stands for "New General Catalogue", published in 1888.

Don't confuse not caring with not knowing!
Smitty

Professor
*
« Reply #20 on: 03-18-2003 12:06 »

 
Quote
Originally posted by Teral:
The Messier consists only of those objects Messier himself put into it.

So if he was resurrected could he add a few more?
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.129 seconds with 17 queries.