Futurama   Planet Express Employee Lounge
The Futurama Message Board

Design and Support by Can't get enough Futurama
Help Search Futurama chat Login Register

PEEL - The Futurama Message Board    PEEL Vault    Poster of the Month    POTM May 2015 Nomination Thread « previous next »
 Topic locked! 
Author Topic: POTM May 2015 Nomination Thread  (Read 854 times)
Pages: [1] Print
DannyJC13

DOOP Secretary
*
« on: 06-01-2015 16:29 »
« Last Edit on: 06-01-2015 16:32 »

We're almost halfway through the year, already! eek

Ineligible PEELers:

totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #1 on: 06-01-2015 17:27 »

I haven't been paying much attention recently. I've been busy. Which means I've only skimmed the most recently updated threads.

Still, based on this I'm nominating SpacemanSpiff, for being correct about things. AllEggsIn1Basket for goat pictures that don't simply make me want to roast a goat, and Monster Robot Maniac for bringing this to my attention.

Honourable mention to Danny, for sharing the information four hours later in the Rick & Morty thread. He tried, bless his little cotton socks.
tyraniak

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #2 on: 06-02-2015 00:42 »

Beamer
Tastes Like Fry

That's it
TheMadCapper

Fluffy
UberMod
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #3 on: 06-02-2015 22:50 »
« Last Edit on: 06-03-2015 10:06 »

TLF has been doing a fine job. I'm going to nominate her.
JoshTheater

Space Pope
****
« Reply #4 on: 06-03-2015 00:32 »

Tastes Like Fry
UnrealLegend
Jezzem
Tachyon

Moderator
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #5 on: 06-03-2015 08:08 »
« Last Edit on: 06-05-2015 16:57 »


  • Tastes Like Fry
  • AllEggsIn1Basket
  • Spacedal11



tyraniak

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #6 on: 06-03-2015 15:43 »
« Last Edit on: 06-03-2015 15:44 »

With just one member with three nominations and only one other with more than one, maybe we should just appoint the highest nominee instead of taking it to a vote
totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #7 on: 06-03-2015 21:08 »

With just one member with three nominations and only one other with more than one, maybe we should just appoint the highest nominee instead of taking it to a vote

All in favour of taking this idea to a vote? tongue

Yeah, I'd be cool with this. There's a clear winner emerging. Except that so far, this thread hasn't really been open long enough for anybody to call the results. Have patience, grasshopper. Allow the allotted five days to run their course.
Quantum Neutrino Field

Liquid Emperor
**
« Reply #8 on: 06-04-2015 23:42 »

Only problem is that there is less people nominating than voting.

Tastes Like Fry
AllEggsIn1Basket
UnrealLegend
tyraniak

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #9 on: 06-05-2015 00:04 »

I suppose I'll give my third nom to UnrealLegend, that way we'll have at least three viable contenders
UnrealLegend

Space Pope
****
« Reply #10 on: 06-05-2015 00:39 »

Only problem is that there is less people nominating than voting.

I'm probably contributing to that problem. I'm slightly mildly lazy.
Nibblonian Leader

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #11 on: 06-05-2015 10:03 »

Nibbs is ALWAYS a viable contender, like Michael Dukakis, or Ron Paul!
totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #12 on: 06-05-2015 14:27 »

I'm probably contributing to that problem.

You and the other 11,000+ users who don't post anymore.
Gorky

Space Pope
****
« Reply #13 on: 06-05-2015 15:20 »

To be fair, it's probably a good thing that roughly 10,900 of those people are no longer here; I never liked those guys much, anyway (they know who they are shifty).

On a somewhat related note, I definitely wasn't around here enough in May to nominate anyone for this month's POTM. But I definitely think a poll is worth doing regardless of how many people would actually qualify to be on it, because - as QNF notes - more people tend to vote than to nominate. And, really, if only four or five folks did anything POTM-worthy this month, and if those people have already been nominated, a bunch of others coming in here and re-nomming them is pretty pointless.

I guess what I'm saying is that I see no real problem with the nomination process being done by committee - a few dedicated PEELers coming in and nominating the same people everyone else was probably already thinking of nominating - as long as we do eventually take those results to an individual vote.
Tachyon

Moderator
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #14 on: 06-05-2015 16:46 »


Well, we may have been coughing up blood last night, but we're not dead, yet!

Also, honourable mention to Freak-o for this great post:


DannyJC13

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #15 on: 06-09-2015 18:25 »

I guess that's it for nominations...?
Beamer

DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #16 on: 06-09-2015 18:39 »

Annnd the winner of Mr. and Ms. PEELified is...!
Cudry

Bending Unit
***
« Reply #17 on: 06-09-2015 19:11 »
« Last Edit on: 06-09-2015 19:13 »

Gorky
Nibblonian Leader
Spacedal11
Nibblonian Leader

Urban Legend
***
« Reply #18 on: 06-09-2015 22:50 »

See, Cudry gets it.

AllEggsIn1Basket
Totalnerduk
Gorky
totalnerd undercanada

DOOP Ubersecretary
**
« Reply #19 on: 06-09-2015 23:39 »

Totalnerduk

Now there's a waste of a nomination if ever I've seen one. I'm never going to win a POTM again, Nibbly. I've had my day. My star is fading. Also, I barely post these days.

Which is probably a good thing, to be honest.
futurefreak

salutatory committee member
Moderator
DOOP Secretary
*
« Reply #20 on: 06-12-2015 11:48 »

I want to put Gorky on the poll, but she didn't actually post in the month of May so unfortunately are sagely comrade is ineligible hmpf

I'll nominate:

AllEggsin1Basket
TastesLikeFry

And for his memorable two posts in May, Nibblonian Leader. Way to just make the cut man!
Pages: [1] Print 
 Topic locked! 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines | some icons from famfamfam
Legal Notice & Disclaimer: "Futurama" TM and copyright FOX, its related entities and the Curiosity Company. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, duplication or distribution of these materials in any form is expressly prohibited. As a fan site, this Futurama forum, its operators, and any content on the site relating to "Futurama" are not explicitely authorized by Fox or the Curiosity Company.
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 19 queries.