Poster Of The Month: "Official" Rule Discussion

[Reply #200 on:]

 I agree with Bend-err.

I also agree with this.

[Reply #201 on:]

I agree with Bend-err.

I also agree with this.

I agree with one of you, but not the other two.

[Reply #202 on:]

So many people agreeing with me lately. I think this can only mean that PEEL will be gone forever soon

[Reply #203 on:]

If you went back to 2006 and informed people that in five years I'd have the word "Moderator" written under my avatar, they'd probably tell you the same thing.

[Reply #204 on:]

If I told you everything was going to plan five years from now

[Reply #205 on:]

Results are in:


* Who is eligible for nomination:
-everyone who didn't win within 12 months

* How many nominations should everyone be able to make:
-3 (no multiples)

* How long does nominating last:
-5 days

* How long does voting last:
-5 days

* Default number of POTM candidates
- 10

* Should the POTM poll allow PEELers to vote only for their foremost choice or for all choices they support?
-foremost choice only (1 vote)

I'm liking these results, good choices and I think these will work well. Mostly what I went for too...

Also congrats Xanfor!...

[Reply #206 on:]

So currently not able to win for April 2011:

Gorky                         April 2010
Futurama_Freak1         May 2010
km73                         June 2010
Svip                           July 2010
Bend-err                     August 2010
Nutmeg1729               September 2010
Morgan_G19               October 2010
ShepherdofShark         November 2010
Nutmeg1729               December 2010
futurefreak                 January 2010
Xanfor                        February 2010
Hobbitboy                   March 2010

2010 is the longest year ever.

[Reply #207 on:]

It was 365 whole days.

[Reply #208 on:]

Well at least there's only 11 people on that list. Means you've got one extra person to choose from when you're nominating now.

[Reply #209 on:]

So currently not able to win for April 2011:

Gorky                         April 2010
Futurama_Freak1         May 2010
km73                         June 2010
Svip                           July 2010
Bend-err                     August 2010
Nutmeg1729               September 2010
Morgan_G19               October 2010
ShepherdofShark         November 2010
Nutmeg1729               December 2010
futurefreak                 January 2010
Xanfor                        February 2010
Hobbitboy                   March 2010

2010 is the longest year ever.

I think this was Svip's point, Bend-err.

[Reply #210 on:]

Also congrats Xanfor!...

Don't forget futurefreak and ShepherdofShark as well.

We're all in ur subforum, moderating ur votes.

[Reply #211 on:]

I like you, Xanfor. You always spell my name right.

[Reply #212 on:]

Nutty: I count 12...

SoS: not my fault that 2011 is just as bad as 2010.

[Reply #213 on:]

Booze: I'm on there twice. That makes eleven people.

[Reply #214 on:]

You are not two people? I HAVE BEEN LIED TO!

[Reply #215 on:]

Hell no.

I'm actually three. You're talking to neutral Nutmeg just now. I bound and gagged Nice Nutmeg and Evil Nutmeg

[Reply #216 on:]

So you three killed naughty Nutmeg after all?

[Reply #217 on:]

Also congrats Xanfor!...

Don't forget futurefreak and ShepherdofShark as well.

We're all in ur subforum, moderating ur votes.

Congrats the lot of you, so do you take bribes now or what?...

[Reply #218 on:]

So you three killed naughty Nutmeg after all?

She was just a dream.

Also: I agree for making the votes hidden, but I think you should be allowed to change your vote. Is that even possible? Secret poll with the option to change which particular option you went with?

That way, I'd say that it's fair. And at the end of the 5th day, if there's a tie, a tie-breaker poll can then be opened.

I'd say it influences peoples decisions a lot more when they can see the person in the lead, but I know I've wanted to change my vote before, because I've picked at random and then remembered later something awesome that a different user did.

[Reply #219 on:]

I don't think that's actually possible, keeping the poll secret and allowing changes.

I'm actually three. You're talking to neutral Nutmeg just now. I bound and gagged Nice Nutmeg and Evil Nutmeg

It's always the quiet ones...

[Reply #220 on:]

So you three killed naughty Nutmeg after all?

She was just a dream.

Awww, she was fun



And afaik it is possible to make a blind poll where you can change your vote.

[Reply #221 on:]

edit: Confirmed, Bend-err is correct. Blind polls that let you change your vote are possible.

[Reply #222 on:]

Last poll I hope:

http://www.peelified.com/Futurama-Forum-18/Topic-20774-0-Q_Should_the_intermediate.html

If allowed, changing your vote is possible through removing your vote and voting again.

[Reply #223 on:]

Changing your vote seems like a pretty crappy way to run it. I mean, if it's a blind poll but several people have announced "I voted for [-mArc-]" and you voted for winna... you might decide to switch votes to [-mArc-] just so you're in with the majority. Because people are stupid and fickle like that. It's a partial subversion of the reasons for having a blind poll in the first place, IMO.

[Reply #224 on:]

I'd probably just make face accounts to vote for [-mArc-] in that scenario anyways.

[Reply #225 on:]

Could one decline being nominated for a month?

[Reply #226 on:]

I don't think we need a hard rule for every eventuality. Let's see about these things if they actually happen...

[Reply #227 on:]

Could one decline being nominated for a month?

No. If you're the best poster during a given month, that's entirely your fault and you can't shirk the responsibilities of your behavior.

[Reply #228 on:]

Really fantastic work [-mArc-], that poll organization made options so much easier. It seems that those who voted are in favor of a more traditionalist POTM style, which I like.

Also congrats Xanfor!...

Don't forget futurefreak and ShepherdofShark as well.

We're all in ur subforum, moderating ur votes.

Congrats the lot of you, so do you take bribes now or what?...

I never not accepted them...

[Reply #229 on:]

Could one decline being nominated for a month?

No.  You'll still be nominated, and then you'll get super banned and be unable to stop people from voting for you as well.

[Reply #230 on:]

So, how exactly will ties be handled now in nominations?

[Reply #231 on:]

I think we'll be taking the first 10 persons to get to the point of being elegible for the poll, and caressing them lovingly whilst we slap the shit out of the other candidates who weren't quite good enough. Then a mod makes the poll, and the lovingly caressed PEELers are thrown to the metaphorical lions of the public vote. Such a beautiful contrast. It's almost winna-esque.

[Reply #232 on:]

So, whoever gets the vote first will be in if it comes to a tie.

[Reply #233 on:]

We usually don't need to scrape to only one nomination, but essentially yes.

[Reply #234 on:]

And if we have a tie in the voting poll, do a runoff election for a couple of days.  Whoever makes the poll can edit it as well.

[Reply #235 on:]

Yes, I feel like we should try to figure out the tie procedure (both for nominations and voting) now rather than when it becomes an issue. So, to recap so I'm understanding correctly:

• Ties in nominations go to whomever received their last nomination first. (like old times)
• Ties in polls go to a run-off between the top two.

This correct? Was the idea of having a minimum amount of nominations to get into the poll scraped?

If you went back to 2006 and informed people that in five years I'd have the word "Moderator" written under my avatar, they'd probably tell you the same thing.

Can we go back to when I had that word under my avatar? Please? I've killed myself once, I'm willing to do it again!

[Reply #236 on:]

June begins tomorrow, when do we get to Nominate people for May?

[Reply #237 on:]

In June of course.

[Reply #238 on:]

I knew that, I mean when in June?

[Reply #239 on:]

Start of.