|
|
|
Mercapto
Professor
|
|
They did show McSeasons 2 & 3 on Zulu, but it's not like anybody watches that channel anyway, especially not at 2 am on Sundays. :/
I would be all for sacrificing Simpsons season 16 in return for another season of Futurama. In my opinion Simpsons is way past their prime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercapto
Professor
|
|
Originally posted by Pikka Bird: I would watch if I had the chance. But they only showed McSeason 1 on TV2 (standard), and that was around 2-4am... Abd I was watching!! That got me started. And I never stopped, although I had to find other means. The only problem was that I already had season 3 on DVD before they started showing it on Zulu. That just goes to show how fast TV2 & Co works. At least 3+ are pretty good at getting the new episodes of The Simpsons quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
|
« Reply #9 on: 01-09-2004 11:24 »
« Last Edit on: 01-09-2004 11:24 »
|
|
Originally posted by Mercapto: They did show McSeasons 2 & 3 on Zulu, but it's not like anybody watches that channel anyway, especially not at 2 am on Sundays. :/
I watched it every Sunday, bordering on fanatiscism. If killing the Simpsons will bring Futurama back, by God I'm willing to pay that price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A
Space Pope
|
|
Originally posted by PCC Fred: My reaction would be send Satan some mittens and a flask of soup to keep him warm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mattmag
Crustacean
|
|
because i am boycotting fox anyway i wouldnt care one bit. But why would they do this anyway? their job is not to piss off fans (although thats what they do)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ItsASuppository
Crustacean
|
|
Personally I would like it if it would happen. But even though it would be shown to less of an audience, there should be someway that it can be brought back on cartoon network (along with family guy I never miss a night with those two on). At least those people wouldn't be stupid enough to cancel it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sil
Professor
|
|
IMO the reason the Simpsons has gotten so weak is because several of its top-quality writers had defected to Futurama / left for pastures new.
Go for it - it needs to lay down quietly and give up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teral
Helpy McHelphelp
DOOP Secretary
|
|
Originally posted by leelaholic: It's retarded to have this thread when 90% of PEEL detests the Simpsons. Hyperbole is fun.
|
|
|
|
|
DotheBartman
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by Sil: IMO the reason the Simpsons has gotten so weak is because several of its top-quality writers had defected to Futurama / left for pastures new.
Go for it - it needs to lay down quietly and give up. Meh. Its all opinion about whether the show declined or not, but it was (IMO) already declining before Cohen and Keeler left for Futurama. And in all honesty, both were relatively weaker Simpsons writers. One of Cohen's scripts actually marked the ruining of Lisa, and the only Keeler script that wasn't below average for the time was "El Viaje de Nuestro Homer". Regarding writers leaving for other things, maybe, but keep in mind that that sort of thing happens with most shows. Most writers only stick around for two or three seasons. Almost none of the writers for seasons 1-3 were still around by 5-8, so its nothing new.
|
|
|
|
|
Coop
Professor
|
|
I think Simpson's should leave while it still has time. It is dying fast, and the only way to help it is to inject it with a lethal dose.
And I think that Futurama still had years ahead of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Mouse On Venus
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by DotheBartman: Meh. Its all opinion about whether the show declined or not, but it was (IMO) already declining before Cohen and Keeler left for Futurama. And in all honesty, both were relatively weaker Simpsons writers. One of Cohen's scripts actually marked the ruining of Lisa, and the only Keeler script that wasn't below average for the time was "El Viaje de Nuestro Homer".
Agreed. I think Cohen in particular is a lot more in his element writing in more fantastical contexts (since he wrote segments for five Treehouse Of Horror episodes) than the realistic (well, originally) motif of The Simpsons. Btw, which episode was it that ruined Lisa? "Lisa The Vegetarian?" On a related tangent, I wonder what Futurama would've been like if they had John Swartzwelder as one of the writers...
|
|
|
|
|
User_names_suck
Professor
|
|
|
« Reply #31 on: 01-11-2004 12:59 »
« Last Edit on: 01-11-2004 12:59 »
|
|
Yeah I would have liked to have seen a swartzwelder futurama script, his simpsons scripts are usually wilder, what could he do with futurama. although maybe's he's not a sci fi fan.
Actually Ken Keeler wrote a good script with the george bush episode. but some of the other 2 were very contreversial ones really. The critic crossover, (which i found funny and it didn't bother me since I dont think the critic was ever shown in england so i didn't know about it) and the one where skinner turns out to be an imposter. cohen wrote Lisa the vegetarian probably wasn't such a good idea, but it did feature simpons scenes I've ever seen where the eating dinner and homer and lisa aren't speaking.
I'd say simpsons should keep going, because you dont want to stop when its restoring itself, I think there planning to finish after the 20th series.
Someone early said the weak outweighs the strong Simpsons episodes, and I dont think I've ever disagreed with a statement more in life.
and I swear futurama just an unbelivable amount of cheesy lines, I saw problem with popplers and ugh some lines, were awful. and so was the plot, somehow I just found it really annoying the dilemma, oh no how will leela get out of this one. I'd rather watch a wacky simpsons adventure. and simpsons has only come close to making me cringe at such cheesy lines a couple of times. futurama had some every episode
|
|
|
|
|
User_names_suck
Professor
|
|
|
« Reply #32 on: 01-11-2004 13:03 »
« Last Edit on: 01-11-2004 13:03 »
|
|
Oh and cohen wrote Lisa the skeptic which ruined lisa's character more than the vegetarian episode,
|
|
|
|
|
|
DotheBartman
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by Mouse On Venus: Agreed. I think Cohen in particular is a lot more in his element writing in more fantastical contexts (since he wrote segments for five Treehouse Of Horror episodes) than the realistic (well, originally) motif of The Simpsons. Btw, which episode was it that ruined Lisa? "Lisa The Vegetarian?" "Vegetarian" may have set things in motion I guess, but she was still a good character there. "Lisa the Skeptic" is the one I was referring to. She became completely unbearable from that point on. And I say that as someone who considers Lisa to be my favorite character in the series otherwise. Keeler was also much better on Futurama then on The Simpsons. Godfellas in particular is just so much deeper and more expertly written then anything he did on The Simpsons, its quite a contrast really. In fact Keeler wrote the first truly awful episode IMO ("The Principal and the Pauper" ), and many of his others (Two Bad Neighbors, A Star is Burns, even his THOH stuff) were relatively weaker as well (Groening even pulled his name off of A Star is Burns). With the possible exception of "El Viaje de Nuestro Jomer", his Futurama work seems to be almost universally better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jemlyn
Poppler
|
|
I love the Simpsons, but I think we're still only up to season 12 in Autralia. But why should we have to choose between these two shows? If anything should be axed, it's another cheesy sitcom or cop show. Futurama in Australia was aired sporadically at best. I'm finding now that it's being released on dvd, more and more people are discovering it (and loving it). A show is never good once it's been brought back? That's network thinking!
|
|
|
|
|
Mouse On Venus
Liquid Emperor
|
|
Originally posted by DotheBartman:Keeler was also much better on Futurama then on The Simpsons. Godfellas in particular is just so much deeper and more expertly written then anything he did on The Simpsons, its quite a contrast really. In fact Keeler wrote the first truly awful episode IMO ("The Principal and the Pauper" ), and many of his others (Two Bad Neighbors, A Star is Burns, even his THOH stuff) were relatively weaker as well (Groening even pulled his name off of A Star is Burns). Yeah, but Groening didn't pull his name off A Star Is Burns because it was badly written as much as he did because it was a crossover concept that he disagreed with. The Principal And The Pauper I remember very well. In the CGEF interview, Keeler even mentioned that he thought that was the best episode he ever wrote and acknowledged it's widely considered status as the "jump the shark" moment of The Simpsons. Is that what they think on the NHC?
|
|
|
|
|