|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
harpenden

Crustacean

|
|
So: he writes what is undeniably a positive piece and accurately quotes Cohen -- oh, sorry; Cohen -- at great length but, because he makes two unimportant errors, is a jerk and doesn't care about his job? Hell, you're hard to please, Fistful! (Sorry; Fistful.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Professor

|
|
I think Fistful means that he would rather get info from a REAL fan.
No, he wants the news from a real JOURNALIST. Someone who actually bothers to check up on trivial things, like those he missed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Professor

|
|
I disagree. A journalist's job is to write an article to people and assume very little prior knowledge, yet, assume that there will also be people who have prior knowledge. There is often a context; such as writing for a computer magazine, etc.
A journalist have to do research on what he/she is writing. If not, the article will end up as an amateur piece, that any Joe could write. If this is the journalism we have come to expect. Then I can damn well understand why the Media industry is doing so badly lately. People simply expect too little of journalists these days.
You people ought to be a lot more outraged than you are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FistfulOAwesome

Bending Unit
  
|
|
Alright, let me come back in and say that I am disappointed the article writer didn't even bother to check his work (would it have been that hard to Wiki (or Infosphere  ) the show), but I probably am being a bit harsh about the rehashed material. Not everybody has time to watch the Q&A, so maybe a straight recap isn't a bad thing. Still, as Svip said, it seems like something any guy could have written, rather than by a supposed journalist who is being payed to write such material (I expect some effort by someone who is being payed for doing such a job). It's very impersonal and sloppy, like he didn't care that much (I can't imagine a real fan would make such lame, generic jokes). As for the jerk comment, that was done in jest about my own minor complaints being blown up in classic nerd-style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Professor

|
|
It also said that once the ships come out of that wormhole and only Fry and the Professor survive and everyone else will temporarly die and come back somehow hence the title 'Rebirth'. Don't believe that for one minute.
What part of it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Svip

Professor

|
|
The temporary death of the others.
Ah, but unfortunately for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FistfulOAwesome

Bending Unit
  
|
|
I was just stalking reading Moe's profile and apparently the episode is the "emmy shot" according to Moe it's....
"Hilarious, touching, meaningful, philosophical, even metaphysical. And did I mention, hilarious?"
Don't know if he's talking about episode 6 or 7 but I got high hopes for this one.
Ohh, that has to be the Time Travel episode! I can't think of any of the episodes leaked that fits that description more than the Time Travel episode. Hell it's even... been leaked that they go past the end of the universe. I can't think of many other times/spaces you'd find something more "touching, meaningful, philosophical, even metaphysical" than past the end of the universe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lavalamp247

Crustacean

|
|
wait in the title of this forum you said that the series is back its not its just a crappy review done up by some idiot ruining the series by telling all the secrets of the later episodes plus calling all the characters spineless gross and dumb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coldangel_1

Space Pope
   
|
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: 10-25-2009 15:18 »
« Last Edit on: 11-17-2009 18:08 by [-mArc-] »
|
|
Svip said: Well, I don't really have something that is news news regarding the coming season and such, but I do like mindless praising. Or well, praising, especially when it is not mindless, such as the Guardian article:
And the article itself says "Those morons let Futurama die in 2003, and although it is now back"BACK There IS a new season coming out. [edit: soap - mouth - rinse]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Shock

Professor

|
|
Some info about the fourth episode. Little information about this episode has been revealed so far, but it will deal with a robosexual relationship between Bender and Amy. Oh bugger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|